Sarah Ritzenthaler
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Sarah Ritzenthaler has a total of 1 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Akira Chiba
Department of Cell and Structural Biology, University of Illinois, B609 CLS Laboratory, 601 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 27 February 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Neurobiology
- Vol. 55 (1) , 31-40
Myopodia (postsynaptic filopodia) participate in synaptic target recognition
Synaptic partner cells recognize one another by utilizing a variety of molecular cues. Prior to neuromuscular synapse formation, Drosophila embryonic muscles extend dynamic actin‐based filopodia called “myopodia.” In wild‐type animals, myopodia are initially extended randomly from the muscle surface but become gradually restricted to the site of motoneuron innervation, a spatial redistribution we call “clustering.” Previous experiments with prospero mutant embryos demonstrated that myopodia clustering does not occur in the absence of motoneuron outgrowth into the muscle field. However, whether myopodia clustering is due to a general signal from passing axons or is a result of the specific interactions between synaptic partners remained to be investigated. Here, we have examined the relationship of myopodia to the specific events of synaptic target recognition, the stable adhesion of synaptic partners. We manipulated the embryonic expression of αPS2 integrin and Toll, molecules known to affect synaptic development, to specifically alter synaptic targeting on identified muscles. Then, we used a vital single‐cell labeling approach to visualize the behavior of myopodia in these animals. We demonstrate a strong positive correlation between myopodia activity and synaptic target recognition. The frequency of myopodia clustering is lowered in cases where synaptic targeting is disrupted. Myopodia clustering seems to result from the adherence of a subset of myopodia to the innervating growth cone while the rest are eliminated. The data suggest that postsynaptic cells play a dynamic role in the process of synaptic target recognition. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 55: 31–40, 2003
- 27 February 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Neurobiology
- Vol. 55 (1) , 31-40
Myopodia (postsynaptic filopodia) participate in synaptic target recognition
Synaptic partner cells recognize one another by utilizing a variety of molecular cues. Prior to neuromuscular synapse formation, Drosophila embryonic muscles extend dynamic actin‐based filopodia called “myopodia.” In wild‐type animals, myopodia are initially extended randomly from the muscle surface but become gradually restricted to the site of motoneuron innervation, a spatial redistribution we call “clustering.” Previous experiments with prospero mutant embryos demonstrated that myopodia clustering does not occur in the absence of motoneuron outgrowth into the muscle field. However, whether myopodia clustering is due to a general signal from passing axons or is a result of the specific interactions between synaptic partners remained to be investigated. Here, we have examined the relationship of myopodia to the specific events of synaptic target recognition, the stable adhesion of synaptic partners. We manipulated the embryonic expression of αPS2 integrin and Toll, molecules known to affect synaptic development, to specifically alter synaptic targeting on identified muscles. Then, we used a vital single‐cell labeling approach to visualize the behavior of myopodia in these animals. We demonstrate a strong positive correlation between myopodia activity and synaptic target recognition. The frequency of myopodia clustering is lowered in cases where synaptic targeting is disrupted. Myopodia clustering seems to result from the adherence of a subset of myopodia to the innervating growth cone while the rest are eliminated. The data suggest that postsynaptic cells play a dynamic role in the process of synaptic target recognition. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 55: 31–40, 2003