Sharvari Gunjotikar

Background: The aging of the population in developing and developed countries has led to a significant increase in the health burden of spinal diseases. These elderly patients often have a number of medical comorbidities due to aging. The need for minimally invasive techniques to address spinal disorders in this elderly population group cannot be stressed enough. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has several proven benefits, such as minimal muscle trauma, minimal bony resection, lesser postoperative pain, decreased infection rate, and shorter hospital stay. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using PubMed. Results: Over the past 40 years, constant efforts have been made to develop newer techniques of spine surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery is one such subset of MISS, which has all the benefits of modern MISS. Endoscopic spine surgery was initially limited only to the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. With improvements in optics, endoscopes, endoscopic drills and shavers, and irrigation pumps, there has been a paradigm shift. Endoscopic spine surgery can now be performed with high magnification, thus allowing its application not only to lumbar spinal stenosis but also to spinal fusion surgeries and cervical and thoracic pathology as well. There has been increasing evidence in support of these newer techniques of spine surgery. Conclusions: For this report, we studied the currently available literature and outlined the historical evolution of endoscopic spine surgery, the various endoscopic systems and techniques available, and the current applications of endoscopic techniques as an alternative to traditional spinal surgery.

Purpose: With an increase in the proportion of elderly patients, the global burden of spinal disease is on the rise. This is gradually expected to increase the number of surgical procedures all over the world in the near future. As we know, rehabilitation following spine surgery is critical for optimal recovery. However, the current literature lacks consensus regarding the appropriate post-operative rehabilitation protocol. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the optimal protocol for rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults. Materials and Methods: The goals of rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery are to improve physical and psychosocial function and may include multiple modalities such as physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, specialized instruments, and instructions to be followed during activities of daily living. In recent years, not only are a greater number of spine surgeries being performed, but various different techniques of lumbar spine surgery and spinal fusion have also emerged. (1) Our review summarizes post-operative rehabilitation under the following headings—1. Historical aspects, 2. Subjective functional outcomes, and (3) Actual rehabilitation measures, including balance. Results: Physical therapy programs need to be patient-specific and surgery-specific, such that they consider patient-reported outcome measures and take into consideration the technique of spinal fusion used and the muscle groups involved in these surgeries. By doing so, it is possible to assess the level of functional impairment and then specifically target the strengthening of those muscle groups affected by surgery whilst also improving impaired balance and allowing a return to daily activities. Conclusions: Rehabilitation is a multi-faceted journey to restore mobility, function, and quality of life. The current rehabilitation practice focuses on muscle strengthening, but the importance of spinal balance is less elaborated. We thus equally emphasize muscle strengthening and balance improvement post-lumbar spine surgery.

The aging of the population in developing and developed countries has lead to a significant increase in health burden of spinal diseases. These elderly patients often have a number of medical co-morbidities due to aging. The need for minimally invasive techniques to address spinal disorders in this elderly population group cannot be stressed enough. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has several proven benefits such as minimal muscle trauma, minimal bony resection, lesser post-operative pain, decreased infection rate and shorter hospital stay. Over the last 40 years, constant efforts are being made to develop newer techniques of spine surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery is one such subset of MISS which has all the benefits of modern MISS. Endoscopic spine surgery initially was limited only to treatment of lumbar disc herniations. With improvement in optics, endoscopes, endoscopic drills and shavers, irrigation pumps, there has been a paradigm shift. Endoscopic spine surgery can now be performed with high magnification thus allowing its application not only to lumbar spinal stenosis, but also to spinal fusion surgeries, cervical and thoracic pathology as well. There has been increasing evidence in support of these newer techniques of spine surgery. For the purpose of this review, we studied current available literature and outlined the historical evolution of endoscopic spine surgery, the various different endoscopic systems, and techniques available and the current applications of endoscopic techniques as an alternative to traditional spinal surgery.

With an increase in proportion of elderly patients, the global burden of spinal disease is on the rise. Likewise, there has been an increasing trend in the number of spine surgeries being performed worldwide. As we know, rehabilitation following spine surgery is critical for optimal recovery. However, current literature lacks consensus regarding the appropriate post operative rehabilitation protocol. The goals of rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery are to improve physical and psychosocial function and may include multiple modalities such as physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, specialized instruments, and instruction to be followed during activities of daily living. In recent years, not only are a greater number of spine surgeries being performed, various different techniques of lumbar spine surgery and spinal fusion have emerged. Physical therapy programs need to be curated after assessing the functional status of the patient by using various patient reported outcome measures and taking into consideration the technique of spinal fusion used and the muscle groups involved in these surgeries. By doing so it is possible to assess the level of functional impairment and then specifically target strengthening of those muscle groups affected by surgery whilst also improving impaired balance and allowing return to activities of daily living. We reviewed available literature pertaining to the history of spinal rehabilitation, the popular patient reported outcome measures used and different rehabilitation methods with the purpose of summarizing the current guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation after spine surgery and to introduce the rehabilitation after lumbar surgeries that we provide at our hospital.

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of early balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) intervention compared with late intervention for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). Background: Osteoporotic vertebral fracture can lead to kyphotic deformity, severe back pain, depression, and disturbances in activities of daily living (ADL). Balloon kyphoplasty has been widely utilized to treat symptomatic OVFs and has proven to be a very effective surgical option for this condition. Furthermore, BKP is relatively a safe and effective method due to its reduced acrylic cement leakage and greater kyphosis correction. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our hospital for patients who underwent BKP for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the time frame between January 2020 and December 2022. Ninety-nine patients were included in this study, and they were classified into two groups: in total, 36 patients underwent early BKP intervention (EI) at Results: Adjacent segmental fractures were more frequently observed in the LI group compared to the EI group (33.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.034). There was a significant improvement in postoperative vertebral angles in both groups (p = 0.036). The cement volume injected was 7.42 mL in the EI, compared with 6.3 mL in the LI (p = 0.007). The mean surgery time was shorter in the EI, at 30.2 min, compared with 37.1 min for the LI, presenting a significant difference (p = 0.0004). There was no statistical difference in the pain visual analog scale (VAS) between the two groups (p = 0.711), and there was no statistical difference in cement leakage (p = 0.192). Conclusions/Level of Evidence: Early BKP for OVF treatment may achieve better outcomes and fewer adjacent segmental fractures than delayed intervention.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of early ballon kyphoplasty (BKP) intervention compared with late intervention for osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Background: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures, can lead to kyphotic deformity, severe back pain, depression, and disturbances in activities of daily living (ADL). BKP has been widely utilized to treat symptomatic OVFs and has proven to be a very effective surgical option for this condition. BKP is relatively a safe and effective method due to less acrylic cement leakage and greater kyphosis correction. Materials and Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at our hospital for patients who underwent BKP for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the time frame between January 2020 and December 2022. Ninety-nine patients were included in this study, patients were classified into two groups: 36 patients underwent early BKP intervention (EI)