Nayim Hossain

Taking an actual 3MW steel–concrete composite wind turbine tower as an example, a finite element model of the tower structure was established, and static bearing capacity and dynamic time history response analyses were performed to identify the locations where the structure is prone to failure. On this basis, the fatigue lives of the turbine tower at the most unfavorable locations were predicted using linear cumulative damage theory, and the fatigue reliability at the corresponding locations of the structure was calculated using the kriging–subset simulation method. The most dangerous locations of the tower that are most prone to failure are as follows: the bottom of the leeward side of the upper steel tube, the flange of the steel tube, the bolt-hole imprinting surface of the flange, the leeward side of the transition tube, and the top of the leeward side of the concrete tube. The failure risk of the flange and bolt-hole imprinting surface of the upper steel tube is relatively high, followed by that of the transition tube. This indicates that special attention should be given to the design and daily maintenance of this part. The fatigue resistance of the tower can be enhanced by improving the strength of the flange plate or increasing the number of bolts and strengthening the transition tube.

Based on the WindPACT-3MW wind turbine tower commonly used in wind power engineering, a finite element model (FEM) of a hybrid wind turbine tower combining an upper steel tube with a lower steel truss is designed and established. On this basis, a static optimization analysis, wind-induced vibration analysis, and fatigue life analysis of the hybrid tower structure are performed. The results show that under the same design parameters, the overall stiffness and static bearing capacity of the tower structure can be significantly improved by using subdivided truss webs, increasing the truss height as much as possible and increasing the width of the truss base appropriately. Under normal operation conditions, the response of the tower structure in the along-wind direction is significantly greater than the response in the crosswind direction, indicating that the aerodynamic thrust generated by the rotation of the blades is the main factor causing the wind-induced vibration of the tower structure. For the tower structure analyzed in this study, when considering the entire range of wind speeds from the cut-in wind speed to the cut-out wind speed, the fatigue life of the structure is 38.5 years.