LBLisa Beck

Lisa Beck

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Lisa Beck has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Evert Verhagen

    Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    3 shared publications
  • Jörg Spörri

    Sports Medical Research Group, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

    3 shared publications
  • Caroline Bolling

    Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    2 shared publications
  • Gerald Mitterbauer

    FIS Athlete Health Unit, International Ski and Snowboard Federation, Oberhofen, Switzerland

    2 shared publications
  • Hubert Hörterer

    Medical Committee, International Ski and Snowboard Federation, Oberhofen, Switzerland

    2 shared publications
  • Maarit Valtonen

    Research Center for Olympic Sports, Jyväskylä, Finland

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) consensus statement on return-to-performance in competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders

    by Jörg Spörri, Philippe O Müller, Oriol Bonell Monsonís, Roald Bahr, Lisa Beck, Peter U Brucker, Lars Engbretsen, Christian Fink, Hubert Hörterer, Matthew J Jordan, et al.

    Returning to a high level of performance after injury is a significant challenge for athletes. However, current best practices for return-to-performance in competitive snow sports are not well understood due to a lack of research evidence and international harmonisation. The International Ski and Snowboard Federation commissioned this consensus statement to provide recommendations for the safe and successful return of competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders to competitive performance. An international consensus panel was formed to contribute their knowledge and perspectives on return-to-performance. The panel included experts with extensive experience in return-to-performance. The panel consisted of 23 experts (7 women and 16 men) from various skiing and snowboarding disciplines and levels of competition. It included 16 researchers, 6 snow sports or International Olympic Committee officials, 9 physicians, 6 physical therapists, 2 sports psychologists, 2 coaches and 2 former athletes, some of whom had two backgrounds/functions. However, it was disproportionately European (78%) and North American (13%), with minimal representation from South America (4%) and Africa (4%) and no representation from Asia or Australasia. The RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method was adopted for the underlying consensus process. First, the panel discussed which topics and questions should be included in the consensus statement before developing an overall structure. The consensus process then involved providing key content based on the literature or statements from experts/panel members. These were voted on three times by all the panel members, resulting in a list of 196 statements. The jointly developed overall structure and the final statement list then formed the basis for preparing the manuscript. This consensus statement aims to assist athletes, coaches and medical staff of international and national federations in planning and implementing safe and successful return-to-performance strategies for competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders.


  • Open Access

    International Ski and Snowboard Federation consensus statement on warm-up and cool-down in competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders

    by Jörg Spörri, Lisa Beck, Oriol Bonell Monsonís, Marine Alhammoud, Roald Bahr, Sheree Bekker, Dave Collins, Lars Engebretsen, Julie Harvey, Hubert Hörterer, et al.

    In diverse sports, warm-up (WUP) and cool-down (CD) activities are highly effective at improving performance-relevant factors and reducing the risk of injury when applied systematically; however, scientific evidence is widely lacking in snow sports. Similarly, there is a lack of international harmonisation with current best practices; this especially applies to prevention efforts targeting younger athletes. This International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) consensus statement aims to develop and promote recommendations regarding physical and psychological WUP&CD in competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders. The selected panel members represented a group of experts diverse in terms of gender, expertise/background, level of competition and skiing and snowboarding discipline. They included researchers, officials, physicians, physiotherapists, coaches or former athletes with extensive experience in the subject area. However, there was a gender imbalance in the composition of the panel (7 women and 13 men) and certain freestyle disciplines (eg, aerials and moguls) were under-represented. Most importantly, there was a strong over-representation of European members (85%) on the consensus panel. For the consensus process, the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. The panellists were asked to rate, discuss and rerate statements derived from the literature or expert/panellist opinions. The process was based on three online consensus sessions with different preparatory and follow-up tasks and three rounds of an online survey to vote on the statements. The final version of the FIS consensus statement was developed and approved after two iterative rounds of manuscript revision by the panel members. It is intended to guide athletes, coaches, medical staff of international and national federations and other entities who can promote and support appropriate WUP&CD practices for competitive alpine and freestyle skiers and snowboarders by providing support, resources or infrastructure.


  • Open Access

    Before hitting the slopes: athlete and staff perspectives on warm-up and activation in high-performance snowsports

    by Lisa Beck, Sheree Bekker, Evert Verhagen, Caroline Bolling, Jörg Spörri

    To explore warm-up and activation (W&A) practices in high-performance snowsports to describe their importance, application and potential improvements based on the perspectives of elite-level athletes and staff members. Qualitative study consisting of semistructured interviews with 13 international elite-level athletes, on-snow coaches, strength and conditioning coaches, sports physiotherapists and sports psychologists from different snowsports and subdisciplines: alpine skiing, freestyle skiing (park and pipe, aerials, moguls) and snowboarding (park and pipe, snowboard cross). The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed based on the principles of grounded theory. The main themes raised by the participants were (1) the importance of readiness for sports participation as the motive for W&A, (2) how readiness is reached with a structured W&A routine and (3) the different athlete-specific, task-specific and environmental-specific factors for optimal W&A. Athletes and staff members considered W&A an essential measure to get physically and mentally ready for sports participation. Being ready was described as a key factor for performance and injury prevention. For these athletes, adherence to W&A was the result of a process of experiencing the beneficial effects of W&A and learning from sustaining one or more injuries. Broad implementation of basic physical and mental W&A at the youth level was considered an important measure to increase the overall adoption of W&A as an inherent part of training and competition. At the elite level, W&A is performed to reach athletes’ mental and physical readiness for performance enhancement and injury prevention. W&A is acknowledged as a complex and dynamic programme and is typically adapted to sport-specific demands, injury risks, environmental circumstances and individual needs and preferences. Overall, this study provides valuable contextual insights into the complexity of W&A and the factors that need to be considered to make sport-specific recommendations.