SDSrija Dutta

Srija Dutta

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Srija Dutta has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers: Protocol for a Pilot Trial of a Telehealth Social Capital Intervention for Young Black Sexual Minority Men Living With HIV

    by Marcus O Reed, McKinsey Bullock, Antonio Newman Jr, Srija Dutta, Samuel C O Opara, Tsedenia Tewodros, Kamini Doraivelu, Andrés Camacho-González, Raphiel Murden, Kristi Gamarel, et al.

    Background: Young Black sexual minority men are disproportionately affected by HIV, especially in the Southern United States. To address this, we developed Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers (B6) intervention with a goal of enhancing social capital and engagement in care among young Black sexual minority men living with HIV. However, we encountered challenges to feasibility in recruiting and engaging for an in-person intervention. Objective: The objectives of this study are to iteratively adapt the original B6 intervention for telehealth delivery (Phase 1), and pilot test the intervention through a waitlist-control trial to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and safety (Phase 2). Methods: In Phase 1, we used the assessment, decision, adaptation, production, topical experts, integration, training, and testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework to structure the iterative adaptation process of B6, working with a diverse study team and a Youth Advisory Board (YAB). After completing the preliminary adaptation process, we conducted initial Telehealth Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers (Tele-B6) pilot testing with a community partner organization. The result was a 5-week group-level intervention, delivered entirely remotely, consisting of a series of adapted activities to address bonding and bridging social capital, affirm intersectional identities, and engage in resilience-building processes. Following feedback integration from pilot-testing, we conducted Phase 2 with 60 young Black sexual minority men living with HIV recruited over the course of one year and who were randomized at the group level to either the immediate intervention or delayed (waitlist control) intervention group. Various data sources will be used to measure feasibility, acceptability, and safety, including surveys, postsession evaluation data, in-depth qualitative interviews, and review of medical records for HIV clinical outcomes. Results: Phase 1, the adaptation process of B6, began in fall 2022 and was completed in spring 2023. Phase 2, the implementation of the waitlist control trial, began in spring 2023 and concluded in summer 2024. Final follow-up assessments were completed in fall 2024 and the results of the mixed methods evaluation are expected in winter 2025. Conclusions: The adaptation process and telehealth delivery of B6 will add to the knowledge of strengths-based interventions designed to improve care engagement among young Black sexual minority men living with HIV. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05829759,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05829759 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/69961


  • Open Access

    Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers: Protocol for a Pilot Trial of a Telehealth Social Capital Intervention for Young Black Sexual Minority Men Living With HIV (Preprint)

    by Marcus O Reed, McKinsey Bullock, Antonio Newman Jr, Srija Dutta, Samuel C O Opara, Tsedenia Tewodros, Kamini Doraivelu, Andrés Camacho-González, Raphiel Murden, Kristi Gamarel, et al.

    Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Young Black sexual minority men are disproportionately affected by HIV, especially in the Southern United States. To address this, we developed Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers (B6) intervention with a goal of enhancing social capital and engagement in care among young Black sexual minority men living with HIV. However, we encountered challenges to feasibility in recruiting and engaging for an in-person intervention. Objective: The objectives of this study are to iteratively adapt the original B6 intervention for telehealth delivery (Phase 1), and pilot test the intervention through a waitlist-control trial to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and safety (Phase 2). Methods: In Phase 1, we used the assessment, decision, adaptation, production, topical experts, integration, training, and testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework to structure the iterative adaptation process of B6, working with a diverse study team and a Youth Advisory Board (YAB). After completing the preliminary adaptation process, we conducted initial Telehealth Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers (Tele-B6) pilot testing with a community partner organization. The result was a 5-week group-level intervention, delivered entirely remotely, consisting of a series of adapted activities to address bonding and bridging social capital, affirm intersectional identities, and engage in resilience-building processes. Following feedback integration from pilot-testing, we conducted Phase 2 with 60 young Black sexual minority men living with HIV recruited over the course of one year and who were randomized at the group level to either the immediate intervention or delayed (waitlist control) intervention group. Various data sources will be used to measure feasibility, acceptability, and safety, including surveys, postsession evaluation data, in-depth qualitative interviews, and review of medical records for HIV clinical outcomes. Results: Phase 1, the adaptation process of B6, began in fall 2022 and was completed in spring 2023. Phase 2, the implementation of the waitlist control trial, began in spring 2023 and concluded in summer 2024. Final follow-up assessments were completed in fall 2024 and the results of the mixed methods evaluation are expected in winter 2025. Conclusions: The adaptation process and telehealth delivery of B6 will add to the knowledge of strengths-based interventions designed to improve care engagement among young Black sexual minority men living with HIV. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05829759,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05829759

  • Open Access

    Transitioning Adolescents to Adult HIV Care in the United States: Implementation Lessons from the iTransition Intervention Pilot Trial

    by Amanda E. Tanner, Sulianie Mertus, Mohammed Sheikh Eldin Jibriel, Rakira Urquhart, Keenan Phillips, Nadia Dowshen, Srija Dutta, Madeleine H. Goldstein, Susan Lee, Kayla Knowles, et al.

    Although every youth in pediatric/adolescent HIV care will need to transition to adult-oriented care, there are no existing evidence-based interventions to optimize health through this process. Healthcare transition poses a persistent challenge to the health of youth living with HIV, which may result in gaps in care engagement, medication adherence, and viral suppression. Our process evaluation of iTransition, a multilevel mobile health (mHealth) intervention, included iterative interviews with youth, providers, and Transition Champions. These data, along with team meeting notes, highlight the important role the intervention plays in addressing healthcare transition-related challenges, positioning it to fill a critical gap for both youth and providers. It also highlights important individual (e.g., competing priorities of youth and providers), clinical (e.g., electronic health record integration), and contextual (e.g., clinical policies during COVID-19 pandemic) challenges to intervention reach and implementation. More work is needed to refine interventions to support care continuity for youth living with HIV as they transition to adult-oriented care.


  • Open Access

    Structural Influences on Methamphetamine Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men (HISTORY Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study

    by Samuel C O Opara, Sabriya L Linton, Brian W Weir, Natalie D Crawford, David P Holland, Antonio Newman Jr, McKinsey Bullock, Marcus O Reed, Srija Dutta, Kamini Doraivelu, et al.

    Background: Sexual minority men are disproportionately affected by methamphetamine use, with recent studies suggesting an increase in use specifically among Black sexual minority men. Black sexual minority men face unique structural barriers to achieving optimal health. Given its harmful effects, and in light of existing health disparities, an increase in methamphetamine use among Black sexual minority men poses a significant public health concern. Objective: The Health Impacts and Struggles to Overcome the Racial Discrimination of Yesterday (HISTORY) study is investigating the potential impacts of exposure to the census tract–level structural racism and discrimination (SRD) on methamphetamine use among Black sexual minority men in Atlanta, Georgia, and will identify intervention targets to improve prevention and treatment of methamphetamine use in this population. Methods: This study uses a mixed methods and multilevel design over a 5-year period and incorporates participatory approaches. Individual-level quantitative data will be collected from a community-based cohort of Black sexual minority men (N=300) via periodic assessment surveys, ecological momentary assessments, and medical record abstractions. Census tract–level measures of SRD will be constructed using publicly available administrative data. Qualitative data collection will include longitudinal, repeated in-depth interviews with a subset (n=40) of study participants. Finally, using a participatory group model–building process, we will build on our qualitative and quantitative data to generate causal maps of SRD and methamphetamine use among Black sexual minority men, which in turn will be translated into actionable recommendations for structural intervention. Results: Enrollment in the HISTORY study commenced in March 2023 and is anticipated to be completed by November 2024. Conclusions: The HISTORY study will serve as a crucial background upon which future structural interventions can be built, to mitigate the effects of methamphetamine use and SRD among Black sexual minority men. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/63761


  • Open Access

    Structural Influences on Methamphetamine Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men (HISTORY Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study (Preprint)

    by Samuel C O Opara, Sabriya L Linton, Brian W Weir, Natalie D Crawford, David P Holland, Antonio Newman Jr, McKinsey Bullock, Marcus O Reed, Srija Dutta, Kamini Doraivelu, et al.

    BACKGROUND Sexual minority men are disproportionately affected by methamphetamine use, with recent studies suggesting an increase in use specifically among Black sexual minority men. Black sexual minority men face unique structural barriers to achieving optimal health. Given its harmful effects, and in light of existing health disparities, an increase in methamphetamine use among Black sexual minority men poses a significant public health concern. OBJECTIVE The Health Impacts and Struggles to Overcome the Racial Discrimination of Yesterday (HISTORY) study is investigating the potential impacts of exposure to the census tract–level structural racism and discrimination (SRD) on methamphetamine use among Black sexual minority men in Atlanta, Georgia, and will identify intervention targets to improve prevention and treatment of methamphetamine use in this population. METHODS This study uses a mixed methods and multilevel design over a 5-year period and incorporates participatory approaches. Individual-level quantitative data will be collected from a community-based cohort of Black sexual minority men (N=300) via periodic assessment surveys, ecological momentary assessments, and medical record abstractions. Census tract–level measures of SRD will be constructed using publicly available administrative data. Qualitative data collection will include longitudinal, repeated in-depth interviews with a subset (n=40) of study participants. Finally, using a participatory group model–building process, we will build on our qualitative and quantitative data to generate causal maps of SRD and methamphetamine use among Black sexual minority men, which in turn will be translated into actionable recommendations for structural intervention. RESULTS Enrollment in the HISTORY study commenced in March 2023 and is anticipated to be completed by November 2024. CONCLUSIONS The HISTORY study will serve as a crucial background upon which future structural interventions can be built, to mitigate the effects of methamphetamine use and SRD among Black sexual minority men. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/63761

  • Open Access

    Clinic-level complexities prevent effective engagement of people living with HIV who are out-of-care

    by Srija Dutta, Brendan H. Pulsifer, Kaylin V. Dance, Eric P. Leue, Melissa Beaupierre, Kennedi Lowman, Jessica M. Sales, Melanie Strahm, Jeri Sumitani, Jonathan A. Colasanti, et al.

    Approximately half of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are not retained in HIV care. Although numerous studies have identified individual-level barriers to care (i.e., substance abuse, mental health, housing, transportation challenges), less is known about institutional-level barriers. We aimed to identify clinic-level barriers to HIV care and strategies to address them to better engage PLWH who have been out of care (PLWH-OOC). As part of a larger qualitative study in a Ryan White-funded HIV Clinic in Atlanta, which aimed to understand the acceptance and feasibility of community-based HIV care models to better reach PLWH-OOC, we explored barriers and facilitators of HIV care engagement. From October 2022-March 2023, 18 in-depth-interviews were conducted with HIV-care providers, administrators, social workers, and members of a Community Advisory Board (CAB) comprised of PLWH-OOC. Transcripts were coded by trained team members using a consensus approach. Several clinic-level barriers emerged: 1) the large burden placed on patients to provide proof of eligibility to receive Ryan White Program services, 2) inflexibility of provider clinic schedules, 3) inadequate processes to identify patients at risk of disengaging from care, 4) poorly-resourced hospital-to-clinic transitions, 5) inadequate systems to address primary care needs outside of HIV care, and 6) HIV stigma among medical professionals. Strategies to address these barriers included: 1) colocation of HIV and non-HIV services, 2) community-based care options that do not require patients to navigate complex transportation systems, 3) hospital and community-based peer navigation services, 4) dedicated staffing to identify and support PLWH-OOC, and 5) enhanced systems support to help patients collect the high burden of documentation required to receive subsidized HIV care. Several systems-level HIV care barriers exist and intersect with individual and community-level barriers to disproportionately affect HIV care engagement among PLWH-OOC. Findings suggest several strategies that should be considered to reach the remaining 50% of PLWH who remain out-of-care.