Anushua Banerjee
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Anushua Banerjee has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Arun Jayaraman
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
2 shared publications - Sara Nataletti
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
2 shared publications - Alex W. K. Wong
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
1 shared publication - Amber Wacek
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System
1 shared publication - Bradford D. Hendershot
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
1 shared publication - Henry L. Wyneken
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Characterizing Response to Personalized Intervention in Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: A Sensor-Based Approach to Rehabilitation
Question: Can a personalized post-rehabilitation intervention, guided by wearable sensor data, clinical outcomes, and expert review, improve functional mobility in individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA) who exhibit unmet mobility needs? Design: Prospective observational study with a nested intervention. Participants: Fifty-eight adults with LLA, recruited from military and civilian sites. Based on three months of community-based monitoring and clinical assessments, an expert panel identified 26 individuals as requiring additional support; 19 completed the intervention. Intervention: Tailored combinations of physical therapy, prosthetic adjustments, and/or motivational interviewing delivered over three months based on individual needs and goals. Outcome Measures: Performance-based tests, patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and progress toward self-defined mobility goals. Change from baseline was assessed using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Between-group comparisons (Responders vs Non-Responders), and equivalence testing with a non-intervention group were conducted. Results: Following intervention, 68% of participants improved in functional outcomes, goal attainment, or both. Among Responders, 46% exceeded the MCID for sit-to-stand performance, with 17– 33% meeting thresholds for other mobility and quality-of-life measures. Responders had lower body mass index, fewer comorbidities, showed greater gains in step count, physical performance and prosthesis-related quality of life. Equivalence testing showed Amputee Mobility Predictor scores among Sustained Responders became statistically comparable to those who never required intervention. Most participants maintained gains at follow-up. Conclusion: A personalized intervention approach guided by integrated data and experts review may improve real-world outcomes in individuals with LLA. These findings support reassessment to identify residual needs and deliver targeted support beyond standard care.
Open AccessCharacterizing Response to Personalized Intervention in Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: A Sensor-Based Approach to Rehabilitation
Question: Can a personalized post-rehabilitation intervention, guided by wearable sensor data, clinical outcomes, and expert review, improve functional mobility in individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA) who exhibit unmet mobility needs? Design: Prospective observational study with a nested intervention. Participants: Fifty-eight adults with LLA, recruited from military and civilian sites. Based on three months of community-based monitoring and clinical assessments, an expert panel identified 26 individuals as requiring additional support; 19 completed the intervention. Intervention: Tailored combinations of physical therapy, prosthetic adjustments, and/or motivational interviewing delivered over three months based on individual needs and goals. Outcome Measures: Performance-based tests, patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and progress toward self-defined mobility goals. Change from baseline was assessed using minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Between-group comparisons (Responders vs Non-Responders), and equivalence testing with a non-intervention group were conducted. Results: Following intervention, 68% of participants improved in functional outcomes, goal attainment, or both. Among Responders, 46% exceeded the MCID for sit-to-stand performance, with 17– 33% meeting thresholds for other mobility and quality-of-life measures. Responders had lower body mass index, fewer comorbidities, showed greater gains in step count, physical performance and prosthesis-related quality of life. Equivalence testing showed Amputee Mobility Predictor scores among Sustained Responders became statistically comparable to those who never required intervention. Most participants maintained gains at follow-up. Conclusion: A personalized intervention approach guided by integrated data and experts review may improve real-world outcomes in individuals with LLA. These findings support reassessment to identify residual needs and deliver targeted support beyond standard care.
- 28 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Disability and Health Journal
- Vol. 17 (4) , 101667
Developing a mobile exercise program for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Stakeholder perceptions of app features and implementation determinants
- 28 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Disability and Health Journal
- Vol. 17 (4) , 101667
Developing a mobile exercise program for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Stakeholder perceptions of app features and implementation determinants