Shreya Manna

In developed nations, 4D-computed tomography (4D-CT)-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become the standard for treating lung carcinoma patients, with the primary goal of achieving disease cure. However, its usage in India remains limited. Here, we compared target volume delineation for radical radiation planning in patients with locally advanced lung carcinoma using helical free-breathing CT (FBCT) and 4D-CT. In addition, we assessed the adequacy of a 5-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin with 4D-CT planning. Fifty patients with locally advanced lung cancer were enrolled in the study. Each patient underwent contouring based on 4D-CT to generate an internal target volume, and a 5-mm PTV margin (PTV_4D) was added for radical radiation. Subsequently, each patient underwent two intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans with comparable planning and optimization parameters. One plan was based on the FBCT-based volume (PTV_3D), while the other was based on the 4D-CT-based volume (PTV_4D). PTV, organ at risk (OAR) dose, and PTV coverage by 95% of the prescribed dose (PTVD 95_3D vs. PTVD 95_4D) were compared between the two schemes. Results revealed that 4D-CT-based planning reduced PTV (mean PTV volume: 539 cc vs. 782 cc) and lowered OAR doses (mean lung dose: 13 Gy vs. 15 Gy; mean esophagus dose: 18.5 Gy vs. 21.15 Gy; mean spinal cord max dose: 35.59 Gy vs. 37.39 Gy). At 3 months after treatment imaging, 40% of the patients showed a complete response, 48% showed a partial response, 4% showed stable disease, and 8% showed progressive disease. In conclusion, 4D-CT-based radiation planning for locally advanced lung carcinoma with a reduced PTV margin of 5 mm can dramatically decrease the PTV and OAR doses without sacrificing PTV coverage compared to FBCT-based planning. However, daily online image guidance or at least a well-defined offline image guidance protocol is recommended when employing such a small PTV margin.