Daniela Damian
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Daniela Damian has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Björn Regnell
Department of Computer Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
1 shared publication - Casper Lassenius
Aalto University
1 shared publication - Christian Engblom
Oy LM Ericsson Ab, Kirkkonummi, Finland
1 shared publication - Johan Linåker
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
1 shared publication Marcelo Cataldo
Uber Advanced Technologies Group
1 shared publication- Maria Paasivaara
Aalto University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Community Strategy Framework -- How to obtain Influence on Requirements in Meritocratic Open Source Software Communities?
Context: In the Requirements Engineering (RE) process of an Open Source Software (OSS) community, an involved firm is a stakeholder among many. Conflicting agendas may create miss-alignment with the firm's internal requirements strategy. In communities with meritocratic governance or with aspects thereof, a firm has the opportunity to affect the RE process in line with their own agenda by gaining influence through active and symbiotic engagements. Objective: The focus of this study has been to identify what aspects that firms should consider when they assess their need of influencing the RE process in an OSS community, as well as what engagement practices that should be considered in order to gain this influence. Method: Using a design science approach, 21 interviews with 18 industry professionals from 12 different software-intensive firms were conducted to explore, design and validate an artifact for the problem context. Results: A Community Strategy Framework (CSF) is presented to help firms create community strategies that describe if and why they need influence on the RE process in a specific (meritocratic) OSS community, and how the firm could gain it. The framework consists of aspects and engagement practices. The aspects help determine how important an OSS project and its community is from business and technical perspectives. A community perspective is used when considering the feasibility and potential in gaining influence. The engagement practices are intended as a tool-box for how a firm can engage with a community in order to build influence needed. Conclusion: It is concluded from interview-based validation that the proposed CSF may provide support for firms in creating and tailoring community strategies and help them to focus resources on communities that matter and gain the influence needed on their respective RE processes.
Open AccessA Community Strategy Framework -- How to obtain Influence on Requirements in Meritocratic Open Source Software Communities?
Context: In the Requirements Engineering (RE) process of an Open Source Software (OSS) community, an involved firm is a stakeholder among many. Conflicting agendas may create miss-alignment with the firm's internal requirements strategy. In communities with meritocratic governance or with aspects thereof, a firm has the opportunity to affect the RE process in line with their own agenda by gaining influence through active and symbiotic engagements. Objective: The focus of this study has been to identify what aspects that firms should consider when they assess their need of influencing the RE process in an OSS community, as well as what engagement practices that should be considered in order to gain this influence. Method: Using a design science approach, 21 interviews with 18 industry professionals from 12 different software-intensive firms were conducted to explore, design and validate an artifact for the problem context. Results: A Community Strategy Framework (CSF) is presented to help firms create community strategies that describe if and why they need influence on the RE process in a specific (meritocratic) OSS community, and how the firm could gain it. The framework consists of aspects and engagement practices. The aspects help determine how important an OSS project and its community is from business and technical perspectives. A community perspective is used when considering the feasibility and potential in gaining influence. The engagement practices are intended as a tool-box for how a firm can engage with a community in order to build influence needed. Conclusion: It is concluded from interview-based validation that the proposed CSF may provide support for firms in creating and tailoring community strategies and help them to focus resources on communities that matter and gain the influence needed on their respective RE processes.
- 14 January 2019
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Software
- Vol. 36 (1) , 11-14
The Social Developer: The Future of Software Development [Guest Editors' Introduction]
Contemporary Software Engineering has inevitably become much more social. Due to the size, complexity, and diversity of today's software systems, there is a need to interact across organizational, geographical, cultural, and socioeconomic boundaries. Large-scale software development now implies active user involvement and requires close cooperation and collaboration between team members and all types of development activities. Members of software projects across all roles must communicate and interact continuously with other project members as well as with a variety of stakeholders, such as users, analysts, suppliers, customers, and business partners. This theme issue aims to inform software engineering practitioners about current trends and recent advances in research and practice of sociotechnical analysis and support for large-scale software development.
- 14 January 2019
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Software
- Vol. 36 (1) , 11-14
The Social Developer: The Future of Software Development [Guest Editors' Introduction]
Contemporary Software Engineering has inevitably become much more social. Due to the size, complexity, and diversity of today's software systems, there is a need to interact across organizational, geographical, cultural, and socioeconomic boundaries. Large-scale software development now implies active user involvement and requires close cooperation and collaboration between team members and all types of development activities. Members of software projects across all roles must communicate and interact continuously with other project members as well as with a variety of stakeholders, such as users, analysts, suppliers, customers, and business partners. This theme issue aims to inform software engineering practitioners about current trends and recent advances in research and practice of sociotechnical analysis and support for large-scale software development.
- Open Access
- 10 January 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Empirical Software Engineering
- Vol. 22 (6) , 2892-2936
Managing the requirements flow from strategy to release in large-scale agile development: a case study at Ericsson
- 10 January 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Empirical Software Engineering
- Vol. 22 (6) , 2892-2936
Open AccessManaging the requirements flow from strategy to release in large-scale agile development: a case study at Ericsson