Margaret M. Redfield

BACKGROUND: Technetium-based cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging enables noninvasive diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), but conventional planar and visual semiquantitative approaches have important limitations. We developed the quantitative 3-dimensional Mayo 3D Score, defined as the ratio of mean left ventricular myocardial radiotracer uptake to right atrial blood-pool uptake using computed tomography (CT)-fused single-photon emission CT (SPECT) volumes of interest, and sought to validate its diagnostic performance against myocardial pathology. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent ^99m Tc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT at Mayo Clinic for suspected ATTR-CM between June 2017 and January 2025 with archived myocardial tissue were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, echocardiogram, biomarkers, visual semiquantitative, and Mayo 3D Score metrics, were collected. Myocardial specimens underwent histopathologic confirmation of amyloid, with amyloid subtype determination and further semiquantitative grading of amyloid burden and deposition patterns. RESULTS: Among 230 patients (median age, 72 years; 78% male), 107 (47%) had ATTR-CM, of whom 9 had hereditary ATTR-CM. The Mayo 3D Score showed excellent discrimination against pathology (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.92 [0.88–0.96]), exceeding planar Perugini (0.87 [0.83–0.92]; P =0.006), and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (0.86 [0.81–0.91]; P =0.004) and comparable to SPECT Perugini (0.90 [0.86–0.94]; P =0.12). A cutoff ≥1.0 yielded 86.0% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, 91.1% positive predictive value, and 88.4% negative predictive value. Among ATTR-positive cases, the Mayo 3D Score correlated strongly with semiquantitative amyloid burden (Spearman ρ=0.69), was higher in pericellular than nodular deposition patterns ( P P =0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected ATTR-CM undergoing ^99m Tc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT, the Mayo 3D Score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with planar metrics and comparable to SPECT Perugini, while correlating with myocardial ATTR burden and deposition patterns on pathology. These findings support its integration as a quantitative adjunct within clinical diagnostic ATTR-CM workflows.

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often complain of dyspnea, raising the question that symptoms could be related to unrecognized heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We used the HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF algorithm to estimate the probability of undiagnosed HFpEF in CABANA (Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy), and its interaction with catheter ablation on quality of life (QOL). Probable HFpEF was defined as patient‐reported dyspnea with HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability≥75%. Absence of dyspnea or HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probabilityP P =0.01). Ablation resulted in greater improvement in EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity/frequency scores in probable HFpEF (interactions P =0.005, P =0.05, and P =0.04 respectively). In probable HFpEF, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66–0.92], P =0.003, interaction P =0.03) but not HF hospitalization (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.55–1.64], P =0.84). Conclusions: Nearly three quarters of CABANA participants had potentially undiagnosed HFpEF, with worse QOL and risk of HF hospitalization. Catheter ablation in probable HFpEF resulted in greater improvement in QOL, but residual QOL impairment and HF risk remained elevated despite ablation. These data reinforce the importance of diligent consideration of HFpEF among patients with symptomatic AF to ensure optimal use of foundational treatments for HF.

Background: Valvular heart disease contributes to symptomatic heart failure, but its prevalence and prognostic significance in advanced heart failure is not well understood. Methods: This retrospective population‐based cohort study included adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with advanced heart failure (2007–2018). Patients were classified by echocardiographic regurgitation and stenosis of aortic, mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonic valves at the time of advanced heart failure. We examined the associations of aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation with risks of cardiovascular and all‐cause death through 2023 using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 936 patients with advanced heart failure (mean age, 76.9 years; 44.5% women, 43.4% with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction). Moderate or greater regurgitation was observed in 2.8% (n=26) of aortic, 26% (n=244) of mitral, 42% (n=389) of tricuspid, and 4.3% (n=40) of pulmonic valves, while moderate or greater stenosis was observed in 9.7% (n=91) of aortic and 1.8% (n=17) of mitral valves. No patients had clinically significant tricuspid or pulmonic stenosis. After adjustment for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular function, serum sodium, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure, moderate and severe aortic stenosis were associated with increased cardiovascular death compared with patients without aortic stenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.01–2.01]; and HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.02–2.36]), respectively. Conclusions: Tricuspid regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, and aortic stenosis were the most observed valvular pathologies of moderate or greater severity in advanced heart failure. Only moderate or greater aortic stenosis was independently associated with cardiovascular death in advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Plasma NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) is commonly used to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its diagnostic performance in the ambulatory/outpatient setting is unknown because previous studies lacked objective reference standards. METHODS: Among patients with chronic dyspnea, diagnosis of HFpEF or noncardiac dyspnea was determined conclusively by exercise catheterization in a derivation cohort (n=414), multicenter validation cohort 1 (n=560), validation cohort 2 (n=207), and a nonobese Japanese validation cohort 3 (n=77). Optimal NT-proBNP cut points for HFpEF rule out (optimizing sensitivity) and rule in (optimizing specificity) were derived and tested, stratified by obesity and atrial fibrillation. Derived cut points were tested in 3 additional validation cohorts (cohorts 4–6) in whom HFpEF was diagnosed by resting catheterization only (n=260), previous hospitalization for heart failure (n=447), or exercise echocardiography (n=517), respectively. RESULTS: Current recommended rule-out NT-proBNP threshold 2 , decreasing to 67% (95% CI, 58%–77%) with a BMI ≥35 kg/m ² . A lower rule-out NT-proBNP threshold 2 (97% [95% CI, 95%–99%]), with a modest decline in sensitivity with a BMI ≥35 kg/m ² (86% [95% CI, 79%–93%]); diagnostic thresholds were confirmed in validation cohorts 1 and 2 (91% [95% CI, 88%–95%] and 86% [95% CI, 80%–93%] with a BMI 2 ; 80% [95% CI, 74%–87%] and 84% [95% CI, 74%–93%] with a BMI ≥35 kg/m ² ). Current consensus age- and BMI-stratified rule-in thresholds demonstrated only 65% specificity (95% CI, 57%–72%). Rule-in NT-proBNP threshold ≥500 pg/mL had 85% specificity (95% CI, 78%–91%) with a BMI 2 (87% [95% CI, 80%–94%] and 90% [95% CI, 81%–99%] in validation cohorts), with 100% specificity at a BMI ≥35 kg/m ² (93% [95% CI, 81%–100%] and 100% in validation cohorts). With a BMI ≥35 kg/m ² , lower rule-in thresholds (≥220 pg/mL) provided good specificity (88% [95% CI, 73%–100%]; 93% [95% CI, 81%–100%] and 100% in validation cohorts). Findings were consistent in validation cohorts 3 through 6 (sensitivity of <50 pg/mL, 93%–98%; specificity of ≥500 pg/mL, 82%–89%). NT-proBNP provided no incremental discrimination among patients with history of AF; ≥98% of patients with AF and dyspnea were found to have HFpEF in our cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic unexplained dyspnea, current rule-in and rule-out NT-proBNP diagnostic thresholds lead to unacceptably high error rates, with important interactions by obesity and AF status. In our study, NT-proBNP provided little value in those with AF and dyspnea because the presence of AF is by itself a robust biomarker of HFpEF. Use of separate rule-in and rule-out diagnostic thresholds stratified by BMI reduces miscategorization and can guide more appropriate use of exercise testing for possible HFpEF.

Background: This study aims to characterize right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction and understand the cumulative prognostic value of abnormal RV echocardiographic parameters in HF with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results: Data from 809 patients in the PARAGON‐HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin‐Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction) echocardiographic substudy (55% women, mean age 74±8 years) were analyzed. Correlates of RVD (defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <1.7 cm, fractional area change <35% or absolute RV free wall longitudinal strain <20%) were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. We further assessed the prognostic value of the number of abnormal RV parameters (0, 1, ≥2) on total HF hospitalizations (HFH) and cardiovascular death, total HFH, first HFH or cardiovascular death, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death. RVD was identified in 461 (57%) patients. Correlates of RVD included older age, higher heart rate, atrial fibrillation/flutter, greater left ventricle wall thickness, higher N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide levels, lower systolic blood pressure, and lower left ventricle absolute global longitudinal strain. These results were consistent across sexes, except atrial fibrillation/flutter and LV wall thickness, which were associated with a higher risk of RVD in men but not in women. Participants with ≥2 abnormal RV parameters had a significantly higher adjusted risk of total HFH and cardiovascular death (rate ratio, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.13–4.01]), first HFH or cardiovascular death, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death. Conversely, an isolated abnormal RV parameter was not associated with a worse outcome. Conclusions: RV measures may underestimate the burden of RVD in HF with preserved ejection fraction when considered in isolation. Clinicians should consider multiple dimensions to comprehensively assess RV function in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.

Objective Patients with heart failure (HF) perform a variety of self-care activities to control symptoms and minimise the risk of HF decompensations. The objective of this study was to understand how patients build capacity and manage the work of living with HF. Design A qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews. The interview guide was informed by the Cumulative Complexity Model, a conceptual framework that focuses on a patient’s workload and their capacity to manage that work. Interview transcripts were analysed using a mixed inductive and deductive coding approach with organisation into larger thematic categories. Setting Southeastern Minnesota USA (11 counties) with capture of data from local community healthcare providers under the auspices of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Participants Intentional sampling of local patients with HF (n=24, median age 69.5 years, 54% women, 63% rural, 54% preserved ejection fraction) who reported high treatment burden and/ or poor health status on a questionnaire. Results Three major themes emerged: using capacity to manage workload, disruptions resulting in workload exceeding capacity and regaining workload-capacity balance. Participants described routinising the daily tasks associated with living with HF to minimise the associated burden and identified disruptions to their routines, including hospitalisations, emergency room visits, worsening health status and changes in healthcare access. To accommodate disruptions and regain workload-capacity balance, participants decreased workload and/or transferred tasks to others to maximise capacity. Conclusions Participants with HF described managing patient workload in times of stable health, but they sometimes struggled to accommodate disruptions and worsening health status. These findings can inform the design of interventions to minimise workload, maximise capacity and improve quality of life for patients with HF.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is common in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction but its clinical correlates and prognostic associations are poorly understood. METHODS: We analyzed cognitive function, using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction enrolled in a prespecified substudy of the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the variables associated with lower MMSE scores at baseline and postbaseline decline in MMSE scores at 48 weeks. Cox proportional hazards regression and semiparametric proportional rates models were used to examine the risk of clinical outcomes related to baseline MMSE scores, and decline in MMSE scores during follow-up, adjusted for prognostic variables including NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: At baseline, cognitive function was normal (MMSE score 28–30) in 1809 of 2895 patients (62.5%), borderline (score 24–27) in 794 (27.4%), and impaired (score <24) in 292 (10.1%). Variables associated with both a lower MMSE score at baseline and a decline in score from baseline included older age, a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and lower serum albumin. Compared with those with baseline MMSE scores of 28 to 30, patients in the lower MMSE score categories had a stepwise increase in the risk of the composite of time to first heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.06–1.53) for those with scores of 24 to 27 and 1.58 (95% CI, 1.21–2.06) for those with scores <24, respectively. These associations were also found for the individual components of the composite and all-cause death. Likewise, cognitive impairment was associated with a 50% higher risk of total (first and repeat) heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths. Examining the change in MMSE score from baseline, a decrease in MMSE score during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction, even modest baseline impairment of cognitive function was associated with worse outcomes, including death. A decline in MMSE score during follow-up was a strong predictor of mortality, independent of other prognostic variables.

Aims: In the absence of randomized trial evidence, we performed a large observational analysis of the association between beta-blocker (BB) use and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results: We pooled individual patient data from four large HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (I-Preserve, TOPCAT, PARAGON-HF, and DELIVER). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Among the 16 951 patients included, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8%, and 13 400 (79.1%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). Overall, 12 812 patients (75.6%) received a BB. The median bisoprolol-equivalent dose of BB was 5.0 (Q1–Q3: 2.5–5.0) mg with BB continuation rates of 93.1% at 2 years (in survivors). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome did not differ between BB users and non-users (HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.05), but the adjusted HR was lower in BB users than non-users (0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88), and this association was maintained across LVEF (pinteraction = 0.88). In subgroup analyses, the adjusted risk of the primary outcome was similar in BB users and non-users with or without a history of myocardial infarction, hypertension, or a baseline heart rate <70 bpm. By contrast, a better outcome with BB use was seen in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation (pintreraction = 0.02). Conclusions: In this observational analysis of non-randomized BB treatment, there was no suggestion that BB use was associated with worse HF outcomes in HFmrEF/HFpEF, even after extensive adjustment for other prognostic variables.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major, worldwide health-care problem. Few therapies for HFpEF exist because the pathophysiology of this condition is poorly defined and, increasingly, postulated to be diverse. Although perturbations in other organs contribute to the clinical profile in HFpEF, altered cardiac structure, function or both are the primary causes of this heart failure syndrome. Therefore, studying myocardial tissue is fundamental to improve pathophysiological insights and therapeutic discovery in HFpEF. Most studies of myocardial changes in HFpEF have relied on cardiac tissue from animal models without (or with limited) confirmatory studies in human cardiac tissue. Animal models of HFpEF have evolved based on theoretical HFpEF aetiologies, but these models might not reflect the complex pathophysiology of human HFpEF. The focus of this Review is the pathophysiological insights gained from studies of human HFpEF myocardium. We outline the rationale for these studies, the challenges and opportunities in obtaining myocardial tissue from patients with HFpEF and relevant comparator groups, the analytical approaches, the pathophysiological insights gained to date and the remaining knowledge gaps. Our objective is to provide a roadmap for future studies of cardiac tissue from diverse cohorts of patients with HFpEF, coupling discovery biology with measures to account for pathophysiological diversity.