Andrés Gaspar Castillo Sanz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Andrés Gaspar Castillo Sanz has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Almudena Castaño Reguillo
Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biosanitarias en Atención Primaria (FIIBAP), Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Ana Isabel Villimar Rodríguez1 shared publication
- Beatriz Benito-Sánchez
Foundation for Biosanitary Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Carsten Maple
University of Warwick
1 shared publication - Christos Androutsos
University of Ioannina
1 shared publication - Dietmar Frey
Charité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 August 2026
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Preprints
Adjusted Morbidity Groups Complexity Profiles Among High-Risk Chronic Patients in Primary Care: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using Real-World Data (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Population-based risk stratification using routinely collected health data can help identify individuals with greater health and care needs. However, high-risk chronic patients constitute a heterogeneous population, and further characterization of their complexity may support more targeted population health management. OBJECTIVE To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, functional, pharmacological, and primary health care (PHC) utilization profiles of high-risk chronic patients across quartiles of Adjusted Morbidity Group (AMG) complexity and identify factors independently associated with the highest complexity quartile. METHODS This population-based cross-sectional study used routinely collected real-world data from PHC electronic health records and pharmacy dispensing databases of the Madrid Health Service. Adults aged ≥18 years with chronic conditions classified as high-risk according to the AMG stratification tool as of April 30, 2021, were included. Patients were categorized into AMG complexity quartiles, with Q4 representing the highest complexity level. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional, pharmacological, and health care utilization characteristics were compared across complexity levels using descriptive and bivariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with Q4 complexity. RESULTS A total of 163,188 high-risk chronic patients were included. Compared with patients in the lower complexity quartile, those in Q4 were older (mean age 78.9 vs 75.6 years), had greater functional dependency (31.1% vs 14.2%), immobilization (18.9% vs 8.1%), and caregiver requirements (5.4% vs 2.4%), and had a higher morbidity burden (mean number of conditions 8.93 vs 6.31), medication use (10.0 vs 8.2 medications), and prevalence of polypharmacy (64.3% vs 47.7%). They also had more PHC contacts (29.6 vs 20.8 visits/year). In multivariable analysis, older age (OR 1.024 per year), heart failure (OR 2.874), neoplasm (OR 2.715), chronic kidney disease (OR 2.088), dementia (OR 1.987), caregiver presence (OR 1.393), polypharmacy (OR 1.161), and ≥20 PHC visits/year (OR 1.887) were positively associated with Q4 complexity, whereas female sex (OR 0.846) and greater functional independence (OR 0.669) were associated with lower odds of Q4 complexity (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS High-risk chronic patients in the highest AMG complexity quartile showed greater multimorbidity, functional impairment, medication burden, and PHC utilization. AMG complexity quartiles add value beyond high-risk status by identifying complex chronic patients with greater care needs and supporting targeted proactive care in PHC settings. These findings highlight the potential of routinely collected electronic health record and pharmacy data, combined with population-based risk stratification systems, as scalable tools for population health analysis and targeted health care planning in primary care.
- 15 August 2026
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Preprints
Open AccessAdjusted Morbidity Groups Complexity Profiles Among High-Risk Chronic Patients in Primary Care: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using Real-World Data (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Population-based risk stratification using routinely collected health data can help identify individuals with greater health and care needs. However, high-risk chronic patients constitute a heterogeneous population, and further characterization of their complexity may support more targeted population health management. OBJECTIVE To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, functional, pharmacological, and primary health care (PHC) utilization profiles of high-risk chronic patients across quartiles of Adjusted Morbidity Group (AMG) complexity and identify factors independently associated with the highest complexity quartile. METHODS This population-based cross-sectional study used routinely collected real-world data from PHC electronic health records and pharmacy dispensing databases of the Madrid Health Service. Adults aged ≥18 years with chronic conditions classified as high-risk according to the AMG stratification tool as of April 30, 2021, were included. Patients were categorized into AMG complexity quartiles, with Q4 representing the highest complexity level. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional, pharmacological, and health care utilization characteristics were compared across complexity levels using descriptive and bivariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with Q4 complexity. RESULTS A total of 163,188 high-risk chronic patients were included. Compared with patients in the lower complexity quartile, those in Q4 were older (mean age 78.9 vs 75.6 years), had greater functional dependency (31.1% vs 14.2%), immobilization (18.9% vs 8.1%), and caregiver requirements (5.4% vs 2.4%), and had a higher morbidity burden (mean number of conditions 8.93 vs 6.31), medication use (10.0 vs 8.2 medications), and prevalence of polypharmacy (64.3% vs 47.7%). They also had more PHC contacts (29.6 vs 20.8 visits/year). In multivariable analysis, older age (OR 1.024 per year), heart failure (OR 2.874), neoplasm (OR 2.715), chronic kidney disease (OR 2.088), dementia (OR 1.987), caregiver presence (OR 1.393), polypharmacy (OR 1.161), and ≥20 PHC visits/year (OR 1.887) were positively associated with Q4 complexity, whereas female sex (OR 0.846) and greater functional independence (OR 0.669) were associated with lower odds of Q4 complexity (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS High-risk chronic patients in the highest AMG complexity quartile showed greater multimorbidity, functional impairment, medication burden, and PHC utilization. AMG complexity quartiles add value beyond high-risk status by identifying complex chronic patients with greater care needs and supporting targeted proactive care in PHC settings. These findings highlight the potential of routinely collected electronic health record and pharmacy data, combined with population-based risk stratification systems, as scalable tools for population health analysis and targeted health care planning in primary care.
- Open Access
- 26 June 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 593-599
A Way Forward for the MDCG 2019-16 Medical Device Security Guidance
MDCG 2019-16 is intended to assist practitioners in compliance with the Medical Device Regulation and the In-Vitro Device Regulation. This paper presents a gap analysis of MDCG 2019-16, identifying key gaps and proposing a robust set of recommendations to enhance the IoMT regulatory framework. This work has been undertaken by a selection of current (2023-2025) projects, all funded under the Horizon Europe call “Enhancing cybersecurity of connected medical devices”: HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01, and this paper summarises observations and recommendations from across these projects. There is considerable consensus across the projects in many recommendation themes, notably; linking cybersecurity with patient safety and privacy; keeping the guidelines current; and usage recipes for the guidelines. The paper also suggests toolkit solutions to address some of the recommendations.
- 26 June 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 593-599
Open AccessA Way Forward for the MDCG 2019-16 Medical Device Security Guidance
MDCG 2019-16 is intended to assist practitioners in compliance with the Medical Device Regulation and the In-Vitro Device Regulation. This paper presents a gap analysis of MDCG 2019-16, identifying key gaps and proposing a robust set of recommendations to enhance the IoMT regulatory framework. This work has been undertaken by a selection of current (2023-2025) projects, all funded under the Horizon Europe call “Enhancing cybersecurity of connected medical devices”: HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01, and this paper summarises observations and recommendations from across these projects. There is considerable consensus across the projects in many recommendation themes, notably; linking cybersecurity with patient safety and privacy; keeping the guidelines current; and usage recipes for the guidelines. The paper also suggests toolkit solutions to address some of the recommendations.