Xiaosong Zhao
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Xiaosong Zhao has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chen Wang
School of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China
1 shared publication - Chunjiang Zhao
School of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China
1 shared publication - Dongping Zhao
School of Aerospace Engineering, Xihang University, Xi’an 710077, China
1 shared publication - Gangfeng Wang
Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment of MOE, School of Construction Machinery, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
1 shared publication - Ning Zhao
School of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
1 shared publication - Shaolu Li
School of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
An Assembly Accuracy Analysis Method for Weak Rigid Components
Most existing assembly accuracy analysis methods focus on rigid assemblies or assume assemblies to be rigid bodies, neglecting the influence of assembly deformation in weak rigid components (WRCs) such as thin-walled structures, cantilever structures, etc. As a result, the assembly accuracy analysis becomes inaccurate, and the accuracy of key components cannot be effectively controlled. This may lead to serious issues such as forced assembly, repair, and rework. To address these problems, this study proposes a rigid–flexible coupling-based assembly accuracy analysis method for WRCs. The stiffness matrix and assembly deformation of WRCs are calculated, and by coupling assembly deformation with other assembly deviations, a rigid–flexible coupling assembly accuracy data model is established. This model incorporates multiple deviation sources, including assembly process variations, design tolerances, and assembly deformations. Assembly deviation transfer modeling and accumulation calculation methods for WRCs are investigated, enabling assembly accuracy simulation and statistical analysis. A case study on WRC assembly accuracy analysis is conducted, and the results demonstrate that the proposed method improves the accuracy of assembly analysis for WRCs, verifying its reliability.
Open AccessAn Assembly Accuracy Analysis Method for Weak Rigid Components
Most existing assembly accuracy analysis methods focus on rigid assemblies or assume assemblies to be rigid bodies, neglecting the influence of assembly deformation in weak rigid components (WRCs) such as thin-walled structures, cantilever structures, etc. As a result, the assembly accuracy analysis becomes inaccurate, and the accuracy of key components cannot be effectively controlled. This may lead to serious issues such as forced assembly, repair, and rework. To address these problems, this study proposes a rigid–flexible coupling-based assembly accuracy analysis method for WRCs. The stiffness matrix and assembly deformation of WRCs are calculated, and by coupling assembly deformation with other assembly deviations, a rigid–flexible coupling assembly accuracy data model is established. This model incorporates multiple deviation sources, including assembly process variations, design tolerances, and assembly deformations. Assembly deviation transfer modeling and accumulation calculation methods for WRCs are investigated, enabling assembly accuracy simulation and statistical analysis. A case study on WRC assembly accuracy analysis is conducted, and the results demonstrate that the proposed method improves the accuracy of assembly analysis for WRCs, verifying its reliability.
- Open Access
Compression–Shear Specimen Stress-State Response and Distribution Characteristics with Wide Stress Triaxiality
Conventional methods for studying the plastic behavior of materials involve uniaxial tension and uniaxial compression. However, in the metal rolling process, the deformation zone undergoes a complex loading of multidirectional compression and shear. Characterizing the corresponding plastic evolution process online poses challenges, and the existing specimen structures struggle to accurately replicate the deformation-induced loading characteristics. In this study, we aimed to design a compression–shear composite loading specimen that closely mimics the actual processing conditions. The goal was to investigate how the specimen structure influences the stress–strain response in the deformation zone. Using commercial finite element software, a compression–shear composite loading specimen was meticulously designed. Five 304 stainless steel specimens underwent uniaxial compressive loading, with variation angles between the preset notch angle (PNA) of the specimen and compression direction. We employed digital image correlation methods to capture the impact of the PNA on the strain field during compression. Additionally, we aimed to elucidate the plastic response resulting from the stress state of the specimen, particularly in relation to specimen fracture and microstructural evolution.
Open AccessCompression–Shear Specimen Stress-State Response and Distribution Characteristics with Wide Stress Triaxiality
Conventional methods for studying the plastic behavior of materials involve uniaxial tension and uniaxial compression. However, in the metal rolling process, the deformation zone undergoes a complex loading of multidirectional compression and shear. Characterizing the corresponding plastic evolution process online poses challenges, and the existing specimen structures struggle to accurately replicate the deformation-induced loading characteristics. In this study, we aimed to design a compression–shear composite loading specimen that closely mimics the actual processing conditions. The goal was to investigate how the specimen structure influences the stress–strain response in the deformation zone. Using commercial finite element software, a compression–shear composite loading specimen was meticulously designed. Five 304 stainless steel specimens underwent uniaxial compressive loading, with variation angles between the preset notch angle (PNA) of the specimen and compression direction. We employed digital image correlation methods to capture the impact of the PNA on the strain field during compression. Additionally, we aimed to elucidate the plastic response resulting from the stress state of the specimen, particularly in relation to specimen fracture and microstructural evolution.