Wijdan Awad Almutiri

Background: Monitoring and managing gestational weight gain (GWG) during antenatal care (ANC) is linked to better maternal and neonatal outcomes. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines are based on pre-pregnancy BMI and reduce obstetric risks. Pregnant women’s views and healthcare providers’ (HCPs) practices are key to effective GWG counseling. This study aims to: (1) investigate the proportion of women who received GWG advice per IOM guidelines, and (2) explore HCP practices and views on GWG counseling. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of Saudi pregnant women who delivered within one year of the study and HCPs who provided ANC. Women provided data on demographics, pre-pregnancy BMI, recall of GWG advice, and their target GWG. HCPs rated their knowledge and counseling practices. Results: Of 1151 women, 48.8% were pre-pregnancy overweight or obese, 47.6% were normal weight, and 3.6% were underweight. Most women (74.5%) received no GWG advice, and only 8.8% followed IOM guidelines. Women with obesity and overweight were more likely to receive correct advice (15.5% and 11.5%), compared to 5.3% of normal-weight and 2.4% underweight women. Overweight and obese women were more likely to define the correct GWG (AOR = 2.84 and 5.85). Receiving proper advice greatly increased the likelihood of proper GWG definition (AOR = 7.13). Among 28 HCPs, 53.6% reported that women rarely ask about the GWG target. Nearly 93% of them weigh women at each visit, but only 21.4% set personalized GWG targets. Most HCPs (82.2%) viewed discussing GWG as a high priority, and 70% felt confident providing guidance on GWG, diet, and exercise. Conclusions: Many women receive no GWG guidance, and most advice does not align with IOM guidelines. Enhancing Saudi women’s knowledge regarding GWG targets through health education, in conjunction with ongoing medical education for healthcare professionals concerning guidelines for GWG, represents modifiable factors and a critical opportunity to foster healthier pregnancy outcomes.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective long-acting contraceptives. However, pain associated with insertion deters some women and impacts satisfaction. This systematic review critically evaluates the effectiveness of local anesthetics, misoprostol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and conscious sedation for managing pain associated with IUD insertion. A comprehensive database search including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest was conducted from inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs assessing interventions for IUD insertion pain were included. Case reports, non-randomized studies, and non-English papers were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted data on pain outcomes and adverse effects. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. Thirty-nine RCTs (n = 12,345 women) met the inclusion criteria. Topical lidocaine effectively reduced pain on consistent findings across multiple high-quality RCTs. Misoprostol pretreatment facilitated easier insertions through cervical ripening. However, evidence for NSAIDs was inconclusive, with some RCTs finding no additional benefits versus placebo. Results also remained unclear for nitrous oxide conscious sedation due to variability in protocols. Nulliparity predicted higher reported pain consistently. Lidocaine and misoprostol show promise for minimizing IUD insertion pain and difficulty. Further optimization is required to standardize conscious sedation and fully evaluate NSAIDs. Improving pain management may increase favorable experiences and uptake of this reliable method.

Background: Post-operative pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, patient comfort, and satisfaction. Peripheral nerve blockade, or lumbar plexus block (LPB), has been widely used for analgesia and regional anesthesia. This study explored the existing literature to determine the efficacy of continuous lumbar plexus blockade in managing post-operative pain following hip or femur surgery. Methods: Reviewers comprehensively searched electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed scholarly articles reporting the efficacy of lumbar plexus block in managing post-operative pain after orthopedic surgery. The potential articles were carefully selected and assessed for the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias assessment tool. Data were systematically extracted and analyzed. Results: The literature search yielded 206 articles, 20 of which were randomized controlled trials. Lumbar plexus block demonstrated superior pain relief compared to conventional pain management approaches like general anesthetics. In addition, LPB reduced patients’ overall opioid consumption compared to controls, reduced adverse effects, and enhanced functional recovery, which underlines the broader positive impact of meticulous pain management. More patients could walk more than 40 feet after the second day post-operatively among the lumbar plexus group (14.7%) compared to the continuous femoral group (1.3%). Other parameters, including cortisol levels and hemodynamic stability, were evaluated, showing comparable outcomes. Conclusions: Lumbar plexus block is effective in pain management after orthopedic surgery, as shown by the lower pain scores and less opioid consumption. Additionally, patient satisfaction was relatively higher in LPB-treated patients compared to other approaches like general anesthesia.