Alex Walker
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alex Walker has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anastasia Fadeeva
Violence and Society Centre, City St George's, University of London, London, UK; School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, UK
2 shared publications - Emma R. Barton
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Investment in Health and Wellbeing, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
2 shared publications - Sally McManus
Violence and Society Centre, City St George’s, University of London, London, UK
2 shared publications - Bryony Parry
Public Health Wales, UK
1 shared publication - Catherine Donovan
Durham University, UK
1 shared publication - Estela Capelas Barbosa
Affiliation Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Public Health
- Vol. 245, 105775
Temporal trends in prevalence of violence in Wales: analysis of a national victimisation survey
- 29 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Public Health
- Vol. 245, 105775
Open AccessTemporal trends in prevalence of violence in Wales: analysis of a national victimisation survey
- Open Access
- 1 June 2024
- Published by Bristol University Press in Journal of Gender-Based Violence
- Vol. 8 (2) , 141-161
Bystander experiences of domestic violence and abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic
This article seeks to understand the experiences of bystanders to domestic violence and abuse (DVA) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Globally, professionals voiced concern over the COVID-19 restrictions exacerbating conditions for DVA to occur. Yet evidence suggests this also increased opportunities for bystanders to become aware of DVA and take action against it. This mixed methods study consists of a quantitative online survey and follow-up interviews with survey respondents. Conducted in Wales, UK, during a national lockdown in 2021, this article reports on the experiences of 186 bystanders to DVA during the pandemic. Results suggest that bystanders had increased opportunity to become aware of DVA due to the pandemic restrictions. Results support the bystander situational model whereby respondents have to become aware of the behaviour, recognise it as a problem, feel that they possess the correct skills, and have confidence in their skills, before they will take action. Having received bystander training was a significant predictor variable in bystanders taking action against DVA; this is an important finding that should be utilised to upskill general members of the community.
- 1 June 2024
- Published by Bristol University Press in Journal of Gender-Based Violence
- Vol. 8 (2) , 141-161
Open AccessBystander experiences of domestic violence and abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic
This article seeks to understand the experiences of bystanders to domestic violence and abuse (DVA) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Globally, professionals voiced concern over the COVID-19 restrictions exacerbating conditions for DVA to occur. Yet evidence suggests this also increased opportunities for bystanders to become aware of DVA and take action against it. This mixed methods study consists of a quantitative online survey and follow-up interviews with survey respondents. Conducted in Wales, UK, during a national lockdown in 2021, this article reports on the experiences of 186 bystanders to DVA during the pandemic. Results suggest that bystanders had increased opportunity to become aware of DVA due to the pandemic restrictions. Results support the bystander situational model whereby respondents have to become aware of the behaviour, recognise it as a problem, feel that they possess the correct skills, and have confidence in their skills, before they will take action. Having received bystander training was a significant predictor variable in bystanders taking action against DVA; this is an important finding that should be utilised to upskill general members of the community.
- Open Access
- 5 March 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 13 (3) , 147
Using Primary Care and Emergency Department Datasets for Researching Violence Victimisation in the UK: A Methodological Review of Four Sources
Violence is recognised as a cause of health harm, but it is not consistently or adequately captured in healthcare data systems. While administrative health records could be valuable sources of information for measuring violence, they remain underutilised in violence-related research. The present research aims to examine the suitability of violence indicators in emergency care, primary care, and linked healthcare datasets. Descriptive analyses were conducted with the 2015/16 Hospital Episode Statistics Accident and Emergency (HES A&E) and the 2021/22 Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS). The potential of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the South Wales Violence Surveillance dataset (a police and emergency department (ED) dataset linked by Public Health Wales) were shown using available evidence. Among the discussed datasets, the South Wales Violence Surveillance dataset has the most detail about violent acts and their contexts, while the CPRD includes a more extensive range of socioeconomic factors about patients and extensive linkage with other datasets. Currently, detailed safeguarding information is routinely removed from the ECDS extracts provided to researchers, limiting its utility for violence research. In the HES A&E, only physical violence was consistently recorded. Addressing these issues has the potential to improve the use of health administrative data in research on violence.
- 5 March 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 13 (3) , 147
Open AccessUsing Primary Care and Emergency Department Datasets for Researching Violence Victimisation in the UK: A Methodological Review of Four Sources
Violence is recognised as a cause of health harm, but it is not consistently or adequately captured in healthcare data systems. While administrative health records could be valuable sources of information for measuring violence, they remain underutilised in violence-related research. The present research aims to examine the suitability of violence indicators in emergency care, primary care, and linked healthcare datasets. Descriptive analyses were conducted with the 2015/16 Hospital Episode Statistics Accident and Emergency (HES A&E) and the 2021/22 Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS). The potential of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the South Wales Violence Surveillance dataset (a police and emergency department (ED) dataset linked by Public Health Wales) were shown using available evidence. Among the discussed datasets, the South Wales Violence Surveillance dataset has the most detail about violent acts and their contexts, while the CPRD includes a more extensive range of socioeconomic factors about patients and extensive linkage with other datasets. Currently, detailed safeguarding information is routinely removed from the ECDS extracts provided to researchers, limiting its utility for violence research. In the HES A&E, only physical violence was consistently recorded. Addressing these issues has the potential to improve the use of health administrative data in research on violence.