Alexa L. McDaniel
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alexa L. McDaniel has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Michelle Marie Moyer
Department of Viticulture and Enology, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center Washington State University Prosser Washington USA
2 shared publications - Basavaraj R. Amogi
Washington State Unievsrity,Biological System Engineering,Pullman,WA,USA
1 shared publication - David M. Gadoury
Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, Cornell AgriTech, Geneva, NY 14456
1 shared publication - Lav R. Khot
Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering Washington State University Prosser WA USA
1 shared publication - M. Jacob Schrader
Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering Washington State University Prosser WA USA
1 shared publication - Maria Mireles
Department of Viticulture and Enology, Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 North Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 June 2024
- Published by American Society for Enology and Viticulture in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Vol. 75 (1) , 0750014
Effects of Ultraviolet-C Light on Grapevine Powdery Mildew and Fruit Quality inVitis viniferaChardonnay
Background and goals Germicidal ultraviolet light (UV-C) has suppressed grapevine powdery mildew in multiple cropping systems. Our goals were to further characterize the curative effects of UV-C light against grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator) in laboratory experiments, to understand how UV-C can be integrated into vineyard disease management programs, and to determine the effects of season-long UV-C exposure on basic fruit chemistry. Methods and key findings UV-C doses of 100 and 200 J/m2 were applied to developing E. necator colonies at 24 to 144 hrs after inoculation in the lab. Both doses reduced colony development relative to the untreated control, and the effect of the 200 J/m2 dose was equivalent to that of the control (horticultural oil) treatment. UV-C was also applied in Vitis vinifera Chardonnay vineyards at 200 J/m2 once or twice weekly, under different application regimens (early-season only or season-long). In the most disease-favorable years, both regimens reduced foliar and cluster disease severity relative to the untreated control. Basic fruit chemistry was not affected by UV-C treatments in either the season-long UV-C trials or in an additional UV-C trial in Dresden, New York. Conclusions and significance The ability of UV-C to reduce powdery mildew on leaves and fruit in both low and high disease-pressure years, with no adverse effects on yield or fruit quality, suggests that it could be an additional, non-chemical tool to manage grapevine powdery mildew.
- 10 June 2024
- Published by American Society for Enology and Viticulture in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Vol. 75 (1) , 0750014
Open AccessEffects of Ultraviolet-C Light on Grapevine Powdery Mildew and Fruit Quality inVitis viniferaChardonnay
Background and goals Germicidal ultraviolet light (UV-C) has suppressed grapevine powdery mildew in multiple cropping systems. Our goals were to further characterize the curative effects of UV-C light against grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator) in laboratory experiments, to understand how UV-C can be integrated into vineyard disease management programs, and to determine the effects of season-long UV-C exposure on basic fruit chemistry. Methods and key findings UV-C doses of 100 and 200 J/m2 were applied to developing E. necator colonies at 24 to 144 hrs after inoculation in the lab. Both doses reduced colony development relative to the untreated control, and the effect of the 200 J/m2 dose was equivalent to that of the control (horticultural oil) treatment. UV-C was also applied in Vitis vinifera Chardonnay vineyards at 200 J/m2 once or twice weekly, under different application regimens (early-season only or season-long). In the most disease-favorable years, both regimens reduced foliar and cluster disease severity relative to the untreated control. Basic fruit chemistry was not affected by UV-C treatments in either the season-long UV-C trials or in an additional UV-C trial in Dresden, New York. Conclusions and significance The ability of UV-C to reduce powdery mildew on leaves and fruit in both low and high disease-pressure years, with no adverse effects on yield or fruit quality, suggests that it could be an additional, non-chemical tool to manage grapevine powdery mildew.
- Open Access
- 31 January 2024
- Published by American Society for Enology and Viticulture in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Vol. 75 (1) , 0750002
Ozonated Water Spray Does Not Suppress Grapevine Powdery Mildew or Grape Mealybug
Background and goals Ozone (O3) is a powerful oxidizer. When dissolved in water, O3 offers a direct, residue-free application to potentially control unwanted pests. Ozonated water spray (OWS) has been shown to suppress powdery mildew growth in greenhouse settings and cause insect mortality under in vitro conditions. Our goal was to evaluate the ability of OWS in lab and field settings to manage two main pests in eastern Washington vineyards: grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator) and grape mealybug (Pseudococcus maritimus). Methods and key findings The potential curative effects of ozonated water on nascent E. necator colonies and its lethal effects on P. maritimus nymphs were evaluated using O3 concentrations of 1 or 7 mg/L, delivered through a laboratory OWS system. These studies were coupled with field evaluations using a commercial OWS retrofit system to manage E. necator prebloom and P. maritimus as a delayed-dormant treatment. Our lab studies against E. necator confirmed that OWS was not effective at reducing colony formation. Due to low disease pressure years during the study, we cannot confirm the field efficacy of OWS applied prebloom. Laboratory-scale OWS was inconsistent at increasing P. maritimus nymph mortality. OWS field evaluations for P. maritimus management did not reduce the nymph population. Conclusions and significance Current OWS systems are not an effective tool for E. necator and P. maritimus management when applied at the O3 concentrations that current commercial units can generate.
- 31 January 2024
- Published by American Society for Enology and Viticulture in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Vol. 75 (1) , 0750002
Open AccessOzonated Water Spray Does Not Suppress Grapevine Powdery Mildew or Grape Mealybug
Background and goals Ozone (O3) is a powerful oxidizer. When dissolved in water, O3 offers a direct, residue-free application to potentially control unwanted pests. Ozonated water spray (OWS) has been shown to suppress powdery mildew growth in greenhouse settings and cause insect mortality under in vitro conditions. Our goal was to evaluate the ability of OWS in lab and field settings to manage two main pests in eastern Washington vineyards: grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator) and grape mealybug (Pseudococcus maritimus). Methods and key findings The potential curative effects of ozonated water on nascent E. necator colonies and its lethal effects on P. maritimus nymphs were evaluated using O3 concentrations of 1 or 7 mg/L, delivered through a laboratory OWS system. These studies were coupled with field evaluations using a commercial OWS retrofit system to manage E. necator prebloom and P. maritimus as a delayed-dormant treatment. Our lab studies against E. necator confirmed that OWS was not effective at reducing colony formation. Due to low disease pressure years during the study, we cannot confirm the field efficacy of OWS applied prebloom. Laboratory-scale OWS was inconsistent at increasing P. maritimus nymph mortality. OWS field evaluations for P. maritimus management did not reduce the nymph population. Conclusions and significance Current OWS systems are not an effective tool for E. necator and P. maritimus management when applied at the O3 concentrations that current commercial units can generate.