Kunbiao Zhang

Squeezed branch piles, originally developed for building and bridge foundations, have been downsized and deployed at larger pile spacing for reinforcing embankments over soft soils. However, the working mechanism of squeezed branch pile-supported embankments remains unclear. In this study, a three-dimensional numerical model of this embankment was established based on field tests. The analyses consider different pile types (squeezed branch piles and straight piles) and pile-head structures (beam-type cap and plate-type cap). These concrete components were modeled utilizing an advanced concrete model, which captures the strain-softening/hardening and yielding behavior. Simulation results show that squeezed branch piles provide better settlement control in the subsoil beneath the embankment than straight piles for the studied cases. The beam-type cap with squeezed branch piles behaves as a pile-beam foundation that reduces maximum settlement by around 38% compared to that of the plate-type cap, while the plate-type cap system functions as a composite foundation that enhances surcharge capacity by about 35–40%. The instability of the embankment is driven by tensile failure in concrete: The beam-type cap leads to a localized failure along the ground beam, and the plate-type cap system induces a progressive failure centered on the squeezed branch piles. Within the plate-type cap, the dimensions of the pile-head plate significantly influence settlement control and the stability of the embankment in soft soil.

In order to explore the problems of load transfer and anchorage mechanisms of tensile anchors under pull-out load for geotechnical anchoring systems, a step-wise mathematical model is established which considers the linear–nonlinear shear stress and shear displacement of the anchorage segment, using an elasto-plastic constitutive model. The displacement, axial force, and shear stress of the anchorage interface in different stages (elastic, plastic, and debonding) are analyzed and solutions are derived. And the theoretical solutions for the ultimate pull-out load of the anchor at each stage are also presented. Two in situ pull-out tests are used to verify and apply these findings in engineering. The results show that the stepwise composite model could reflect the bonding, softening and residual characteristics of the anchoring interface. In the process of the pull-out load increasing, the pulling end of the anchor initially enters the plastic stage and the debonding stage, respectively, and the failure of the anchor occurs at the pulling end, and as the axial force transfers down deeper, the damage gradually spreads deeper. The axial force distribution of the anchorage section is a monotonically decreasing curve, and the peak point of the shear stress gradually moves deeper. The calculation results of the axial force distribution curve and load–displacement curve of the anchor are in good agreement with the measured values, which verifies the rationality and reliability of the theoretical prediction method. This method can provide a theoretical reference for the load transfer analysis and design of tension anchors for geotechnical anchoring systems.