Cassidy C. Keating
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Cassidy C. Keating has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alina De La Mota-Peynado
Foreign Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Manhattan, KS 66505, USA
1 shared publication - Barbara Graham
Center for Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
1 shared publication - Chester D. McDowell
Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
1 shared publication - Emma K. Harris
Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Center for Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
1 shared publication - Erin M. Borland
Center for Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
1 shared publication - J. Brian Kimble
Foreign Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Manhattan, KS 66505, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Co-Infection of Culex tarsalis Mosquitoes with Rift Valley Fever Phlebovirus Strains Results in Efficient Viral Reassortment
Rift Valley fever phlebovirus (RVFV) is a zoonotic mosquito-borne pathogen endemic to sub-Saharan Africa and the Arabian Peninsula which causes Rift Valley fever in ruminant livestock and humans. Co-infection with divergent viral strains can produce reassortment among the L, S, and M segments of the RVFV genome. Reassortment events can produce novel genotypes with altered virulence, transmission dynamics, and/or mosquito host range. This can have severe implications in areas where RVFV is endemic and convolutes our ability to anticipate transmission and circulation in novel geographic regions. Previously, we evaluated the frequency of RVFV reassortment in a susceptible ruminant host and observed low rates of reassortment (0–1.7%). Here, we tested the hypothesis that reassortment occurs predominantly in the mosquito using a highly permissive vector, Culex tarsalis. Cells derived from Cx. tarsalis or adult mosquitoes were co-infected with either two virulent (Kenya-128B-15 and SA01-1322) or a virulent and attenuated (Kenya-128B-15 and MP-12) strain of RVFV. Our results showed approximately 2% of virus genotypes isolated from co-infected Cx. tarsalis-derived cells were reassortant. Co-infected mosquitoes infected via infectious bloodmeal resulted in a higher percentage of reassortant virus (2–60%) isolated from midgut and salivary tissues at 14 days post-infection. The percentage of reassortant genotypes isolated from the midguts of mosquitoes co-infected with Kenya-128B-15 and SA01-1322 was similar to that of mosquitoes co-infected with Kenya-128B-15 and MP-12- strains (60 vs. 47%). However, only 2% of virus isolated from the salivary glands of Kenya-128B-15 and SA01-1322 co-infected mosquitoes represented reassortant genotypes. This was contrasted by 54% reassortment in the salivary glands of mosquitoes co-infected with Kenya-128B-15 and MP-12 strains. Furthermore, we observed preferential inclusion of genomic segments from the three parental strains among the reassorted viruses. Replication curves of select reassorted genotypes were significantly higher in Vero cells but not in Culex—derived cells. These data imply that mosquitoes play a crucial role in the reassortment of RVFV and potentially contribute to driving evolution of the virus.
Open AccessCo-Infection of Culex tarsalis Mosquitoes with Rift Valley Fever Phlebovirus Strains Results in Efficient Viral Reassortment
Rift Valley fever phlebovirus (RVFV) is a zoonotic mosquito-borne pathogen endemic to sub-Saharan Africa and the Arabian Peninsula which causes Rift Valley fever in ruminant livestock and humans. Co-infection with divergent viral strains can produce reassortment among the L, S, and M segments of the RVFV genome. Reassortment events can produce novel genotypes with altered virulence, transmission dynamics, and/or mosquito host range. This can have severe implications in areas where RVFV is endemic and convolutes our ability to anticipate transmission and circulation in novel geographic regions. Previously, we evaluated the frequency of RVFV reassortment in a susceptible ruminant host and observed low rates of reassortment (0–1.7%). Here, we tested the hypothesis that reassortment occurs predominantly in the mosquito using a highly permissive vector, Culex tarsalis. Cells derived from Cx. tarsalis or adult mosquitoes were co-infected with either two virulent (Kenya-128B-15 and SA01-1322) or a virulent and attenuated (Kenya-128B-15 and MP-12) strain of RVFV. Our results showed approximately 2% of virus genotypes isolated from co-infected Cx. tarsalis-derived cells were reassortant. Co-infected mosquitoes infected via infectious bloodmeal resulted in a higher percentage of reassortant virus (2–60%) isolated from midgut and salivary tissues at 14 days post-infection. The percentage of reassortant genotypes isolated from the midguts of mosquitoes co-infected with Kenya-128B-15 and SA01-1322 was similar to that of mosquitoes co-infected with Kenya-128B-15 and MP-12- strains (60 vs. 47%). However, only 2% of virus isolated from the salivary glands of Kenya-128B-15 and SA01-1322 co-infected mosquitoes represented reassortant genotypes. This was contrasted by 54% reassortment in the salivary glands of mosquitoes co-infected with Kenya-128B-15 and MP-12 strains. Furthermore, we observed preferential inclusion of genomic segments from the three parental strains among the reassorted viruses. Replication curves of select reassorted genotypes were significantly higher in Vero cells but not in Culex—derived cells. These data imply that mosquitoes play a crucial role in the reassortment of RVFV and potentially contribute to driving evolution of the virus.
- Open Access
The Effect of Sample Handling on Rabies-Neutralizing Antibody Stability
The measurement of rabies-neutralizing antibody is important for monitoring the response to rabies vaccination. For all the purposes of measurement, such as routine monitoring of vaccine response in humans and animals, serosurveys, and biologics qualification, accurate and precise results are necessary. The risks associated with sample handling variation, which may impact the test results, can be overlooked within a laboratory. To determine the robustness of rabies-neutralizing antibodies in human and animal serum, samples were treated to mimic various possible deviations in the sample handling protocols. Potential deviations were designed to investigate common client inquiries and possible sample conditions experienced during shipping, storage, and laboratory processes. The treatments included the duration that sera were kept at a temperature greater than that of a refrigerator (room temperature, zero hours to two weeks), the number and duration of heat inactivation treatments (i.e., heat inactivation directly from freezer storage, etc.), the number of freeze–thaw cycles (zero, four, or six cycles), and the storage duration of sample dilutions in chamber slides before the addition of virus (zero hours to overnight). The results provided evidence for the robustness of rabies antibodies and the antibodies’ neutralizing function in uncontaminated, clear human and animal serum. In addition, prolonged heat exposure was identified as exerting the greatest impact on the measurement of rabies antibodies.
Open AccessThe Effect of Sample Handling on Rabies-Neutralizing Antibody Stability
The measurement of rabies-neutralizing antibody is important for monitoring the response to rabies vaccination. For all the purposes of measurement, such as routine monitoring of vaccine response in humans and animals, serosurveys, and biologics qualification, accurate and precise results are necessary. The risks associated with sample handling variation, which may impact the test results, can be overlooked within a laboratory. To determine the robustness of rabies-neutralizing antibodies in human and animal serum, samples were treated to mimic various possible deviations in the sample handling protocols. Potential deviations were designed to investigate common client inquiries and possible sample conditions experienced during shipping, storage, and laboratory processes. The treatments included the duration that sera were kept at a temperature greater than that of a refrigerator (room temperature, zero hours to two weeks), the number and duration of heat inactivation treatments (i.e., heat inactivation directly from freezer storage, etc.), the number of freeze–thaw cycles (zero, four, or six cycles), and the storage duration of sample dilutions in chamber slides before the addition of virus (zero hours to overnight). The results provided evidence for the robustness of rabies antibodies and the antibodies’ neutralizing function in uncontaminated, clear human and animal serum. In addition, prolonged heat exposure was identified as exerting the greatest impact on the measurement of rabies antibodies.