Romana Mazalová
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Interests
Romana Mazalová has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Helena Pospíšilová
Department of Christian Social Work, Palacký University Olomouc
2 shared publications - Ludmila Trochtová
Department of Christian Social Work, Palacký University Olomouc
2 shared publications - Alice Kosarkova
Department of Christian Education, Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology, Palacky University in Olomouc
1 shared publication - Antonín Hlavinka
Center for Digital Health, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic
1 shared publication - Glenda Fleming
Dublin City University
1 shared publication - Ladislav Stanke
The Czech National E-health Center, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc 779 00, Czech Republic
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 August 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Gerontology
- p. 1-19
Share, verify, or ignore? Analysis of older adults’ responses to misinformation and disinformation
- 17 August 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Gerontology
- p. 1-19
Open AccessShare, verify, or ignore? Analysis of older adults’ responses to misinformation and disinformation
- Open Access
- 26 August 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cogent Education
- Vol. 12 (1)
Recognizing and managing disinformation and misinformation: qualitative insights into strategies of Third Age university participants
- 26 August 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cogent Education
- Vol. 12 (1)
Open AccessRecognizing and managing disinformation and misinformation: qualitative insights into strategies of Third Age university participants
- Open Access
- 9 June 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Behavioral Sciences
- Vol. 14 (6) , 489
Patients’ UX Impact on Medication Adherence in Czech Pilot Study for Chronically Ill
This article presents a comprehensive and multistage approach to the development of the user experience (UX) for an mHealth application targeting older adult patients with chronic diseases, specifically chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The study adopts a mixed methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative components. The underlying hypothesis posits that baseline medicine adherence knowledge (measured by the MARS questionnaire), beliefs about medicines (measured by the BMQ questionnaire), and level of user experience (measured by the SUS and UEQ questionnaires) act as predictors of adherence change after a period of usage of the mHealth application. However, contrary to our expectations, the results did not demonstrate the anticipated relationship between the variables examined. Nevertheless, the qualitative component of the research revealed that patients, in general, expressed satisfaction with the application. It is important to note that the pilot testing phase revealed a notable prevalence of technical issues, which may have influenced participants’ perception of the overall UX. These findings contribute to the understanding of UX development in the context of mHealth applications for older adults with chronic diseases and emphasise the importance of addressing technical challenges to enhance user satisfaction and engagement.
- 9 June 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Behavioral Sciences
- Vol. 14 (6) , 489
Open AccessPatients’ UX Impact on Medication Adherence in Czech Pilot Study for Chronically Ill
This article presents a comprehensive and multistage approach to the development of the user experience (UX) for an mHealth application targeting older adult patients with chronic diseases, specifically chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The study adopts a mixed methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative components. The underlying hypothesis posits that baseline medicine adherence knowledge (measured by the MARS questionnaire), beliefs about medicines (measured by the BMQ questionnaire), and level of user experience (measured by the SUS and UEQ questionnaires) act as predictors of adherence change after a period of usage of the mHealth application. However, contrary to our expectations, the results did not demonstrate the anticipated relationship between the variables examined. Nevertheless, the qualitative component of the research revealed that patients, in general, expressed satisfaction with the application. It is important to note that the pilot testing phase revealed a notable prevalence of technical issues, which may have influenced participants’ perception of the overall UX. These findings contribute to the understanding of UX development in the context of mHealth applications for older adults with chronic diseases and emphasise the importance of addressing technical challenges to enhance user satisfaction and engagement.