Jan Grzegorz Pochopień

Jan Grzegorz Pochopień

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Jan Grzegorz Pochopień has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Polyurethane Flexible Joints as an Advanced Adhesive Layer in Sustainable Prefabricated Small Bridge Structures

    by Dorota Jasińska, Paweł Szeptyński, Jan Grzegorz Pochopień, Arkadiusz Kwiecień

    This study presents an analysis of adhesively bonded reinforced concrete composite beams. Experimental results are compared with two computational approaches—an iterative algorithm based on an analytical solution and finite element analysis (FEA)—for simply supported composite beams subjected to four-point bending. The cross-section of the beam consists of two reinforced concrete beams bonded together with different adhesive layers: either flexible polyurethane or a stiff epoxy resin layer. This article begins by outlining the process used to determine the parameters for the flexible materials. The linear analytical model, based on the hypothesis of planar cross-sections for bent components and approximating the behavior of the adhesive layer by the pure shear state, leads to closed-form formulas for deflections and stresses in individual components of the system. These formulas are employed in an iterative procedure to evaluate the post-cracking behavior of composite beams. Conversely, the FEA model accounts for material non-linearity in both the adhesive and concrete, as well as the possibility of decohesion of the adhesive layer, providing a more detailed and accurate representation of the structure. The allowable loads, deflections, and stresses derived from both methods are evaluated and compared across various stages of structural performance: prior to cracking, and two serviceability limit states. The obtained results are validated through comparison with experimental data. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the analytical method for rapid assessment of the capacity of composite concrete structures in different work phases. The iterative procedure based on the analytical solution is found to provide reasonable approximations in terms of the deflection, stress distribution, and crack depth.


  • Open Access

    The Influence of the Flexibility of a Polymeric Adhesive Layer on the Mechanical Response of a Composite Reinforced Concrete Slab and a Reinforced Concrete Beam Girder

    by Paweł Szeptyński, Jan Grzegorz Pochopień, Dorota Jasińska, Arkadiusz Kwiecień

    This study addresses the challenges of modeling flexible connections in composite structures employing a polymeric adhesive layer. These types of connections provide a more uniform stress distribution compared to conventional rigid connectors. However, they lack standardized design rules and still require much research to sufficiently comprehend their properties. The novelty of this research lies in proposing an analytical solution to address these issues. Its aim is to investigate the influence of the stiffness of the polymer adhesive on the girder’s deflection and on the maximum stresses in both the adhesive and concrete. The analyzed composite structure consists of a reinforced concrete (RC) slab and an RC beam connected with a layer of flexible polyurethane (FPU) adhesive. Analytical and numerical approaches for the description of the mechanical response of a composite bridge girder are presented. Another objective is to validate the analytical design formulas using 3D nonlinear numerical analysis, both in the case of uncracked and cracked concrete. Seven types of FPUs are tested in the uniaxial tension test, each examined at five strain rates. The obtained data is used to predict the mechanical response of the considered girder using finite element analysis (FEA) as well as with a simplified one-dimensional composite beam theory. Fair agreement is found between the FEA results and theoretical predictions. A comparison of the results obtained for these two models is performed, and the similarities and discrepancies are highlighted and discussed.