Qi Xie
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Qi Xie has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Guan-Yin Jiang
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei
1 shared publicationHui-Bin Liu
Department of Surgery, Rugao Motou Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu
1 shared publicationJia-Xu Weng
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei
1 shared publicationLing-Bing Meng
Neurology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, P. R. China
1 shared publicationMeng-Jie Shan
Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
1 shared publicationPeng Guo
Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 98 (21) , e15810
Systematic estimation of BMI
The prevalence of overweight–obesity has increased sharply among undergraduates worldwide. In 2016, approximately 52% of adults were overweight–obese. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the prevalence of overweight–obesity and explore in depth the connection between eating habits and overweight–obesity among Chinese undergraduates. The study population included 536 undergraduates recruited in Shijiazhuang, China, in 2017. They were administered questionnaires for assessing demographic and daily lifestyle characteristics, including sex, region, eating speed, number of meals per day, and sweetmeat habit. Anthropometric status was assessed by calculating the body mass index (BMI). The determinants of overweight–obesity were investigated by the Pearson χ2 test, Spearman rho test, multivariable linear regression, univariate/multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The prevalence of undergraduate overweight–obesity was 13.6%. Sex [male vs female, odds ratio (OR): 1.903; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.147–3.156], region (urban vs rural, OR: 1.953; 95% CI: 1.178–3.240), number of meals per day (3 vs 2, OR: 0.290; 95% CI: 0.137–0.612), and sweetmeat habit (every day vs never, OR: 4.167; 95% CI: 1.090–15.933) were significantly associated with overweight–obesity. Eating very fast was positively associated with overweight–obesity and showed the highest OR (vs very slow/slow, OR: 5.486; 95% CI: 1.622–18.553). However, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that only higher eating speed is a significant independent risk factor for overweight/obesity (OR: 17.392; 95% CI, 1.614–187.363; P = .019). Scoremeng = 1.402 × scoresex + 1.269 × scoreregion + 19.004 × scoreeatin speed + 2.546 × scorenumber of meals per day + 1.626 × scoresweetmeat habit and BMI = 0.253 × Scoremeng + 18.592. These 2 formulas can help estimate the weight status of undergraduates and predict whether they will be overweight or obese.
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 98 (21) , e15810
Open AccessSystematic estimation of BMI
The prevalence of overweight–obesity has increased sharply among undergraduates worldwide. In 2016, approximately 52% of adults were overweight–obese. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the prevalence of overweight–obesity and explore in depth the connection between eating habits and overweight–obesity among Chinese undergraduates. The study population included 536 undergraduates recruited in Shijiazhuang, China, in 2017. They were administered questionnaires for assessing demographic and daily lifestyle characteristics, including sex, region, eating speed, number of meals per day, and sweetmeat habit. Anthropometric status was assessed by calculating the body mass index (BMI). The determinants of overweight–obesity were investigated by the Pearson χ2 test, Spearman rho test, multivariable linear regression, univariate/multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The prevalence of undergraduate overweight–obesity was 13.6%. Sex [male vs female, odds ratio (OR): 1.903; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.147–3.156], region (urban vs rural, OR: 1.953; 95% CI: 1.178–3.240), number of meals per day (3 vs 2, OR: 0.290; 95% CI: 0.137–0.612), and sweetmeat habit (every day vs never, OR: 4.167; 95% CI: 1.090–15.933) were significantly associated with overweight–obesity. Eating very fast was positively associated with overweight–obesity and showed the highest OR (vs very slow/slow, OR: 5.486; 95% CI: 1.622–18.553). However, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that only higher eating speed is a significant independent risk factor for overweight/obesity (OR: 17.392; 95% CI, 1.614–187.363; P = .019). Scoremeng = 1.402 × scoresex + 1.269 × scoreregion + 19.004 × scoreeatin speed + 2.546 × scorenumber of meals per day + 1.626 × scoresweetmeat habit and BMI = 0.253 × Scoremeng + 18.592. These 2 formulas can help estimate the weight status of undergraduates and predict whether they will be overweight or obese.