Mengzhang Xie

Objective: Periacetabular tumors, especially in young to middle‐aged patients with invasive benign tumors or low‐grade malignant tumors involving type II or II + III, present significant challenges due to their rarity and the complexity of the anatomical and biomechanical structures involved. The primary difficulty lies in balancing the need to avoid unfavorable oncological outcomes while maintaining postoperative hip joint function during surgical resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of a surgical method involving partial weight‐bearing acetabular preservation combined with the use of an uncontaminated femoral head autograft to reconstruct the segmental bone defect after intra‐articular resection of the tumorous joint, providing a solution that ensures both oncological safety and functional preservation of the hip joint in these patients.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with a follow‐up period of at least 36 months. From January 2010 to October 2020, we reviewed 20 cases of patients under 60 year of age with periacetabular invasive benign tumors or primary low‐grade malignant tumors. All patients underwent reconstruction of the tumorous joint using autologous femoral head grafts. Data collected included patient age, gender, tumor type, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), patient survival rates, postoperative tumor recurrence, and surgical complications. To analyze the data, we utilized various statistical methods, including descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographics and clinical characteristics, and paired sample t‐tests to compare preoperative and postoperative scores.Results: The study included 20 patients, and a total median follow‐up was 83 months. Their pathologic diagnoses comprised 13 giant cell tumors (GCTs), 5 chondrosarcomas, one chondroblastoma, and 1 leiomyosarcoma. Postoperatively, the median differences in vertical and horizontal center of rotation (COR) were 3.8 and 4.0 mm. Median limb length discrepancy (LLD) postoperatively was 5.7 mm (range, 2.3–17.8 mm). Two patients (10%) experienced delayed wound healing, resolved with antibiotics and early surgical debridement. One patient experienced dislocation 3 months postoperatively, which was promptly addressed under general anesthesia without further dislocation.Conclusion: Through multiplanar osteotomy with limited margins, femoral head autograft, and uncemented total hip replacement for pelvic segmental bone defects in selected patients in type II or II + III appears to be an encouraging limb‐sparing surgery worthy of consideration for carefully selected patients.

Bone tumors, particularly osteosarcoma, are prevalent among children and adolescents. This ailment has emerged as the second most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality in adolescents. Conventional treatment methods comprise extensive surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Consequently, the management of bone tumors and bone regeneration poses significant clinical challenges. Photothermal tumor therapy has attracted considerable attention owing to its minimal invasiveness and high selectivity. However, key challenges have limited its widespread clinical use. Enhancing the tumor specificity of photosensitizers through targeting or localized activation holds potential for better outcomes with fewer adverse effects. Combinations with chemotherapies or immunotherapies also present avenues for improvement. In this review, we provide an overview of the most recent strategies aimed at overcoming the limitations of photothermal therapy (PTT), along with current research directions in the context of bone tumors, including (1) target strategies, (2) photothermal therapy combined with multiple therapies (immunotherapies, chemotherapies, and chemodynamic therapies, magnetic, and photodynamic therapies), and (3) bifunctional scaffolds for photothermal therapy and bone regeneration. We delve into the pros and cons of these combination methods and explore current research focal points. Lastly, we address the challenges and prospects of photothermal combination therapy.