Terese Louise Schmidberger Karlsen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Terese Louise Schmidberger Karlsen has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
2 shared publications - Trude Rakel Balstad
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
2 shared publications - Are Korsnes Kristensen
Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
1 shared publication - Erik Torbjørn Løhre
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
1 shared publication - Eva Hofsli
Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
1 shared publication - Ganna S. Westwik
Cancer Clinic, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Health Trust, 7601 Levanger, Norway
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 32 (11) , 620
Serum miRNA Signatures in Cancer Cachexia Depend on Systemic Inflammation
Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome marked by involuntary weight and muscle loss, often driven by systemic inflammation. This multicenter, longitudinal observational study investigated circulating microRNA (miRNA) profiles in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, comparing those with and without cachexia and inflammation. A total of 168 patients were categorized into four groups based on cachexia and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Cachexia was defined using the 2011 consensus criteria, incorporating weight loss, low BMI, and sarcopenia. Patients with both cachexia and systemic inflammation exhibited significantly distinct miRNA profiles as well as poorer overall survival (HR 2.10, p < 0.001) compared to patients with neither condition. No significant differences were observed in patients lacking either cachexia or inflammation or both. Inflammatory cachexia emerged as a biologically distinct entity, with 82 differentially expressed miRNAs. The miR-320-family, miR-6087, miR-4488, miR-29a-3p, miR-194-5p, and miR-10a-5p were most altered, several of which are linked to muscle mass, metabolism, lipid, and protein synthesis. These findings highlight the pivotal role of systemic inflammation in cancer cachexia and support its inclusion in diagnostic criteria. Moreover, circulating miRNAs may serve as promising biomarkers for identifying cachexia in cancer patients.
- 6 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 32 (11) , 620
Open AccessSerum miRNA Signatures in Cancer Cachexia Depend on Systemic Inflammation
Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome marked by involuntary weight and muscle loss, often driven by systemic inflammation. This multicenter, longitudinal observational study investigated circulating microRNA (miRNA) profiles in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, comparing those with and without cachexia and inflammation. A total of 168 patients were categorized into four groups based on cachexia and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Cachexia was defined using the 2011 consensus criteria, incorporating weight loss, low BMI, and sarcopenia. Patients with both cachexia and systemic inflammation exhibited significantly distinct miRNA profiles as well as poorer overall survival (HR 2.10, p < 0.001) compared to patients with neither condition. No significant differences were observed in patients lacking either cachexia or inflammation or both. Inflammatory cachexia emerged as a biologically distinct entity, with 82 differentially expressed miRNAs. The miR-320-family, miR-6087, miR-4488, miR-29a-3p, miR-194-5p, and miR-10a-5p were most altered, several of which are linked to muscle mass, metabolism, lipid, and protein synthesis. These findings highlight the pivotal role of systemic inflammation in cancer cachexia and support its inclusion in diagnostic criteria. Moreover, circulating miRNAs may serve as promising biomarkers for identifying cachexia in cancer patients.
- Open Access
- 11 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 31 (5) , 2748-2757
Parenteral Nutrition in Palliative Cancer Care: Detrimental, Futile, or Beneficial?
Palliative cancer care patients may live for a long time, but malnutrition worsens the prognosis. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is suitable for replenishing a calorie deficit, but its advantages and tolerance late in the cancer trajectory are debated. We examined symptom development in hospitalized patients with and without PN. A total of 21 palliative cancer care patients receiving PN and 155 palliative cancer care patients not receiving PN during hospitalization in a specialized unit were retrospectively compared. We studied symptom intensity at admission, symptom relief during the hospital stay, and survival. The patients had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, a mean age of 70 years, and their median ECOG performance status was III. Symptom burden at admission was similar in the compared groups. Symptom relief during hospitalization was also similar. However, patients already on PN at admission reported more nausea and patients receiving PN during hospitalization reported better nausea relief compared to patients not receiving this intervention. Overall median survival was less than two months and similar in the compared groups. Based on a limited number of observations and a suboptimal study design, we were not able to demonstrate an increased symptom burden for palliative cancer care patients receiving PN late in the disease trajectory.
- 11 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 31 (5) , 2748-2757
Open AccessParenteral Nutrition in Palliative Cancer Care: Detrimental, Futile, or Beneficial?
Palliative cancer care patients may live for a long time, but malnutrition worsens the prognosis. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is suitable for replenishing a calorie deficit, but its advantages and tolerance late in the cancer trajectory are debated. We examined symptom development in hospitalized patients with and without PN. A total of 21 palliative cancer care patients receiving PN and 155 palliative cancer care patients not receiving PN during hospitalization in a specialized unit were retrospectively compared. We studied symptom intensity at admission, symptom relief during the hospital stay, and survival. The patients had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, a mean age of 70 years, and their median ECOG performance status was III. Symptom burden at admission was similar in the compared groups. Symptom relief during hospitalization was also similar. However, patients already on PN at admission reported more nausea and patients receiving PN during hospitalization reported better nausea relief compared to patients not receiving this intervention. Overall median survival was less than two months and similar in the compared groups. Based on a limited number of observations and a suboptimal study design, we were not able to demonstrate an increased symptom burden for palliative cancer care patients receiving PN late in the disease trajectory.