Min Ma

Background The burden of valvular heart disease (VHD) is rising rapidly globally, accompanied by substantial geographical disparities. Although altitude may influence cardiovascular system, no community-based studies have yet explored altitudinal differences in VHD epidemiology. Objective This study aims to investigate the prevalence, spectrum and aetiology of VHD in different altitude areas. Methods We conducted two sequential community-based echocardiography screening programmes in Yunnan Province of China and included 5059 eligible participants aged 35 years and older. The multivariable Poisson regression models with robust variance were performed to assess the association of different altitude groups with VHD and its subtypes. Results The prevalence of overall VHD, clinically significant VHD and clinically significant regurgitant VHD was 36.7%, 2.5% and 2.4%, respectively. After stratification by altitude, the prevalence of any VHD among participants in the Conclusions Adults living at high altitudes have a higher prevalence risk of VHD; significant altitudinal differences exist in the characteristics and aetiology of VHD. The findings could provide insights into primary prevention and early screening for VHD in low- and middle-income countries where a majority of the population lives at high altitudes.

Background: The relationship between different grades of compliance to antihypertensive medication and blood pressure (BP) control rate remains unclear. This study highlighted the Chinese Basic Public Health Service (BPHS) program upgraded antihypertension medication compliance to improve the blood pressure control rate contributing to the UN sustainable development goal of lowering chronic illness fatalities by one‐third by 2030. Methods: In 2015, 1254 hypertensive patients aged ≥ 35 years were selected in the baseline survey in Yunnan Province by a multistage stratified random sampling method and followed up from 2018 to 2022. Then, they were divided into three groups by tertiles as antihypertensive medicine compliance “poor,” “intermittent,” and “sustained” groups. Then, the robust variance Poisson regression models were performed to estimate the association between three groups and the number of referrals. Kaplan–Meier curves calculated the cumulative risk of onset and survival probability of cardiovascular events from three medication compliance groups. Results: A total of 1254 hypertension patients were included in the study; 992, 1218, 1121, 1066, and 999 hypertension patients were followed up annually. From the baseline to last follow‐up, systolic BP declined with the largest decrease in the sustained group (2015: 152.88 ± 21.64 mmHg vs. 2022: 134.61 ± 10.49 mmHg, p < 0.05) and the least decrease in the poor group (2015: 157.07 ± 15.37 mmHg vs. 2022: 140.33 ± 12.04 mmHg, p < 0.05). Under the management of BPHS, the BP control rate of all three groups increased significantly. Compared with the baseline, the control rate in the sustained group reached 70% in 2022 ( p < 0.01). The number of referrals from the poor group was 11.5%, higher compared with the sustained group (IRR = 1.115 and 95% CI: 1.043–1.193). The poor group also had the highest probability of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The survival probability in the sustained group was the highest and kept at 0.950 at the end of 5 years. Conclusions: High‐grade compliance to antihypertensive drugs significantly improves BP control rate and reduces the risk of CVD events and mortality. The decline of medication compliance grades is closely related to decreasing BP control rate and increased risk of CVD and mortality.

Global Heart is the official and primary publication of the World Heart Federation, offering a platform for the dissemination of knowledge on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programmes in the area of cardiovascular disease. Global Heart welcomes research results, points of view and educational material on the prevention, treatment and control of cardiovascular disease with a special focus on low and middle-income countries which are facing the brunt of epidemiological transition.Global Heart strongly encourages authors to adhere to CONSORT, STROBE, STARD, and PRISMA guidelines for reporting of clinical trials, observational studies, diagnostic test accuracy papers, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Authors are required for submission to download and complete the appropriate Equator Network checklist: http://www.equator-network.org/.