SCSohini Chattopadhyay

Sohini Chattopadhyay

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Sohini Chattopadhyay has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Fungal Intracranial Infections (Central Nervous System‐Invasive Fungal Disease) in Patients With Haematological Disorders—A Single‐Centre Retrospective Study

    by Sohini Chattopadhyay, Lydia Jennifer Sumanth, Harshad Arvind Vanjare, Sharon Anbumalar Lionel, Sushil Selvarajan, Uday Kulkarni, Fouzia N. Abubacker, Kavitha M. Lakshmi, Anu Korula, Aby Abraham, et al.

    Background: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a sinister complication encountered in patients with haematological disorders. When occurring in the central nervous system (CNS), IFDs can have catastrophic outcomes.Objectives: To study the clinical presentation, predisposing etiological factors, and prognosis of a CNS‐IFD in a patient with a haematological disorder.Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study focusing on the clinical profile, diagnosis, treatment strategy and outcomes of 43 patients with an underlying haematological disorder, who were diagnosed with CNS‐IFD between 2018 and 2022.Results: Of the 43 patients, 18 were chemotherapy recipients, while 23 were stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients and 2 presented with CNS‐IFD at diagnosis. AML/MDS (37.2%) and ALL (18.6%) were the predominant underlying diagnoses. A sudden deterioration in sensorium (53.5%) was the earliest clinical sign, while T2 hyperintensities (26.8%), vascular involvement (26.8%) and ring‐enhancing lesions (16.3%) were the commonest radiological findings, with all patients exhibiting diffusion restriction in diffusion‐weighted images. Microbiological evidence of infection was obtained in all patients; however, culture positivity was established in only 25 patients. Rhizopus spp (23.2%) and Aspergillus spp (20.9%) were implicated in most cases. Overall survival of the cohort was 27.9% at a median follow‐up of 6 months. In patients who succumbed, the median time to death was 4 days (0–46).Conclusion: CNS‐IFD is associated with very poor survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy or an SCT, urging the need for prompt diagnosis and initiation of suitable antifungal therapy.

  • Relapse and transformation to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following immunosuppressive therapy for aplastic anemia is more common as compared to allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a negative impact on survival

    by Sohini Chattopadhyay, Sharon Lionel, Sushil Selvarajan, Anup J. Devasia, Anu Korula, Uday Kulkarni, Fouzia N. Aboobacker, Kavitha M. Lakshmi, Alok Srivastava, Vikram Mathews, et al.

    We studied the incidence of relapse, transformation to myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia, and survival in patients with aplastic anemia (AA) surviving more than 1 year after ATG/ALG-based immunosuppressive therapy (IST) between 1985 and 2020. Four-hundred seventy patients (413 adults and 57 children) were studied, and data were compared with 223 patients who underwent matched sibling donor transplant (MSD HSCT). Median follow-up is 50 months (12–359). Relapse occurred in 21.9% at a median time of 33.5 months (5–228) post IST. Twenty-six (5.5%) patients progressed to PNH, while 20 (4.3%) evolved to MDS/AML. Ten-year estimated overall survival (OS) is 80.9 ± 3% and was significantly better in patients without an event (85.1 ± 4%) compared to relapse (74.6% ± 6.2%) or clonal evolution (12.8% ± 11.8%) (p = 0.024). While the severity of AA (p = 0.011) and type of ATG (p = 0.028) used predicted relapse, only age at IST administration influenced clonal evolution (p = 0.018). Among HSCT recipients, relapse rates were 4.9% with no clonal evolution, and the 10-year OS was 94.5 ± 2%. In patients who survived 1 year following IST, outcomes were good except with clonal evolution to MDS/AML. These outcomes, however, were still inferior compared to matched sibling donor HSCT.