Sophia Echevarria

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the degree to which pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) increases the risk of different types of biliary cancer (BC). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct. We systematically searched from inception to April 2024. The search terms included were derived from the keywords “Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction” OR “Anomalous Pancreaticobiliary Junction” AND “Cancer” OR “Malignancy”. Studies that provided data comparing BC rates in relation to PBM presence or vice versa were included. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment. The random-effects model was used. Results: Fifteen studies were included with a total sample of 8604 patients, of whom 5015 (58.29%) were female with a mean age of 54.58 years. Patients with PBM had 8.42 (95% CI = 3.57–19.87) more risk of developing any type of BC, with a higher risk of GBC than BDC (OR = 16.91 vs. OR = 3.36, p-value = 0.003). There was a higher risk of having PBM in patients with GBC than BDC only when considering the Asian population (OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 1.09–8.94). Meta-regression analysis revealed that neither mean age (p = 0.087) nor percentage of female patients in the study population (p = 0.197) were statistically associated with the variations in OR for the risk of BC based on the presence of PBM. Conclusions: There is a significant association between PBM and the risk of having BC, mainly GBC when compared to BDC. Most of the studies published reported data from Japanese patients, which limits the generalization of the results. The age of patients and sex were not significantly associated with the relation between PBM and BC. Further prospective studies in broader populations will provide additional details to take measures for screening and early management of PBM and BC.

Background: Robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery (RMBS) has emerged as an innovative approach in the treatment of severe obesity by combining the ergonomic precision of robotic technology and instrumentation with the established benefits of weight loss surgery. This study employs a bibliometric approach to identify local research trends and worldwide patterns in RMBS. Materials & Methods: The research methodology used “robotic” and “metabolic” or “bariatric surgery” to search Web of Science. Articles that were published prior to December 31st, 2023, were included. The analyses were developed using the Rayyan and Bibliometric, in R Studio. Results: 265 articles from 51 different journals were included. Scientific production of RMBS experienced a significant annual growth rate of 21.96% from 2003 to 2023, resulting in an average of 12.6 papers published per year. A high correlation (R2 = 0.94) was found between the year and number of articles. The mean number of citations per document was 13.25. Approximately 90% of the journals were classified as zone 3, according to the Bradford categorization. International collaboration was identified in 10.57% of cases, with the University of California and the University of Illinois being the most common organizations. The countries with the highest number of corresponding authors, in descending order, were the United States of America, China, and Switzerland. Conclusion: Scientific production in RMBS has experienced sustained growth since the first original publications in 2003. While it has not yet reached the volume, impact, and international collaboration seen in studies related to non-robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery, RBMS holds potential that remains to be explored. Graphical abstract

The rise of robotic surgery throughout the world, particularly in Latin America, justifies an objective evaluation of research in this field. This study aimed to use bibliometric techniques to identify the research trends and patterns of robotic surgery in Latin America. The research strategy used the terms “Robotic,” “Surgery,” and the name of all the Latin American countries, in all fields and collections of Web of Science database. Only original articles published between 2009 and 2022 were included. The software Rayyan, Bibliometric in the R Studio, and VOSViewer were used to develop the analyses. After screening, 96 articles were included from 60 different journals. There was a 22.51% annual increase in the scientific production of robotic surgery in the period studied. The more frequent topics by specialty were: Urology (35.4%), General Surgery (34.4%), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (12%). International cooperation was observed in 65.62% of the studies. The Latin American institution with the highest production of manuscripts was the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Mexico, Chile, and Brazil were, in descending order, the nations with the highest number of corresponding authors and total citations. When considering the total number of articles, Brazil ranked ahead of Chile. Scientific production regarding robotic surgery in Latin America has experienced accelerated growth since its beginning, supported by the high degree of collaboration with leading countries in the field.