David Gorelick
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
David Gorelick has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ariel Dadush
Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
1 shared publicationAriel Feiglin
Skip Therapeutics Ltd, Ness Ziona, Israel
1 shared publication- Erez Y. Levanon
Bar-Ilan University
1 shared publication - Eyal Rozenfeld
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health, Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
1 shared publication Eytan Ruppin
Cancer Data Science Lab, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
1 shared publication- Galit Shohat-Ophir
The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 6 September 2024
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 10 (36) , eadi9101
A highly conserved A-to-I RNA editing event within the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluClα is necessary for olfactory-based behaviors in Drosophila
A-to-I RNA editing is a cellular mechanism that generates transcriptomic and proteomic diversity, which is essential for neuronal and immune functions. It involves the conversion of specific adenosines in RNA molecules to inosines, which are recognized as guanosines by cellular machinery. Despite the vast number of editing sites observed across the animal kingdom, pinpointing critical sites and understanding their in vivo functions remains challenging. Here, we study the function of an evolutionary conserved editing site in Drosophila , located in glutamate-gated chloride channel ( GluCl α). Our findings reveal that flies lacking editing at this site exhibit reduced olfactory responses to odors and impaired pheromone-dependent social interactions. Moreover, we demonstrate that editing of this site is crucial for the proper processing of olfactory information in projection neurons. Our results highlight the value of using evolutionary conservation as a criterion for identifying editing events with potential functional significance and paves the way for elucidating the intricate link between RNA modification, neuronal physiology, and behavior.
- 6 September 2024
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 10 (36) , eadi9101
A highly conserved A-to-I RNA editing event within the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluClα is necessary for olfactory-based behaviors in Drosophila
A-to-I RNA editing is a cellular mechanism that generates transcriptomic and proteomic diversity, which is essential for neuronal and immune functions. It involves the conversion of specific adenosines in RNA molecules to inosines, which are recognized as guanosines by cellular machinery. Despite the vast number of editing sites observed across the animal kingdom, pinpointing critical sites and understanding their in vivo functions remains challenging. Here, we study the function of an evolutionary conserved editing site in Drosophila , located in glutamate-gated chloride channel ( GluCl α). Our findings reveal that flies lacking editing at this site exhibit reduced olfactory responses to odors and impaired pheromone-dependent social interactions. Moreover, we demonstrate that editing of this site is crucial for the proper processing of olfactory information in projection neurons. Our results highlight the value of using evolutionary conservation as a criterion for identifying editing events with potential functional significance and paves the way for elucidating the intricate link between RNA modification, neuronal physiology, and behavior.
- Open Access
- 26 February 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Genomic Medicine
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-11
DNA and RNA base editors can correct the majority of pathogenic single nucleotide variants
The majority of human genetic diseases are caused by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the genome sequence. Excitingly, new genomic techniques known as base editing have opened efficient pathways to correct erroneous nucleotides. Due to reliance on deaminases, which have the capability to convert A to I(G) and C to U, the direct applicability of base editing might seem constrained in terms of the range of mutations that can be reverted. In this evaluation, we assess the potential of DNA and RNA base editing methods for treating human genetic diseases. Our findings indicate that 62% of pathogenic SNVs found within genes can be amended by base editing; 30% are G>A and T>C SNVs that can be corrected by DNA base editing, and most of them by RNA base editing as well, and 29% are C>T and A>G SNVs that can be corrected by DNA base editing directed to the complementary strand. For each, we also present several factors that affect applicability such as bystander and off-target occurrences. For cases where editing the mismatched nucleotide is not feasible, we introduce an approach that calculates the optimal substitution of the deleterious amino acid with a new amino acid, further expanding the scope of applicability. As personalized therapy is rapidly advancing, our demonstration that most SNVs can be treated by base editing is of high importance. The data provided will serve as a comprehensive resource for those seeking to design therapeutic base editors and study their potential in curing genetic diseases.
- 26 February 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Genomic Medicine
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-11
Open AccessDNA and RNA base editors can correct the majority of pathogenic single nucleotide variants
The majority of human genetic diseases are caused by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the genome sequence. Excitingly, new genomic techniques known as base editing have opened efficient pathways to correct erroneous nucleotides. Due to reliance on deaminases, which have the capability to convert A to I(G) and C to U, the direct applicability of base editing might seem constrained in terms of the range of mutations that can be reverted. In this evaluation, we assess the potential of DNA and RNA base editing methods for treating human genetic diseases. Our findings indicate that 62% of pathogenic SNVs found within genes can be amended by base editing; 30% are G>A and T>C SNVs that can be corrected by DNA base editing, and most of them by RNA base editing as well, and 29% are C>T and A>G SNVs that can be corrected by DNA base editing directed to the complementary strand. For each, we also present several factors that affect applicability such as bystander and off-target occurrences. For cases where editing the mismatched nucleotide is not feasible, we introduce an approach that calculates the optimal substitution of the deleterious amino acid with a new amino acid, further expanding the scope of applicability. As personalized therapy is rapidly advancing, our demonstration that most SNVs can be treated by base editing is of high importance. The data provided will serve as a comprehensive resource for those seeking to design therapeutic base editors and study their potential in curing genetic diseases.