Shea O’connor
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Shea O’connor has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Benjamin T. Fraser
Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
1 shared publication - Larissa Robinov
Division of Forests & Lands, New Hampshire Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, Concord, NH 03301, USA
1 shared publication - Russell G. Congalton
Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA
1 shared publication - William Davidson
Division of Forests & Lands, New Hampshire Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, Concord, NH 03301, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Comparison of Unpiloted Aerial System Hardware and Software for Surveying Fine-Scale Oak Health in Oak–Pine Forests
Spongy moth (Lymantria dispar dispar) has caused considerable damage to oak trees across eastern deciduous forests. Forest management, post-outbreak, is resource intensive and typically focused on ecosystem restoration or resource loss mitigation. Some local forest managers and government partners are exploring developing technologies such as Unpiloted Aerial Systems (UASs, UAVs, or drones) to enhance their ability to gather reliable fine-scale information. However, with limited resources and the complexity of investing in hardware, software, and technical expertise, the decision to adopt UAS technologies has raised questions on their effectiveness. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abilities of two UAS surveying approaches for classifying the health of individual oak trees following a spongy moth outbreak. Combinations of two UAS multispectral sensors and two Structure from Motion (SfM)-based software are compared. The results indicate that the overall classification accuracy differed by as much as 3.8% between the hardware and software configurations. Additionally, the class-specific accuracy for ’Declining Oaks‘ differed by 5–10% (producer’s and user’s accuracies). The processing experience between open-source and commercial SfM software was also documented and demonstrated a 25-to-75-fold increase in processing duration. These results point out major considerations of time and software accessibility when selecting between hardware and software options for fine-scale forest mapping. Based on these findings, future stakeholders can decide between cost, practicality, technical complexity, and effectiveness.
Open AccessA Comparison of Unpiloted Aerial System Hardware and Software for Surveying Fine-Scale Oak Health in Oak–Pine Forests
Spongy moth (Lymantria dispar dispar) has caused considerable damage to oak trees across eastern deciduous forests. Forest management, post-outbreak, is resource intensive and typically focused on ecosystem restoration or resource loss mitigation. Some local forest managers and government partners are exploring developing technologies such as Unpiloted Aerial Systems (UASs, UAVs, or drones) to enhance their ability to gather reliable fine-scale information. However, with limited resources and the complexity of investing in hardware, software, and technical expertise, the decision to adopt UAS technologies has raised questions on their effectiveness. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abilities of two UAS surveying approaches for classifying the health of individual oak trees following a spongy moth outbreak. Combinations of two UAS multispectral sensors and two Structure from Motion (SfM)-based software are compared. The results indicate that the overall classification accuracy differed by as much as 3.8% between the hardware and software configurations. Additionally, the class-specific accuracy for ’Declining Oaks‘ differed by 5–10% (producer’s and user’s accuracies). The processing experience between open-source and commercial SfM software was also documented and demonstrated a 25-to-75-fold increase in processing duration. These results point out major considerations of time and software accessibility when selecting between hardware and software options for fine-scale forest mapping. Based on these findings, future stakeholders can decide between cost, practicality, technical complexity, and effectiveness.