Louise Acret

Louise Acret

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Louise Acret has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Correction: Health-related quality of life in patients receiving medicinal cannabis: systematic review and meta-analysis of primary research findings 2015–2025

    by Margaret-Ann Tait, Louise Acret, Daniel S. J. Costa, Rachel Campbell, Kate White, Claudia Rutherford

  • Open Access

    Health-related quality of life in patients receiving medicinal cannabis: systematic review and meta-analysis of primary research findings 2015–2025

    by Margaret-Ann Tait, Louise Acret, Daniel S. J. Costa, Rachel Campbell, Kate White, Claudia Rutherford

    Purpose: The global burden of chronic health conditions is significant. Medicinal cannabis (MC) is a legalised treatment option for patients with chronic health conditions in some countries. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an important patient-reported outcome across all chronic health conditions. We aimed to determine how studies of MC therapy justify, measure, and report HRQL, and assess the current evidence for HRQL following MC treatment. Methods: Systematic review searching AMED, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycINFO from Jan 2015 to Apr 2025. Studies using validated HRQL measures pre-, and post-MC treatment for any chronic health condition were included. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Completeness of HRQL reporting was evaluated. Meta-analyses for short-term (2-weeks to 3-months), medium-term (> 3 to < 12-months), and long-term (≥ 12-months) HRQL outcomes were conducted, with Risk of Bias (RoB) assessed in randomised control trials (RCTs). Results: Of 16,674 retrieved citations, 64 studies were retained for analysis:12 RCTs; 38 cohort studies; 13 case series; 1 non-randomised experimental study. Thirty-nine studies (61%) provided justification for assessing HRQL and five (8%) provided HRQL definitions. Studies used generic ( n = 52, 81%) or condition-specific ( n = 12, 19%) HRQL measures, with EQ-5D-5L most commonly used. Meta-analyses: RCTs showed small short-term HRQL improvements (Cohen’s d = 0.30, p = 0.03), with some concerns or low RoB. For observational studies, HRQL improved in all follow-up periods (d = 0.43 to 0.74; all p < 0.001). HRQL improvement varied between, and within, different health conditions. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analyses of studies published between 2015 and 2025 found that few studies provided HRQL definitions, and a third of studies did not explain why they measured HRQL. To ensure appropriate measures are used for this important treatment outcome, future studies should define HRQL and justify the HRQL assessment in the context of research objectives. Overall, improvements in HRQL were observed across studies of patients using MC.


  • Open Access

    Perspectives and Experiences of Healthcare Professionals Involved in a Community Nurse-Delivered Shared Care Model Intervention Designed to Support Outpatients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Qualitative Study Using Interviews

    by Bora Kim, Chantale Boustany, Louise Acret, Jodi McLeod, Natalie Cook, Heather McKenzie, Lillian Hayes, Judith Fethney, Judy M. Simpson, Simon Willcock, et al.

    Background. Chemotherapy can cause a range of side effects including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and infection, which can have a significant impact on an individuals quality of life. Survival outcomes can be impacted when side effects are poorly managed, leading to failure to complete the defined dose of treatment. Objective. This study presents clinicians experiences with a shared care model involving home-based community nurse (CN) support to improve side-effect management of individuals receiving chemotherapy as an outpatient. Methods. A qualitative study was conducted with CNs, cancer nurses, medical oncologists, and a general practitioner involved in the CN intervention delivered as part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at reducing unplanned presentations to hospital of cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. Semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted. Key themes were identified using thematic analysis. Findings. Twenty-three healthcare professionals were interviewed. Three themes were identified: (1) being able to enhance patient-centered care and clinical practice during chemotherapy; (2) importance of effective communication and collaborative relationships between different care settings; and (3) ways to adapt the intervention for implementation in routine clinical practice. Participants reported that it was feasible for CNs to care for this patient group, and their home visits enabled preemptive symptom management. Suggestions to improve and modify the intervention to implement this care model within existing clinical care included a flexible approach, such as a blended delivery with face-to-face visits and telephone calls; a risk- or needs-based approach to prioritize patient groups more likely to benefit from the intervention; and sharing of electronic medical records for more effective collaboration and communication. Conclusions. A CN-delivered shared care model provided a feasible approach to the provision of individualized support for outpatients receiving chemotherapy. This study suggests ways to adapt this care model into existing clinical workflow and structures. This trial is registered with ACTRN12614001113640.


  • Evaluation of a nurse practitioner-led extended hours mental health liaison nurse service based in the emergency department

    by Timothy Wand, Natalie D’aBrew, Catherine Barnett, Louise Acret, Kathryn White

    Objective: To evaluate a nurse practitioner (NP)-led extended hours mental health liaison nurse (MHLN) service based in the emergency department (ED) of an inner city teaching hospital in Sydney and to explicate a model of care that is transferable across a broad range of ED settings, both in metropolitan and rural contexts. Methods: This mixed-methods evaluation encompassed descriptive data on ED mental health presentations, quantifying waiting times for MHLN involvement and interviews with MHLN team members at the commencement of the evaluation and 12 months later. Interviews were also conducted with a snapshot of ED patients, and a sample of ED and psychiatry staff. Results: The expanded MHLN service was rapidly incorporated into the ED structure, enthusiastically endorsed by ED patients and highly valued by staff and the organisation. The MHLN team saw 55% of referred patients within the first hour of arrival (frequently before medical assessment), thereby initiating and expediting co-ordination of care at an early stage of the ED process. Conclusions: An NP-led extended hours MHLN team based in the ED provides prompt and effective access to specialised mental health care for people with ‘undifferentiated health problems’, and removes a significant workload from nursing and medical staff. Embedding the NP-led MHLN service within the ED structure was pivotal to the success and sustainability of this model of care. What is known about the topic?: Mental health liaison nurse (MHLN) services have existed in emergency departments (EDs) in Australia and internationally for many years. However, there is great variation in the way these services are structured and no standardised model of care has been explicated. What does this paper add?: Findings from this evaluation indicate that a nurse practitioner-led extended hours MHLN service integrated within the ED team structure provides prompt access to specialised mental health care to people with undifferentiated health problems, and removes a significant workload from ED nursing and medical staff. What are the implications for practitioners?: Mental health nurse-led service provision based in the ED is a safe, flexible and effective method of enhancing access to health care that is adaptable to broad range of settings. ED ownership of this model of care is pivotal to the successful implementation and sustainability of MHLN services.