Adelina-Elena Cristea
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Adelina-Elena Cristea has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alina Deniza Ciubean
Department of Physical Medicine, Balneotherapy and Rehabilitation, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Andreea-Bianca Uzun
Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus-Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
1 shared publication - Bogdan Marian Caraban
Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus—Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
1 shared publication - Dan Iliescu
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus—Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
1 shared publication - Irina Motoașcă
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 8 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Laszlo Irsay
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, 400066 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 February 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (5) , 1190
Assessment of Integrative Therapeutic Methods for Improving the Quality of Life and Functioning in Cancer Patients—A Systematic Review
Background: Cancer rehabilitation represents a series of measures adopted for the recovery of psychological, emotional, social, and financial functioning in the case of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the main elements of therapeutic management in the field of medical rehabilitation, as well as integrative, complementary medicine and holistic approaches that can be performed on the oncological patient. Methods: This systematic literature review follows the methodology outlined in the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis” (“PRISMA”) statement, which is an internationally recognized and widely accepted standard. Results: Active rehabilitative therapies offer therapeutic options for improving the functioning and quality of life of oncological patients; these therapies comprehensively address both the physical and psychological aspects of the disease. This review also includes the latest novelties and nanotechnologies applied in oncological rehabilitation, for example, drugs (or supplements) inspired by nature. Conclusions: Physical and rehabilitation medicine, mostly using stimulating therapeutic methods, was recently added to the list of contraindications in the management of oncological patients, both as an approach to the pathological concept itself and as an approach to the main clinical consequences and functional aspects of oncological therapies. Integrative, complementary medicine presents an important therapeutic resource in the case of oncological patients. Advanced studies are needed in the future to further ascertain the role of these therapies.
- 20 February 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (5) , 1190
Open AccessAssessment of Integrative Therapeutic Methods for Improving the Quality of Life and Functioning in Cancer Patients—A Systematic Review
Background: Cancer rehabilitation represents a series of measures adopted for the recovery of psychological, emotional, social, and financial functioning in the case of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the main elements of therapeutic management in the field of medical rehabilitation, as well as integrative, complementary medicine and holistic approaches that can be performed on the oncological patient. Methods: This systematic literature review follows the methodology outlined in the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis” (“PRISMA”) statement, which is an internationally recognized and widely accepted standard. Results: Active rehabilitative therapies offer therapeutic options for improving the functioning and quality of life of oncological patients; these therapies comprehensively address both the physical and psychological aspects of the disease. This review also includes the latest novelties and nanotechnologies applied in oncological rehabilitation, for example, drugs (or supplements) inspired by nature. Conclusions: Physical and rehabilitation medicine, mostly using stimulating therapeutic methods, was recently added to the list of contraindications in the management of oncological patients, both as an approach to the pathological concept itself and as an approach to the main clinical consequences and functional aspects of oncological therapies. Integrative, complementary medicine presents an important therapeutic resource in the case of oncological patients. Advanced studies are needed in the future to further ascertain the role of these therapies.