Alberto J. L. Macario
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Alberto J. L. Macario has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Birgitte K. Ahring
<!--label omitted: 2-->Institute of Environmental Science and Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark2; and
1 shared publication- E. Conway de Macario
The University at Albany (SUNY)
1 shared publication Everly Conway De Macario
<!--label omitted: 1-->Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, The University at Albany, Albany, New York 12201-05091
1 shared publicationEverly Conway de Macario
1 shared publicationMarianne Lange
<!--label omitted: 2-->Institute of Environmental Science and Engineering, The Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark2; and
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 6 October 2005
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 353 (14) , 1489-1501
Sick Chaperones, Cellular Stress, and Disease
This review discusses the structure and function of molecular chaperones, with emphasis on their role in rescuing misfolded proteins. It also includes a discussion of the diseases in which abnormalities of these caretaker molecules or their molecular partners have been found.
- 6 October 2005
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 353 (14) , 1489-1501
Sick Chaperones, Cellular Stress, and Disease
This review discusses the structure and function of molecular chaperones, with emphasis on their role in rescuing misfolded proteins. It also includes a discussion of the diseases in which abnormalities of these caretaker molecules or their molecular partners have been found.
- 1 January 2004
- Published by IMR Press in Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark
- Vol. 9 (1-3) , 1318-32
Evolution of assisted protein folding: the distribution of the main chaperoning systems within the phylogenetic domain archaea
Newly made proteins must achieve a functional shape, the native configuration, before they can play their physiological roles in the cell. Proteins must also travel to the locale (e.g., the mitochondrion) in the cell where their functions are required. In these processes of folding into the native configuration and translocation to the place of work, proteins may be assisted by molecules called molecular chaperones. Stressors can unfold (denature) proteins, and genetic defects can cause misfolding and, in addition, both abnormalities can lead to polypeptide aggregation. Chaperones play a role in assisting refolding of partially denatured or misfolded proteins, thus preventing aggregation. Clearly, molecular chaperones are key cell components under normal, physiological circumstances, as well as in potentially harmful situations resulting from environmental or inherited factors. Hence, molecular chaperones constitute attractive targets for a variety of efforts aiming at improving the cell's performance, particularly under stress, to prevent disease, or at least to slow down its progression and to contain the deleterious effects of stress. In our efforts in this direction, we have undertaken to investigate the chaperoning systems of cells belonging to the phylogenetic domain Archaea. The findings reported here pertain to the distribution of the molecular chaperone machine, the chaperonins, and the prefoldins, among archaea. The genes hsp70(dnaK), hsp40(dnaJ), and grpE encoding the components of the molecular chaperone machine were present only in some archeaeal species: this contrasts with bacteria and eucarya, which do have the genes with no known exception. The group I, or bacterial, chaperonin-genes groEL and groES occured in the genomes of Methanosarcina species but were not found in any of the other archaea whose genomes have been sequenced. While all the archaea studied had between one and three chaperonins of group II (thermosome subunits), Methanosarcina acetivorans was exceptional since it had five of these chaperonins. This is the largest number of group II chaperonins ever found in a prokaryote. Furthermore, two of the M. acetivorans chaperonins were different from, albeit related to, the other known archaeal and eucaryal chaperonins of group II. Prefoldins were found in all archaea examined. Overall, the results provide clues to the evolution of the chaperoning systems, which must have played a critical role in survival since life started. Also, the data suggest new avenues of research for elucidating the evolution of assisted protein folding and for uncovering roles and interactions not yet described for these molecules.
- 1 January 2004
- Published by IMR Press in Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark
- Vol. 9 (1-3) , 1318-32
Evolution of assisted protein folding: the distribution of the main chaperoning systems within the phylogenetic domain archaea
Newly made proteins must achieve a functional shape, the native configuration, before they can play their physiological roles in the cell. Proteins must also travel to the locale (e.g., the mitochondrion) in the cell where their functions are required. In these processes of folding into the native configuration and translocation to the place of work, proteins may be assisted by molecules called molecular chaperones. Stressors can unfold (denature) proteins, and genetic defects can cause misfolding and, in addition, both abnormalities can lead to polypeptide aggregation. Chaperones play a role in assisting refolding of partially denatured or misfolded proteins, thus preventing aggregation. Clearly, molecular chaperones are key cell components under normal, physiological circumstances, as well as in potentially harmful situations resulting from environmental or inherited factors. Hence, molecular chaperones constitute attractive targets for a variety of efforts aiming at improving the cell's performance, particularly under stress, to prevent disease, or at least to slow down its progression and to contain the deleterious effects of stress. In our efforts in this direction, we have undertaken to investigate the chaperoning systems of cells belonging to the phylogenetic domain Archaea. The findings reported here pertain to the distribution of the molecular chaperone machine, the chaperonins, and the prefoldins, among archaea. The genes hsp70(dnaK), hsp40(dnaJ), and grpE encoding the components of the molecular chaperone machine were present only in some archeaeal species: this contrasts with bacteria and eucarya, which do have the genes with no known exception. The group I, or bacterial, chaperonin-genes groEL and groES occured in the genomes of Methanosarcina species but were not found in any of the other archaea whose genomes have been sequenced. While all the archaea studied had between one and three chaperonins of group II (thermosome subunits), Methanosarcina acetivorans was exceptional since it had five of these chaperonins. This is the largest number of group II chaperonins ever found in a prokaryote. Furthermore, two of the M. acetivorans chaperonins were different from, albeit related to, the other known archaeal and eucaryal chaperonins of group II. Prefoldins were found in all archaea examined. Overall, the results provide clues to the evolution of the chaperoning systems, which must have played a critical role in survival since life started. Also, the data suggest new avenues of research for elucidating the evolution of assisted protein folding and for uncovering roles and interactions not yet described for these molecules.
- 1 June 2000
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research
- Vol. 30 (2) , 49-66
Stress and molecular chaperones in disease
Stress, a common phenomenon in today’s society, is suspected of playing a role in the development of disease. Stressors of various types, psychological, physical, and biological, abound. They occur in the working and social environments, in air, soil, water, food, and medicines. Stressors impact on cells directly or indirectly, cause protein denaturation, and elicit a stress response. This is mediated by stress (heat-shock) genes and proteins, among which are those named molecular chaperones because they assist other proteins to achieve and maintain a functional shape (the native configuration), and to recover it when partially lost due to stress. Denatured proteins tend to aggregate and precipitate. The same occurs with abnormal proteins due to mutations, or to failure of post-transcriptional or post-translational mechanisms. These abnormal proteins need the help of molecular chaperones as much as denatured molecules do, especially during stress. A cell with normal antistress mechanisms, including a complete and functional set of chaperones, may be able to withstand stress if its intensity is not beyond that which will cause irreversible protein damage. There is a certain threshold that normal cells have above which they cannot cope with stress. A cell with an abnormal protein that has an intrinsic tendency to misfold and aggregate is more vulnerable to stress than normal counterparts. Furthermore, these abnormal proteins may precipitate even in the absence of stress and cause diseases named proteinopathies. It is possible that stress contributes to the pathogenesis of proteinopathies by promoting protein aggregation, even in cells that possess a normal chaperoning system. Examples of proteinopathies are age-related degenerative disorders with protein deposits in various tissues, most importantly in the brain where the deposits are associated with neuronal degeneration. It is conceivable that stress enhances the progression of these diseases by facilitating protein unfolding and misfolding, which lead to aggregation and deposition. A number of reports in the last few years have described research aimed at elucidating the role of heatshock proteins, molecular chaperones in particular, in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. The findings begin to shed light on the molecular mechanism of protein aggregation and deposition, and of the ensuing cell death. The results also begin to elucidate the role of molecular chaperones in pathogenesis. This is a fascinating area of research with great clinical implications. Although there are already several experimental models for the study of proteinopathies, others should be developed using organisms that are better known now than only a few years ago and that offer unique advantages. Use of these systems and of information available in databases from genome sequencing efforts should boost research in this field. It should be possible in the not-too-distant future to develop therapeutic and preventive means for proteinopathies based on the use of heat-shock protein and molecular chaperone genes and proteins.
- 1 June 2000
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research
- Vol. 30 (2) , 49-66
Stress and molecular chaperones in disease
Stress, a common phenomenon in today’s society, is suspected of playing a role in the development of disease. Stressors of various types, psychological, physical, and biological, abound. They occur in the working and social environments, in air, soil, water, food, and medicines. Stressors impact on cells directly or indirectly, cause protein denaturation, and elicit a stress response. This is mediated by stress (heat-shock) genes and proteins, among which are those named molecular chaperones because they assist other proteins to achieve and maintain a functional shape (the native configuration), and to recover it when partially lost due to stress. Denatured proteins tend to aggregate and precipitate. The same occurs with abnormal proteins due to mutations, or to failure of post-transcriptional or post-translational mechanisms. These abnormal proteins need the help of molecular chaperones as much as denatured molecules do, especially during stress. A cell with normal antistress mechanisms, including a complete and functional set of chaperones, may be able to withstand stress if its intensity is not beyond that which will cause irreversible protein damage. There is a certain threshold that normal cells have above which they cannot cope with stress. A cell with an abnormal protein that has an intrinsic tendency to misfold and aggregate is more vulnerable to stress than normal counterparts. Furthermore, these abnormal proteins may precipitate even in the absence of stress and cause diseases named proteinopathies. It is possible that stress contributes to the pathogenesis of proteinopathies by promoting protein aggregation, even in cells that possess a normal chaperoning system. Examples of proteinopathies are age-related degenerative disorders with protein deposits in various tissues, most importantly in the brain where the deposits are associated with neuronal degeneration. It is conceivable that stress enhances the progression of these diseases by facilitating protein unfolding and misfolding, which lead to aggregation and deposition. A number of reports in the last few years have described research aimed at elucidating the role of heatshock proteins, molecular chaperones in particular, in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. The findings begin to shed light on the molecular mechanism of protein aggregation and deposition, and of the ensuing cell death. The results also begin to elucidate the role of molecular chaperones in pathogenesis. This is a fascinating area of research with great clinical implications. Although there are already several experimental models for the study of proteinopathies, others should be developed using organisms that are better known now than only a few years ago and that offer unique advantages. Use of these systems and of information available in databases from genome sequencing efforts should boost research in this field. It should be possible in the not-too-distant future to develop therapeutic and preventive means for proteinopathies based on the use of heat-shock protein and molecular chaperone genes and proteins.
- 1 December 1999
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Vol. 63 (4) , 923-967
Stress Genes and Proteins in the Archaea
SUMMARY: The field covered in this review is new; the first sequence of a gene encoding the molecular chaperone Hsp70 and the first description of a chaperonin in the archaea were reported in 1991. These findings boosted research in other areas beyond the archaea that were directly relevant to bacteria and eukaryotes, for example, stress gene regulation, the structure-function relationship of the chaperonin complex, protein-based molecular phylogeny of organisms and eukaryotic-cell organelles, molecular biology and biochemistry of life in extreme environments, and stress tolerance at the cellular and molecular levels. In the last 8 years, archaeal stress genes and proteins belonging to the families Hsp70, Hsp60 (chaperonins), Hsp40(DnaJ), and small heat-shock proteins (sHsp) have been studied. The hsp70(dnaK), hsp40(dnaJ), and grpE genes (the chaperone machine) have been sequenced in seven, four, and two species, respectively, but their expression has been examined in detail only in the mesophilic methanogen Methanosarcina mazei S-6. The proteins possess markers typical of bacterial homologs but none of the signatures distinctive of eukaryotes. In contrast, gene expression and transcription initiation signals and factors are of the eucaryal type, which suggests a hybrid archaeal-bacterial complexion for the Hsp70 system. Another remarkable feature is that several archaeal species in different phylogenetic branches do not have the gene hsp70(dnaK), an evolutionary puzzle that raises the important question of what replaces the product of this gene, Hsp70(DnaK), in protein biogenesis and refolding and for stress resistance. Although archaea are prokaryotes like bacteria, their Hsp60 (chaperonin) family is of type (group) II, similar to that of the eukaryotic cytosol; however, unlike the latter, which has several different members, the archaeal chaperonin system usually includes only two (in some species one and in others possibly three) related subunits of ∼60 kDa. These form, in various combinations depending on the species, a large structure or chaperonin complex sometimes called the thermosome. This multimolecular assembly is similar to the bacterial chaperonin complex GroEL/S, but it is made of only the large, double-ring oligomers each with eight (or nine) subunits instead of seven as in the bacterial complex. Like Hsp70(DnaK), the archaeal chaperonin subunits are remarkable for their evolution, but for a different reason. Ubiquitous among archaea, the chaperonins show a pattern of recurrent gene duplication—hetero-oligomeric chaperonin complexes appear to have evolved several times independently. The stress response and stress tolerance in the archaea involve chaperones, chaperonins, other heat shock (stress) proteins including sHsp, thermoprotectants, the proteasome, as yet incompletely understood thermoresistant features of many molecules, and formation of multicellular structures. The latter structures include single- and mixed-species (bacterial-archaeal) types. Many questions remain unanswered, and the field offers extraordinary opportunities owing to the diversity, genetic makeup, and phylogenetic position of archaea and the variety of ecosystems they inhabit. Specific aspects that deserve investigation are elucidation of the mechanism of action of the chaperonin complex at different temperatures, identification of the partners and substitutes for the Hsp70 chaperone machine, analysis of protein folding and refolding in hyperthermophiles, and determination of the molecular mechanisms involved in stress gene regulation in archaeal species that thrive under widely different conditions (temperature, pH, osmolarity, and barometric pressure). These studies are now possible with uni- and multicellular archaeal models and are relevant to various areas of basic and applied research, including exploration and conquest of ecosystems inhospitable to humans and many mammals and plants.
- 1 December 1999
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Vol. 63 (4) , 923-967
Stress Genes and Proteins in the Archaea
SUMMARY: The field covered in this review is new; the first sequence of a gene encoding the molecular chaperone Hsp70 and the first description of a chaperonin in the archaea were reported in 1991. These findings boosted research in other areas beyond the archaea that were directly relevant to bacteria and eukaryotes, for example, stress gene regulation, the structure-function relationship of the chaperonin complex, protein-based molecular phylogeny of organisms and eukaryotic-cell organelles, molecular biology and biochemistry of life in extreme environments, and stress tolerance at the cellular and molecular levels. In the last 8 years, archaeal stress genes and proteins belonging to the families Hsp70, Hsp60 (chaperonins), Hsp40(DnaJ), and small heat-shock proteins (sHsp) have been studied. The hsp70(dnaK), hsp40(dnaJ), and grpE genes (the chaperone machine) have been sequenced in seven, four, and two species, respectively, but their expression has been examined in detail only in the mesophilic methanogen Methanosarcina mazei S-6. The proteins possess markers typical of bacterial homologs but none of the signatures distinctive of eukaryotes. In contrast, gene expression and transcription initiation signals and factors are of the eucaryal type, which suggests a hybrid archaeal-bacterial complexion for the Hsp70 system. Another remarkable feature is that several archaeal species in different phylogenetic branches do not have the gene hsp70(dnaK), an evolutionary puzzle that raises the important question of what replaces the product of this gene, Hsp70(DnaK), in protein biogenesis and refolding and for stress resistance. Although archaea are prokaryotes like bacteria, their Hsp60 (chaperonin) family is of type (group) II, similar to that of the eukaryotic cytosol; however, unlike the latter, which has several different members, the archaeal chaperonin system usually includes only two (in some species one and in others possibly three) related subunits of ∼60 kDa. These form, in various combinations depending on the species, a large structure or chaperonin complex sometimes called the thermosome. This multimolecular assembly is similar to the bacterial chaperonin complex GroEL/S, but it is made of only the large, double-ring oligomers each with eight (or nine) subunits instead of seven as in the bacterial complex. Like Hsp70(DnaK), the archaeal chaperonin subunits are remarkable for their evolution, but for a different reason. Ubiquitous among archaea, the chaperonins show a pattern of recurrent gene duplication—hetero-oligomeric chaperonin complexes appear to have evolved several times independently. The stress response and stress tolerance in the archaea involve chaperones, chaperonins, other heat shock (stress) proteins including sHsp, thermoprotectants, the proteasome, as yet incompletely understood thermoresistant features of many molecules, and formation of multicellular structures. The latter structures include single- and mixed-species (bacterial-archaeal) types. Many questions remain unanswered, and the field offers extraordinary opportunities owing to the diversity, genetic makeup, and phylogenetic position of archaea and the variety of ecosystems they inhabit. Specific aspects that deserve investigation are elucidation of the mechanism of action of the chaperonin complex at different temperatures, identification of the partners and substitutes for the Hsp70 chaperone machine, analysis of protein folding and refolding in hyperthermophiles, and determination of the molecular mechanisms involved in stress gene regulation in archaeal species that thrive under widely different conditions (temperature, pH, osmolarity, and barometric pressure). These studies are now possible with uni- and multicellular archaeal models and are relevant to various areas of basic and applied research, including exploration and conquest of ecosystems inhospitable to humans and many mammals and plants.