Stefania Nicolosi

Introduction: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a distinct malignancy of the head and neck with high prevalence in endemic regions and a strong association with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). In locally advanced stages, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by chemoradiotherapy improves outcomes, but response rates vary. Identifying early predictors of NAC response is essential for guiding personalized treatment strategies. This study aims to assess whether baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT parameters can predict NAC response in NPC patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, 27 patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced (stage III) NPC underwent baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT prior to NAC between 2015 and 2023. Quantitative PET parameters including SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were extracted from the primary tumor. NAC response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria and classified as responders (CR + PR) or non-responders (SD + PD). Group comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test. ROC analysis was used to identify optimal cut-off values. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The cohort included 20 males and 7 females (mean age: 60.8 ± 15.2 years). The predominant histotype was undifferentiated non-keratinizing carcinoma (92.6%). A total of 19 patients (70.4%) responded to NAC. Responders had significantly lower baseline SUVmax (10.9 ± 4.8 vs. 15.8 ± 4.1, p = 0.021), MTV (16.2 ± 12.4 vs. 27.8 ± 19.5 cm³, p = 0.045), and TLG (128.6 ± 98.2 vs. 218.7 ± 152.4, p = 0.038). SUVmean was also lower in responders (6.1 ± 2.1 vs. 9.3 ± 2.8), although not statistically reported. ROC analysis identified SUVmax > 12.5 and MTV > 20.0 cm³ as thresholds associated with poor NAC response. Conclusions: Baseline metabolic parameters from [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT, particularly SUVmax and MTV, may assist stratification of NAC response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These biomarkers may facilitate pre-treatment stratification and guide more personalized therapeutic approaches. However, the limited sample size may affect the generalizability of these findings, and larger prospective studies are needed to confirm the results.

Background: This meta-analysis compared the diagnostic performance of [¹⁸F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or PET versus Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting recurrence or residual tumors at the primary site in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases to find studies with at least 20 patients with NPC undergoing both [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (or [¹⁸F]FDG PET) and MRI for detecting recurrence or assessing residual disease at the primary site. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT and MRI were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared. Results: Five studies, including 1908 patients (six patient groups), were included. PET imaging had higher sensitivity [93.3% (95% CI: 91.3–94.9%); I² = 52.6%] compared to MRI [80.1% (95% CI: 77.2–82.8%); I² = 68.3%], but the specificity of the two modalities was similar: 93.8% (95% CI: 92.2–95.2%; I² = 0%) for PET/CT and 91.8% (95% CI: 90.1–93.4%; I² = 94.3%) for MRI. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for PET/CT and MRI were 0.978 and 0.924, respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.23). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging and MRI do not significantly differ in diagnostic performance. Nevertheless, [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging shows higher sensitivity than MRI.

CAR-T-cell therapy, also referred to as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is a novel method in the field of immunotherapy for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). In patients receiving CAR-T-cell therapy, fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography ([¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT) plays a critical role in tracking treatment response and evaluating the immunotherapy’s overall efficacy. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature on the studies aiming to assess and predict toxicity by means of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in patients with NHL receiving CAR-T-cell therapy. PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were interrogated by two investigators to seek studies involving the use of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in patients with lymphoma undergoing CAR-T-cell therapy. The comprehensive computer literature search allowed 11 studies to be included. The risk of bias for the studies included in the systematic review was scored as low by using version 2 of the “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies” tool (QUADAS-2). The current literature emphasizes the role of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in assessing and predicting toxicity in patients with NHL receiving CAR-T-cell therapy, highlighting the evolving nature of research in CAR-T-cell therapy. Additional studies are warranted to increase the collected evidence in the literature.