CBC. Bernard

C. Bernard

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


C. Bernard has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • A. Havet

    UMR 1048 French National Institute for Agronomical Research INRA AgroParisTech SAD APT Bâtiment EGER BP 01 78850 Thiverval‐Grignon, France e‐mail

    1 shared publication
  • Dufour Annie

    ISARA-Lyon

    1 shared publication
  • E. Tchakérian

    Institut de l'Élevage Parc scientifique Agropolis 149, rue de Bercy 34397 Montpellier cedex 5, France e‐mail: edmond.tchakerian@inst‐elevage.asso.fr

    1 shared publication
  • Isabelle Mauz

    Cemagref, centre de Grenoble, UR DTGR, Développement des territoires montagnards, 2 rue de la Papeterie, BP 76, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex

    1 shared publication
  • J. Pluvinage

    French National Institute for Agronomical Research INRA‐SAD Montpellier UMR Innovation 2, place Pierre Viala 34060 Montpellier cedex 1, France e‐mail

    1 shared publication
  • J. Rémy

    French National Institute for Agronomical Research INRA 65 Bd de Brandebourg 94205 Ivry sur Seine cedex, France e‐mail

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Multifunctionality in Agriculture and its Agents: Regional Comparisons

    by A. Dufour, I. Mauz, J. Rémy, C. Bernard, L. Dobremez, A. Havet, Y. Pauthenet, J. Pluvinage, E. Tchakérian

    Drawing on a multidisciplinary survey carried out in three contrasting areas of the Rhône‐Alpes Region in France, this article investigates how the concept of multifunctionality has been understood and appropriated. After a retrospective look at French agricultural policy, the first part presents our analytical framework, which is inspired by the sociology of action. The second part analyses the socio‐political issues of farming in each area and the compromises established around the various functions attributed to agriculture. The third part highlights the different ways of considering and practising farming, as well as the social expectations towards agriculture. This regional comparison shows that professional identities are constructed at local levels in different places: the farms and their neighbourhood, local groups and agricultural organisations. Local agreements on agriculture and the construction of professional identities take into account multifunctionality in specific ways, which depend on the social and economic relationships that the farmers have established with their fellow citizens.