Jenny Diomidova

Given a periodic placement of copies of a tromino (either L or I), we prove co-RE-completeness (and hence undecidability) of deciding whether it can be completed to a plane tiling. By contrast, the problem becomes decidable if the initial placement is finite, or if the tile is a domino instead of a tromino (in any dimension). As a consequence, tiling a given periodic subset of the plane with a given tromino (L or I) is co-RE-complete. We also prove co-RE-completeness of tiling the entire plane with two polyominoes (one of which is disconnected and the other of which has constant size), and of tiling 3D space with two connected polycubes (one of which has constant size). If we restrict to tiling by translation only (no rotation), then we obtain co-RE-completeness with one more tile: two trominoes for a periodic subset of 2D, three polyominoes for the 2D plane, and three connected polycubes for 3D space. Along the way, we prove several new complexity and algorithmic results about periodic (infinite) graphs. Notably, we prove that Periodic Planar (1-in-)3SAT-3, 3DM, and Graph Orientation are co-RE-complete in 2D and PSPACE-complete in 1D; we extend basic results in graph drawing to 2D periodic graphs; and we give a polynomial-time algorithm for perfect matching in bipartite periodic graphs.

We extend the motion-planning-through-gadgets framework to several new scenarios involving various numbers of robots/agents, and analyze the complexity of the resulting motion-planning problems. While past work considers just one robot or one robot per player, most of our models allow for one or more locations to spawn new robots in each time step, leading to arbitrarily many robots. In the 0-player context, where all motion is deterministically forced, we prove that deciding whether any robot ever reaches a specified location is undecidable, by representing a counter machine. In the 1-player context, where the player can choose how to move the robots, we prove equivalence to Petri nets, EXPSPACE-completeness for reaching a specified location, PSPACE-completeness for reconfiguration, and ACKERMANN-completeness for reconfiguration when robots can be destroyed in addition to spawned. Finally, we consider a variation on the standard 2-player context where, instead of one robot per player, we have one robot shared by the players, along with a ko rule to prevent immediately undoing the previous move. We prove this impartial 2-player game EXPTIME-complete.

We analyze the puzzle video game This Game Is Not Going To Load Itself, where the player routes data packets of three different colors from given sources to given sinks of the correct color. Given the sources, sinks, and some previously placed arrow tiles, we prove that the game is in Sigma_2^P; in NP for sources of equal period; NP-complete for three colors and six equal-period sources with player input; and even without player input, simulating the game is both NP- and coNP-hard for two colors and many sources with different periods. On the other hand, we characterize which locations for three data sinks admit a perfect placement of arrow tiles that guarantee correct routing no matter the placement of the data sources, effectively solving most instances of the game as it is normally played.

We prove that Strings-and-Coins -- the combinatorial two-player game generalizing the dual of Dots-and-Boxes -- is strongly PSPACE-complete on multigraphs. This result improves the best previous result, NP-hardness, argued in Winning Ways. Our result also applies to the Nimstring variant, where the winner is determined by normal play; indeed, one step in our reduction is the standard reduction (also from Winning Ways) from Nimstring to Strings-and-Coins.