Licheng Lin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Licheng Lin has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Pujie Jing
North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Langfang 065000, China
2 shared publications - Bin Feng
Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Tianjin 300300, China
1 shared publication Senshan Pan
School of Computer Science and Telecommunication Engineering Jiangsu University Zhenjiang Jiangsu China
1 shared publicationXiangmei Song
School of Computer Science and Telecommunication Engineering Jiangsu University Zhenjiang Jiangsu China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
GeoCross: A Privacy-Preserving and Fine-Grained Authorization Scheme for Cross-Chain Geological Data Sharing
With the rapid development of geological blockchains and Internet of Things-based data acquisition technologies, massive amounts of heterogeneous data are constantly emerging. However, this data is stored in a distributed manner across different organizational or business blockchains. Data sharing among multiple geological blockchains faces numerous challenges, either exposing sensitive data during verification or lacking effective authorization mechanisms. Therefore, how to achieve fine-grained access control and privacy protection across multiple blockchains has become a critical issue that must be addressed in geological data sharing. In this paper, we propose GeoCross, a cross-chain geological data sharing framework that enables fine-grained authorization management and privacy protection. First, GeoCross provides a hierarchical hybrid encryption mechanism that uses symmetric encryption for geological data protection and ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption to enable flexible cross-chain access policies. Second, we integrate a Groth16-based zero-knowledge proof mechanism, which allows a chain to verify the existence, integrity, and accessibility of off-chain data without revealing the content. Furthermore, we introduce a Reputation-based Non-interactive Relay node Selection protocol (RNRS), which enhances the trustworthiness and fairness of cross-chain routing. Finally, we implement GeoCross in a multi-chain Hyperledger Fabric environment and evaluate its performance under real-world workloads. Results show that Groth16 verification requires only three bilinear pairings, achieving a throughput of up to 390 tps on a single chain and 1550 tps in a concurrent multi-chain environment. Even with 50% malicious nodes, the RNRS protocol still maintains a success rate of over 91%. These results demonstrate that GeoCross provides an efficient and practical solution for secure and privacy-preserving cross-chain geological data sharing.
Open AccessGeoCross: A Privacy-Preserving and Fine-Grained Authorization Scheme for Cross-Chain Geological Data Sharing
With the rapid development of geological blockchains and Internet of Things-based data acquisition technologies, massive amounts of heterogeneous data are constantly emerging. However, this data is stored in a distributed manner across different organizational or business blockchains. Data sharing among multiple geological blockchains faces numerous challenges, either exposing sensitive data during verification or lacking effective authorization mechanisms. Therefore, how to achieve fine-grained access control and privacy protection across multiple blockchains has become a critical issue that must be addressed in geological data sharing. In this paper, we propose GeoCross, a cross-chain geological data sharing framework that enables fine-grained authorization management and privacy protection. First, GeoCross provides a hierarchical hybrid encryption mechanism that uses symmetric encryption for geological data protection and ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption to enable flexible cross-chain access policies. Second, we integrate a Groth16-based zero-knowledge proof mechanism, which allows a chain to verify the existence, integrity, and accessibility of off-chain data without revealing the content. Furthermore, we introduce a Reputation-based Non-interactive Relay node Selection protocol (RNRS), which enhances the trustworthiness and fairness of cross-chain routing. Finally, we implement GeoCross in a multi-chain Hyperledger Fabric environment and evaluate its performance under real-world workloads. Results show that Groth16 verification requires only three bilinear pairings, achieving a throughput of up to 390 tps on a single chain and 1550 tps in a concurrent multi-chain environment. Even with 50% malicious nodes, the RNRS protocol still maintains a success rate of over 91%. These results demonstrate that GeoCross provides an efficient and practical solution for secure and privacy-preserving cross-chain geological data sharing.
- Open Access
- 26 May 2024
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IET Blockchain
- Vol. 4 (S1) , 570-585
Leveraging dual‐blockchain collaboration for logistics supply chain supervision
Logistics supply chain (LSC), a chain structure that integrates and coordinates all logistics transactions, has become an essential component of the modern logistics industry. By using blockchain, trusted logistics services enable participants to effectively record and track transactions during the logistics process. Current blockchain‐based LSC features distributed structure and data privacy requirements, hindering the supervision of logistics transactions. Leveraging emerging dual‐blockchain architecture to separate logistics transactions from supervision is a promising direction. However, the dual‐blockchain collaboration restricts supervision due to its cross‐chain privacy and efficiency. To address these issues, a logistics supply chain supervision scheme based on dual‐blockchain collaboration (DBC) is proposed. First, an independent supervision blockchain is constructed to balance the contradiction between distributed structure and supervision requirements. Second, two mechanisms are designed to enhance the privacy and performance of collaborative supervision. The hybrid access control mechanism enables fine‐grained supervision for different participants, and the aggregated transaction verification method supports efficient collaboration for logistics transactions. Security analysis and performance evaluation demonstrate the feasibility of DBC in enhancing the security and supervision of logistics data on the dual‐blockchain architecture. Experimental results show that the cross‐chain supervision overhead of DBC is reduced to of the baseline schemes.
- 26 May 2024
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IET Blockchain
- Vol. 4 (S1) , 570-585
Open AccessLeveraging dual‐blockchain collaboration for logistics supply chain supervision
Logistics supply chain (LSC), a chain structure that integrates and coordinates all logistics transactions, has become an essential component of the modern logistics industry. By using blockchain, trusted logistics services enable participants to effectively record and track transactions during the logistics process. Current blockchain‐based LSC features distributed structure and data privacy requirements, hindering the supervision of logistics transactions. Leveraging emerging dual‐blockchain architecture to separate logistics transactions from supervision is a promising direction. However, the dual‐blockchain collaboration restricts supervision due to its cross‐chain privacy and efficiency. To address these issues, a logistics supply chain supervision scheme based on dual‐blockchain collaboration (DBC) is proposed. First, an independent supervision blockchain is constructed to balance the contradiction between distributed structure and supervision requirements. Second, two mechanisms are designed to enhance the privacy and performance of collaborative supervision. The hybrid access control mechanism enables fine‐grained supervision for different participants, and the aggregated transaction verification method supports efficient collaboration for logistics transactions. Security analysis and performance evaluation demonstrate the feasibility of DBC in enhancing the security and supervision of logistics data on the dual‐blockchain architecture. Experimental results show that the cross‐chain supervision overhead of DBC is reduced to of the baseline schemes.