Esther Garcia-Lorenzo

Background/Objectives: Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 blockers have revolutionized the treatment landscape of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking oncogene-addicted alterations, particularly in tumors with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%). Cemiplimab is approved as first-line monotherapy in this setting. However, real-world data remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent cemiplimab in a multicenter Spanish cohort and compare outcomes with a historical pembrolizumab cohort. Methods: Cemi-SPA is a retrospective multicenter study including 150 patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50% treated with cemiplimab as first-line monotherapy across 21 Spanish centers. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared with a historical cohort of 144 patients treated with pembrolizumab. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.1 and 12.6 months, respectively. ECOG performance status ≥ 2 was independently associated with worse outcomes, whereas the development of immune-related adverse events correlated with improved PFS and OS. After PSM, no significant differences were observed between cemiplimab and pembrolizumab in terms of efficacy. Conclusions: Cemiplimab demonstrated comparable real-world efficacy and safety to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. ECOG performance status emerged as the strongest prognostic factor, highlighting the importance of patient selection in routine clinical practice.

A raise in the incidence of NENs is expected. Therefore, the identification of new therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, remains crucial. To date, immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy have shown modest activity in unselected NENs. Although immunotherapy combos (plus another immune agents or chemotherapy, among others) are potentially more active than single agents, this has not been uniformly confirmed, even in high-grade NENs. Other immunotherapeutic strategies under development include bispecific antibodies, targeting specific tumor antigens like DLL3, and cell therapy. Currently, no predictive immune biomarkers are available to guide clinical decisions. A comprehensive tumor molecular profiling approach needs to be developed for the selection of patients with NEN who could potentially benefit from immunotherapy. Ideally, clinical trials should incorporate this tumor molecular profiling to identify predictive biomarkers and improve efficacy. Achieving this goal requires an international collaborative effort.

The identification of surfaceome proteins is a main goal in cancer research to design antibody-based therapeutic strategies. T cell engagers based on KLK2, a kallikrein specifically expressed in prostate cancer (PRAD), are currently in early clinical development. Using genomic information from different sources, we evaluated the immune microenvironment and genomic profile of prostate tumors with high expression of KLK2. KLK2 was specifically expressed in PRAD but it was not significant associated with Gleason score. Additionally, KLK2 expression did not associate with the presence of any immune cell population and T cell activating markers. A mild correlation between the high expression of KLK2 and the deletion of TMPRSS2 was identified. KLK2 expression associated with high levels of surface proteins linked with a detrimental response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) including CHRNA2, FAM174B, OR51E2, TSPAN1, PTPRN2, and the non-surface protein TRPM4. However, no association of these genes with an outcome in PRAD was observed. Finally, the expression of these genes in PRAD did not associate with an outcome in PRAD and any immune populations. We describe the immunologic microenvironment on PRAD tumors with a high expression of KLK2, including a gene signature linked with an inert immune microenvironment, that predicts the response to ICIs in other tumor types. Strategies targeting KLK2 with T cell engagers or antibody–drug conjugates will define whether T cell mobilization or antigen release and stimulation of immune cell death are sufficient effects to induce clinical activity.