Frank B. Musa
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Frank B. Musa has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Allister Munthali
1 shared publication- Charles B. L. Jumbe
Centre for Agricultural Research and Development, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Bunda Campus), Lilongwe P.O Box 219, Malawi
1 shared publication - Judith Kamoto
Forestry Department, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi
1 shared publication - Laura A. Lewis
University of Southampton
1 shared publication - Leo Charles Zulu
Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
1 shared publication Mangani C. Katundu
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 January 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
- Vol. 22
Gender and livelihood assets: Assessing climate change resilience in Phalombe district – Malawi
- 25 January 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
- Vol. 22
Open AccessGender and livelihood assets: Assessing climate change resilience in Phalombe district – Malawi
- Open Access
- 10 November 2018
- Published by MDPI AG in Environments
- Vol. 5 (11) , 122
Adoption and the Role of Fertilizer Trees and Shrubs as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practice: The Case of Salima District in Malawi
Fertilizer trees and shrubs can improve degraded soil and avert the impacts of climate change on smallholder farmers in Malawi. This paper analyses the roles of fertilizer trees and shrubs and factors that determine adoption, as well as the intensity of use of fertilizer on trees and shrubs in maize-based farming systems using the Tobit model. A household survey involving 250 smallholder farmers was conducted in Salima district, Malawi. The analysis shows that adopters of fertilizer trees and shrubs considered fertility improvement, shade, source of food and erosion control as main roles of fertilizer trees and shrubs. The Tobit model shows that households with relatively more land are more likely to adopt fertilizer trees and shrubs than those with small land sizes. Adoption is higher among farmers who had been exposed to fertilizer trees and shrubs for longer periods than others had. Land tenure, education and availability of labor also influence the adoption of fertilizer trees and shrubs. Results further show that household and farm characteristics and availability of extension services explain the current adoption rates of tree-fertilizer technologies. Our findings can guide effective targeting of farmers to ensure higher adoption and sustainability of fertilizer-tree and shrub technology for climate-smart agriculture among the smallholder farmers.
- 10 November 2018
- Published by MDPI AG in Environments
- Vol. 5 (11) , 122
Open AccessAdoption and the Role of Fertilizer Trees and Shrubs as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practice: The Case of Salima District in Malawi
Fertilizer trees and shrubs can improve degraded soil and avert the impacts of climate change on smallholder farmers in Malawi. This paper analyses the roles of fertilizer trees and shrubs and factors that determine adoption, as well as the intensity of use of fertilizer on trees and shrubs in maize-based farming systems using the Tobit model. A household survey involving 250 smallholder farmers was conducted in Salima district, Malawi. The analysis shows that adopters of fertilizer trees and shrubs considered fertility improvement, shade, source of food and erosion control as main roles of fertilizer trees and shrubs. The Tobit model shows that households with relatively more land are more likely to adopt fertilizer trees and shrubs than those with small land sizes. Adoption is higher among farmers who had been exposed to fertilizer trees and shrubs for longer periods than others had. Land tenure, education and availability of labor also influence the adoption of fertilizer trees and shrubs. Results further show that household and farm characteristics and availability of extension services explain the current adoption rates of tree-fertilizer technologies. Our findings can guide effective targeting of farmers to ensure higher adoption and sustainability of fertilizer-tree and shrub technology for climate-smart agriculture among the smallholder farmers.