Runmiao Zhu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Runmiao Zhu has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chengcheng Yuan
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
1 shared publication - Jiasi Huang
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication - Kui Liu
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
1 shared publication - Liming Liu
College of Land Science and Technology China Agricultural University Beijing China
1 shared publication - Yuwen Huang
Center for Historical Geographical Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Zhen Shen
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 10 May 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in AMBIO
- Vol. 53 (10) , 1522-1540
A social–ecological approach for identifying and mapping ecosystem service trade-offs and conservation priorities in peri-urban areas
Considering both ecological and social dimensions in the assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) can facilitate acceptable and inclusive management strategies, especially in peri-urban areas characterized by intricate human–ecosystem interactions. A limited body of research, however, has mapped the plural values of ESs and their different types of trade-offs in such areas. This research aimed to execute an interdisciplinary analysis of the biophysical and social values of ESs in peri-urban Shanghai, China, through a social–ecological approach that integrates spatial biophysical assessment with participatory mapping. Trade-off analysis in both ES types and ES valuations were then conducted, and multicriteria decision-making was applied for conservation. Our results reveal that trade-off intensities were lower within the social values compared to the biophysical values. Within both value dimensions, relatively stronger trade-offs were found between food production and other ESs. Areas with both high biophysical and social values were infrequently observed across ESs. Based on the characteristics of diverse values, our study identified priority conservation areas and provided management implications. We argue that adopting the integrated social–ecological perspective in sustainable environmental management contributes to the realization of harmonious coexistence between people and nature in peri-urban areas.
- 10 May 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in AMBIO
- Vol. 53 (10) , 1522-1540
A social–ecological approach for identifying and mapping ecosystem service trade-offs and conservation priorities in peri-urban areas
Considering both ecological and social dimensions in the assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) can facilitate acceptable and inclusive management strategies, especially in peri-urban areas characterized by intricate human–ecosystem interactions. A limited body of research, however, has mapped the plural values of ESs and their different types of trade-offs in such areas. This research aimed to execute an interdisciplinary analysis of the biophysical and social values of ESs in peri-urban Shanghai, China, through a social–ecological approach that integrates spatial biophysical assessment with participatory mapping. Trade-off analysis in both ES types and ES valuations were then conducted, and multicriteria decision-making was applied for conservation. Our results reveal that trade-off intensities were lower within the social values compared to the biophysical values. Within both value dimensions, relatively stronger trade-offs were found between food production and other ESs. Areas with both high biophysical and social values were infrequently observed across ESs. Based on the characteristics of diverse values, our study identified priority conservation areas and provided management implications. We argue that adopting the integrated social–ecological perspective in sustainable environmental management contributes to the realization of harmonious coexistence between people and nature in peri-urban areas.