Ke Zhao

This study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the aerodynamic performance and static stability of hybrid wing aircraft, considering the interference of counter-rotating embedded propellers. Extensive numerical verification has been carried out, including comparisons with NASA’s high-lift propeller (HLP) data. Three configurations—no propeller, counter-rotating inboard-upwash (CNIU) and counter-rotating outboard-upwash (CNOU) are defined to analyze the aerodynamic force/moment characteristics and flow field structures over a range of angles of attack from −6° to 26°, in conjunction with crosswind velocities of 0, 5, 10, and 15 m/s. The propeller-induced slipstream alters the aircraft’s fundamental performance by modifying wing pressure distributions and vortex systems. Specifically, the CNIU configuration increases the low-pressure areas on both the fuselage and outer wing upper surfaces, enhancing the lift-to-drag ratio by 28.4% at low angles of attack. In contrast, the CNOU configuration improves longitudinal steady-static margin by 27.4% under typical conditions and demonstrates superior lateral static stability under 10 m/s leftward crosswind conditions. For engineering applications in the aerodynamic design of such aircraft, the CNIU configuration is recommended for high cruise efficiency, whereas the CNOU configuration is preferred for flight stability.

The airfoil is the foundation of an aircraft, and its characteristics have a significant impact on those of the aircraft. Conventional airfoil design mainly focuses on improving aerodynamic performance, while flying wing airfoil designs should also consider layout stability and stealth performance. The design requirements for an airfoil vary with its position on the flying wing layout aircraft based on corresponding spanwise flow field characteristics. By analyzing the spanwise flow characteristics of the flying wing, partition design models for flying wing airfoils were established in this study, and a series of flying wing airfoil designs that consider aerodynamics and aerodynamic/stealth were implemented. Then, the designed airfoils were configured on a three-dimensional X-47B layout for testing and verification. The results showed that the aerodynamic design and the aerodynamic/stealth design exhibited significant improvements in terms for aerodynamic and longitudinal trimming characteristics. However, the cruise drag performance of the aerodynamic/stealth design was slightly worse than that of the aerodynamic design, although the longitudinal moment trimming characteristics were basically the same. The stealth characteristics of the aerodynamic/stealth design had significant advantages, indicating that there were weak contradictions between the aerodynamic, stealth, and trimming requirements in the design of the flying wing.