Zhilin Xiao
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Zhilin Xiao has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Pu Zeng
Natural Resources and Planning Bureau of Ya’an City, Ya’an 625099, China
1 shared publication - Qun Zhang
Sichuan Institute of Land and Space Ecological Restoration and Geological Hazard Prevention, Chengdu 610036, China
1 shared publication - Xiaoqiong Zhang
Natural Resources and Planning Bureau of Ya’an City, Ya’an 625099, China
1 shared publication - Xiaoyan Zhao
Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
1 shared publication - Zhigang Ma
Sichuan Institute of Land and Space Ecological Restoration and Geological Hazard Prevention, Chengdu 610036, China
1 shared publication - Zhongyuan Xu
Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 16 (10) , 4044
Derivation of Landslide Rainfall Thresholds by Geostatistical Methods in Southwest China
Deriving rainfall thresholds is one of the most convenient and effective empirical methods for formulating landslide warnings. The previous rainfall threshold models only considered the threshold values for areas with landslide data. This study focuses on obtaining a threshold for each single landslide via the geostatistical interpolation of historical landslide–rainfall data. We collect the occurrence times and locations of landslides, along with the hourly rainfall data, for Dazhou. We integrate the short-term and long-term rainfall data preceding the landslide occurrences, categorizing them into four groups for analysis: 1 h–7 days (H1–7), 12 h–7 days (H12–D7), 24 h–7 days (H24–D7), and 72 h–7 days (H72–D7). Then, we construct a rainfall threshold distribution map based on the 2014–2020 data by means of Kriging interpolation. This process involves applying different splitting coefficients to distinguish the landslides triggered by short-term versus long-term rainfall. Subsequently, we validate these thresholds and splitting coefficients using the dataset for 2021. The results show that the best splitting coefficients for H1–D7, H12–D7, H24–D7, and H72–D7 are around 0.19, 0.52, 0.55, and 0.80, respectively. The accuracy of the predictions increases with the duration of the short-term rainfall, from 48% for H1–D7 to 67% for H72–D7. The performance of these threshold models indicates their potential for practical application in the sustainable development of geo-hazard prevention. Finally, we discuss the reliability and applicability of this method by considering various factors, including the influence of the interpolation techniques, data quality, weather forecast, and human activities.
- 12 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 16 (10) , 4044
Open AccessDerivation of Landslide Rainfall Thresholds by Geostatistical Methods in Southwest China
Deriving rainfall thresholds is one of the most convenient and effective empirical methods for formulating landslide warnings. The previous rainfall threshold models only considered the threshold values for areas with landslide data. This study focuses on obtaining a threshold for each single landslide via the geostatistical interpolation of historical landslide–rainfall data. We collect the occurrence times and locations of landslides, along with the hourly rainfall data, for Dazhou. We integrate the short-term and long-term rainfall data preceding the landslide occurrences, categorizing them into four groups for analysis: 1 h–7 days (H1–7), 12 h–7 days (H12–D7), 24 h–7 days (H24–D7), and 72 h–7 days (H72–D7). Then, we construct a rainfall threshold distribution map based on the 2014–2020 data by means of Kriging interpolation. This process involves applying different splitting coefficients to distinguish the landslides triggered by short-term versus long-term rainfall. Subsequently, we validate these thresholds and splitting coefficients using the dataset for 2021. The results show that the best splitting coefficients for H1–D7, H12–D7, H24–D7, and H72–D7 are around 0.19, 0.52, 0.55, and 0.80, respectively. The accuracy of the predictions increases with the duration of the short-term rainfall, from 48% for H1–D7 to 67% for H72–D7. The performance of these threshold models indicates their potential for practical application in the sustainable development of geo-hazard prevention. Finally, we discuss the reliability and applicability of this method by considering various factors, including the influence of the interpolation techniques, data quality, weather forecast, and human activities.