Gabriel Steinberg

Reliable and scalable landmine detection technologies are essential for humanitarian mine action (HMA), yet standardized benchmarks for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based sensing in operationally relevant environments remain limited. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of 34 multimodal datasets acquired over a standardized seeded test site for landmine and unexploded ordnance detection. Nine sensing modalities, including RGB, thermal, multispectral, hyperspectral, LiDAR, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), are evaluated using the Anomaly, Identifiable Anomaly, Unique Identifiable Anomaly (AIU) index to establish a unified framework for quantifying detection fidelity. Results indicate that RGB imagery achieves the highest surface detection rate (94.8%), with 45.4% of targets classified as uniquely identifiable, reducing false-positive risk. For sub-surface detection, handheld electromagnetic induction (EMI) and magnetometry exceed 95% detection for ferrous items but fall below 10% for plastic ordnance. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is the only modality capable of detecting buried plastic targets (55.6% for cart-based systems), whereas UAV-mounted GPR remains limited (18.2%) at current operational flight heights. Based on the comparative analysis, we discuss the gaps in current detection capabilities, compare false-positive rates across modalities, and perform a cost–benefit analysis fitting contamination scenarios with the most cost-effective detection method. All datasets are publicly released, along with an interactive web-map, to support reproducible benchmarking and cross-modality comparison in UAV-enabled explosive hazard detection.

Reliable and scalable landmine detection technologies are essential for humanitarian mine action (HMA), yet standardized benchmarks for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based sensing in operationally relevant environments remain limited. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of 34 multimodal datasets acquired over a standardized seeded test site for landmine and unexploded ordnance detection. Nine sensing modalities, including RGB, thermal, multispectral, hyperspectral, LiDAR, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), are evaluated using the Anomaly, Identifiable Anomaly, Unique Identifiable Anomaly (AIU) index to establish a unified framework for quantifying detection fidelity. Results indicate that RGB imagery achieves the highest surface detection rate (94.8%), with 45.4% of targets classified as uniquely identifiable, reducing false-positive risk. For sub-surface detection, handheld electromagnetic induction (EMI) and magnetometry exceed 95% detection for ferrous items but fall below 10% for plastic ordnance. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is the only modality capable of detecting buried plastic targets (55.6% for cart-based systems), whereas UAV-mounted GPR remains limited (18.2%) at current operational flight heights. Based on the comparative analysis, we discuss the gaps in current detection capabilities, compare false positive rates across modalities, and perform a cost-benefit analysis fitting contamination scenario with the most cost effective detection method. All datasets are publicly released (https://zenodo.org/records/19100554) along with an interactive web-map (https://staging.dmsamfvv1bhon.amplifyapp.com/) to support reproducible benchmarking and cross-modality comparison in UAV-enabled explosive hazard detection.

An important consideration for UAV-based (unmanned aerial vehicle) object detection in the natural environment is vegetation height and foliar cover, which can visually obscure the items a machine learning model is trained to detect. Hence, the accuracy of aerial detection of objects such as surface landmines and UXO (unexploded ordnance) is highly dependent on the height and density of vegetation in a given area. In this study, we develop a model that estimates the detection accuracy (recall) of a YOLOv8 object’s detection implementation as a function of occlusion due to vegetation coverage. To solve this function, we developed an algorithm to extract vegetation height and coverage of the UAV imagery from a digital surface model generated using structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry. We find the relationship between recall and percent occlusion is well modeled by a sigmoid function using the PFM-1 landmine test case. Applying the sigmoid recall-occlusion relationship in conjunction with our vegetation cover algorithm to solve for percent occlusion, we mapped the uncertainty in detection rate due to vegetation in UAV-based SfM orthomosaics in eight different minefield environments. This methodology and model have significant implications for determining the optimal location and time of year for UAV-based object detection tasks and quantifying the uncertainty of deep learning object detection models in the natural environment.