Avery Laird
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Avery Laird has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bangtian Liu
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
1 shared publication - Cong Yan
Microsoft Research, Redmond, USA
1 shared publication - Jubi Taneja
Microsoft Research, Redmond, USA
1 shared publication - Madanlal Musuvathi
Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
1 shared publication - Maryam Mehri Dehnavi
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada and NVIDIA, Seattle, USA
1 shared publication - Nikolaj Bjørner
Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 March 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 137-149
LLM-Vectorizer: LLM-Based Verified Loop Vectorizer
Vectorization is a powerful optimization technique that significantly boosts the performance of high performance computing applications operating on large data arrays. Despite decades of research on auto-vectorization, compilers frequently miss opportunities to vectorize code. On the other hand, writing vectorized code manually using compiler intrinsics is still a complex, error-prone task that demands deep knowledge of specific architecture and compilers. In this paper, we evaluate the potential of large-language models (LLMs) to generate vectorized (Single Instruction Multiple Data) code from scalar programs that process individual array elements. We propose a novel finite-state-machine multi-agents based approach that harnesses LLMs and test-based feedback to generate vectorized code. Our findings indicate that LLMs are capable of producing high-performance vectorized code with run-time speedup ranging from 1.1x to 9.4x as compared to the state-of-the-art compilers such as Intel Compiler, GCC, and Clang. To verify the correctness of vectorized code, we use Alive2, a leading bounded translation validation tool for LLVM IR. We describe a few domain-specific techniques to improve the scalability of Alive2 on our benchmark dataset. Overall, our approach is able to verify 38.2% of vectorizations as correct on the TSVC benchmark dataset.
- 1 March 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 137-149
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessLLM-Vectorizer: LLM-Based Verified Loop Vectorizer
Vectorization is a powerful optimization technique that significantly boosts the performance of high performance computing applications operating on large data arrays. Despite decades of research on auto-vectorization, compilers frequently miss opportunities to vectorize code. On the other hand, writing vectorized code manually using compiler intrinsics is still a complex, error-prone task that demands deep knowledge of specific architecture and compilers. In this paper, we evaluate the potential of large-language models (LLMs) to generate vectorized (Single Instruction Multiple Data) code from scalar programs that process individual array elements. We propose a novel finite-state-machine multi-agents based approach that harnesses LLMs and test-based feedback to generate vectorized code. Our findings indicate that LLMs are capable of producing high-performance vectorized code with run-time speedup ranging from 1.1x to 9.4x as compared to the state-of-the-art compilers such as Intel Compiler, GCC, and Clang. To verify the correctness of vectorized code, we use Alive2, a leading bounded translation validation tool for LLVM IR. We describe a few domain-specific techniques to improve the scalability of Alive2 on our benchmark dataset. Overall, our approach is able to verify 38.2% of vectorizations as correct on the TSVC benchmark dataset.
- Open Access
- 20 June 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
- Vol. 8 (PLDI) , 1680-1703
SpEQ: Translation of Sparse Codes using Equivalences
We present S p EQ, a quick and correct strategy for detecting semantics in sparse codes and enabling automatic translation to high-performance library calls or domain-specific languages (DSLs). When sparse linear algebra codes contain implicit preconditions about how data is stored that hamper direct translation, S p EQ identifies the high-level computation along with storage details and related preconditions. A run-time check guards the translation and ensures that required preconditions are met. We implement S p EQ using the LLVM framework, the Z3 solver, and egglog library and correctly translate sparse linear algebra codes into two high-performance libraries, NVIDIA cuSPARSE and Intel MKL, and OpenMP (OMP). We evaluate S p EQ on ten diverse benchmarks against two state-of-the-art translation tools. S p EQ achieves geometric mean speedups of 3.25 × , 5.09 × , and 8.04 × on OpenMP, MKL, and cuSPARSE backends, respectively. S p EQ is the only tool that can guarantee the correct translation of sparse computations.
- 20 June 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
- Vol. 8 (PLDI) , 1680-1703
Open AccessSpEQ: Translation of Sparse Codes using Equivalences
We present S p EQ, a quick and correct strategy for detecting semantics in sparse codes and enabling automatic translation to high-performance library calls or domain-specific languages (DSLs). When sparse linear algebra codes contain implicit preconditions about how data is stored that hamper direct translation, S p EQ identifies the high-level computation along with storage details and related preconditions. A run-time check guards the translation and ensures that required preconditions are met. We implement S p EQ using the LLVM framework, the Z3 solver, and egglog library and correctly translate sparse linear algebra codes into two high-performance libraries, NVIDIA cuSPARSE and Intel MKL, and OpenMP (OMP). We evaluate S p EQ on ten diverse benchmarks against two state-of-the-art translation tools. S p EQ achieves geometric mean speedups of 3.25 × , 5.09 × , and 8.04 × on OpenMP, MKL, and cuSPARSE backends, respectively. S p EQ is the only tool that can guarantee the correct translation of sparse computations.