Jae-Woon Baek

A method for quantifying tebufenpyrad residues in greenhouse sandy loam soils was developed and validated. Given the strong sorption (high K_oc) of tebufenpyrad to mineral–organic domains in soils, desorption-limited and partially bound residues may occur, so sample preparation methods should actively promote desorption to minimize underestimation. The QuEChERS extraction procedure was optimized by adjusting pre-wetting volume and aqueous medium to enhance desorption prior to salt-induced acetonitrile partitioning. Pre-wetting volume markedly affected phase separation and recovery: acceptable ranges were 80.2–82.0% at 5–10 mL, 94.6% at 15 mL, and 99.1% at 20 mL, while a supra-quantitative value of 119.6% was observed at 25 mL, likely due to salt-induced contraction of the acetonitrile layer, which artificially concentrates tebufenpyrad. Among pre-wetting reagents, 15 mL of 0.05% HCl yielded the highest desorption in field soil (0.20 mg/kg), compared with distilled water (0.13 mg/kg), formic acid (0.16 mg/kg), and EDTA (0.14–0.17 mg/kg). The final method employed 15 mL of 0.05% HCl for pre-wetting, followed by acetonitrile extraction and MgSO₄/NaCl partitioning. Linearity (r² = 0.9990) was achieved over 1.25 to 100 ng/mL, with an LOQ of 0.005 mg/kg and average recoveries of 86.7%, 99.8%, and 98.5% at 0.01, 0.1, and 30 mg/kg, respectively (RSD ≤ 6.2%), satisfying SANTE criteria. In greenhouse soil, residues declined from 1.9 to 0.3 mg/kg at the recommended rate (1×) and from 4.8 to 0.7 mg/kg at the doubled rate (2×) within 46 d (DT₅₀ ≈ 20 d). This validated QuEChERS method provides a reliable analytical basis for evaluating tebufenpyrad dissipation in soil.

Pencycuron is a fungicide whose maximum residue limit (MRL) in eggplant is either set at very low levels (0.02 mg/kg in European Union) or remains unestablished in many countries, necessitating stringent pesticide management. To enable timely interventions by farmers and regulators, pre-harvest residue limits (PHRLs) propose maximum allowable pesticide concentrations for each day during the pre-harvest period. An analytical method was developed to conduct residue determination trials, demonstrating that graphitized carbon black (GCB) effectively removes eggplant matrices during sample preparation. The LC-MS/MS method was established with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.005 mg/kg, recovery rates ranging from 102.6% to 106.1% with relative standard deviation (RSD; 2.3–6.4%), and a matrix effect (%ME) of +8.1%. Residue analysis revealed a concentration of 0.045 mg/kg at 0 days after treatment (DAT), decreasing to 0.006 mg/kg at 14 DAT. The residue dynamics followed a first-order kinetic model, as confirmed by the F-test, with a rate constant of 0.1405. Therefore, the half-life was determined to be 4.9 d. Based on the MRL value of 0.02 mg/kg at 0 days before harvest (DBH), the PHRL was determined using both k and k_min, resulting in values of 0.04 mg/kg and 0.02 mg/kg at 5 days and 0.08 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg at 10 DBH, respectively. Using k_min yields more conservative results, which ensures food safety under conditions of slower degradation rates.

Rice straw is used as livestock feed and compost. Ferimzone and tricyclazole, common fungicides for rice blast control, can be found in high concentrations in rice straw after unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spraying, potentially affecting livestock and human health through pesticide residues. In this study, an optimized method for the analysis of the two fungicides in rice straw was developed using the improved QuEChERS method. After the optimization of water and solvent volume, extraction conditions including ethyl acetate (EtOAc), acetonitrile (MeCN), a mixed solvent, and MeCN containing 1% acetic acid were compared. Different salts, including unbuffered sodium chloride, citrate, and acetate buffer salts, were compared for partitioning. Among the preparation methods, the MeCN/EtOAc mixture with unbuffered salts showed the highest recovery rates (88.1–97.9%, RSD ≤ 5.1%). To address the severe matrix effect (%ME) of rice straw, which is characterized by low moisture content and cellulose-based complex matrices, samples were purified using 25 mg each of primary–secondary amine (PSA) and octadecylsilane (C₁₈), without pesticide loss. The developed method was validated with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.005 mg/kg for target pesticides, and recovery rates at levels of 0.01, 0.1, and 2 mg/kg met the permissible range (82.3–98.9%, RSD ≤ 8.3%). The %ME ranged from −17.6% to −0.3%, indicating a negligible effect. This optimized method was subsequently applied to residue studies following multi-rotor spraying. Fungicides from all fields and treatment groups during harvest season did not exceed the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for livestock feed. This confirms that UAV spraying can be safely managed without causing excessive residues.

Enhancements to the analytical method for the determination of tricyclazole in rice samples have been applied to monitor residues during unmanned aerial spraying. The acetonitrile extraction technique QuEChERS was improved by the incorporation of ethyl acetate and 0.1% formic acid, which significantly elevated the recovery rates. Furthermore, the purification process was refined by integrating both primary–secondary amine (PSA) and C18 in the dSPE method, achieving a substantial improvement in reducing matrix effects (MEs) and increasing recovery efficiency. The optimized method demonstrated an impressive % ME value at −3.1%, with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) established at 0.01 mg/kg, and recovery rates between 94.7 and 95.6% at 0.01, 0.1, and 2 mg/kg. Using two types of adjuvants (stickers) during multi-copter spraying markedly improved the initial tricyclazole deposition on rice panicles, with residue levels initially increasing from 0.35 mg/kg to between 0.68 and 1.60 mg/kg. Residues in hulled rice at harvest (10 days post-application) remained well below the maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.7 mg/kg, ranging from 0.02 to 0.11 mg/kg, thus affirming the safety and efficacy of adjuvants in residue management.

To prevent pesticides from exceeding maximum residue limits (MRLs) in crops during export and shipment, it is necessary to manage residue levels during the pre-harvest stages. Therefore, the Republic of Korea establishes pre-harvest residue limits (PHRLs) per crop and pesticide. This study was conducted to set PHRLs for penthiopyrad and tebufenpyrad in angelica leaves, where the exceedance rates of MRLs are expected to be high. The LOQ of the analytical method used was 0.01 mg/kg and it demonstrated good linearity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.999 or higher within the quantitation range of 0.005 to 0.5 mg/kg. The recovery and storage stability accuracy values were in the range of 94.5–111.1%, within the acceptable range (70–120%, RSD ≤ 20%). The matrix effect for both pesticides was in the medium-to-strong range, and it did not significantly impact the quantitative results as a matrix-matched calibration method was employed. Using the validated method, residue concentrations of penthiopyrad 20 (%) EC and tebufenpyrad 10 (%) EC were analyzed. Both pesticides exhibited a decreasing residue trend over time. In Fields 1–3 and their integrated results, the biological half-life was within 2.6–4.0 days for penthiopyrad and 3.0–4.2 days for tebufenpyrad. The minimum value of the regression coefficient in the dissipation curve regression equation was selected as the dissipation constant. The selected dissipation constants for penthiopyrad in Fields 1–3 and their integration were 0.1221, 0.2081, 0.2162, and 0.1960. For tebufenpyrad, the dissipation constants were 0.1451, 0.0960, 0.1725, and 0.1600, respectively. The dissipation constant was used to calculate PHRL per field. Following the principles of the PHRL proposal process, residue levels (%) on PHI dates relative to MRLs were calculated, and fields for proposing PHRLs were selected. For penthiopyrad, since the residue level (%) was less than 20%, the PHRL for Field 3 with the largest dissipation constant was proposed. For tebufenpyrad, as the residue level (%) exceeded 80%, the PHRL proposal could not established. It is deemed necessary to reassess the MRL and ‘guidelines for safe use’ for tebufenpyrad in angelica leaves.