Sijia Liu

The Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region is a critical political and economic hub in China, which has long faced challenges related to atmospheric conditions. Traditional aerosol optical depth (AOD) monitoring methods suffer from issues of data discontinuity and gaps, limiting the ability for continuous long-term observation of aerosols. Aerosols have significant impacts on climate change and air quality, with AOD serving as a key indicator for characterizing atmospheric particulate concentration. Therefore, this study applied a machine learning model to improve all-day AOD estimation based on ground-level air quality and meteorological data, generating a long-term dataset spanning from 2018 to 2023. The results of the all-day AOD estimation method were evaluated through comparisons with Himawari-8, the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET), and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS). The estimated AOD demonstrated good agreement with AHI data, achieving an annual R² greater than 0.96 and RMSE less than 0.1. Spatially, the estimated AOD also showed strong consistency with AHI, AERONET, and CAMS. Additionally, the annual, seasonal, and hourly distribution characteristics of AOD from 2018 to 2023 were analyzed. Two typical cases of aerosol variation in the BTH region were selected and examined: a dust storm event in 2023 and changes during the Spring Festival in 2021. This method provides continuous data support for air pollution monitoring and control in the BTH region and offers valuable references for pollution prevention efforts.

Atmospheric aerosols affect climate change, air quality, and human health. The aerosol optical depth (AOD) is a widely utilized parameter for estimating the concentration of atmospheric aerosols. Consequently, continuous AOD monitoring is crucial for environmental studies. However, a method to continuously monitor the AOD throughout the day or night remains a challenge. This study introduces a method for estimating the All-Day AOD using ground air quality and meteorological data. This method allows for the hourly estimation of the AOD throughout the day in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region and addresses the lack of high temporal resolution monitoring of the AOD during the nighttime. The results of the proposed All-Day AOD estimation method were validated against AOD measurements from Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The R² between the estimated AOD and AHI was 0.855, with a root mean square error of 0.134. Two AERONET sites in BTH were selected for analysis. The results indicated that the absolute error between the estimated AOD and AERONET was within acceptable limits. The estimated AOD showed spatial and temporal trends comparable to those of AERONET and AHI. In addition, the hourly mean AOD was analyzed for each city in BTH. The hourly mean AOD in each city exhibits a smooth change at night. In conclusion, the proposed AOD estimation method offers valuable data for investigating the impact of aerosol radiative forcing and assessing its influence on climate change.

The relatively stable lunar illumination may be used to realize radiometric calibration under low light. However, there is still an insufficient understanding of the accuracy of models and the influence of parameters when conducting research on low-light radiometric calibration. Therefore, this study explores the applicability of three atmospheric radiative transfer models under different nighttime conditions. The simulation accuracies of three nighttime atmospheric radiative transfer models (Night-SCIATRAN, Night-MODTRAN, and Night-6SV) were evaluated using the visible-infrared imaging radiometer suite day/night band (VIIRS/DNB) data. The results indicate that Night-MODTRAN has the highest simulation accuracy under DNB. The consistency between simulated top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance and DNB radiance is approximately 3.1%, and uncertainty is 2.5%. This study used Night-MODTRAN for parameter sensitivity analysis. The results indicate that for the lunar phase angle, aerosol optical depth, surface reflectance, lunar zenith angle, satellite zenith angle, and relative azimuth angle, the average change rates are 68%, 100%, 2561%, 75%, 20%, and 0%. This paper can help better understand the performance of models under different atmospheric and geographical conditions, as well as whether existing models can simulate the complex processes of atmospheric radiation.