Binghua Xu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Binghua Xu has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Wenzhao Xu
Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Xuhuai Region in Jiangsu, Huai’an 223001, China
2 shared publications - Yudong Sun
Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biology of Hainan Province/ Vegetable Research Institute, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571100, China
2 shared publications - Changwei Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
1 shared publication - Cong Jin
Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China
1 shared publication - De-Xu Luo
Facilities Vegetable Centre, Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Science in Xuhuai Area of Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223001, China
1 shared publication - Jianfeng Zhao
Facilities Vegetable Centre, Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Science in Xuhuai Area of Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223001, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Horticulturae
- Vol. 11 (11) , 1374
A Comparative Analysis of High-Throughput and Conventional Phenotyping: Validation of Plantarray System and Dynamic Physiological Traits for Drought Tolerance in Watermelon
Drought stress is a major constraint on watermelon production worldwide. Conventional phenotyping methods for drought tolerance are often low-throughput and fail to capture dynamic physiological responses. This study validated the high-throughput phenotyping platform (Plantarray 3.0) against conventional methods by dynamically evaluating drought tolerance across 30 genetically diverse watermelon accessions. The Plantarray system quantified key dynamic traits, including transpiration rate (TR), transpiration maintenance ratio (TMR), and transpiration recovery ratios (TRRs), revealing distinct drought-response strategies. Principal component analysis (PCA) of these dynamic traits explained 96.4% of the total variance (PC1: 75.5%, PC2: 20.9%), clearly differentiating genotypes. A highly significant correlation (R = 0.941, p < 0.001) was found between the comprehensive drought tolerance rankings derived from Plantarray and conventional phenotyping. We identified five genotypes as highly tolerant and four as highly sensitive. The elite drought-tolerant germplasm, notably the wild species PI 537300 (Citrullus colocynthis) and the cultivated variety G42 (Citrullus lanatus), exhibited superior physiological performance and recovery capacity. The results demonstrate that the Plantarray system not only efficiently screens for drought tolerance but also provides deep insights into dynamic resistance mechanisms, offering a powerful tool and valuable genetic resources for breeding climate-resilient watermelon cultivars.
- 14 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Horticulturae
- Vol. 11 (11) , 1374
Open AccessA Comparative Analysis of High-Throughput and Conventional Phenotyping: Validation of Plantarray System and Dynamic Physiological Traits for Drought Tolerance in Watermelon
Drought stress is a major constraint on watermelon production worldwide. Conventional phenotyping methods for drought tolerance are often low-throughput and fail to capture dynamic physiological responses. This study validated the high-throughput phenotyping platform (Plantarray 3.0) against conventional methods by dynamically evaluating drought tolerance across 30 genetically diverse watermelon accessions. The Plantarray system quantified key dynamic traits, including transpiration rate (TR), transpiration maintenance ratio (TMR), and transpiration recovery ratios (TRRs), revealing distinct drought-response strategies. Principal component analysis (PCA) of these dynamic traits explained 96.4% of the total variance (PC1: 75.5%, PC2: 20.9%), clearly differentiating genotypes. A highly significant correlation (R = 0.941, p < 0.001) was found between the comprehensive drought tolerance rankings derived from Plantarray and conventional phenotyping. We identified five genotypes as highly tolerant and four as highly sensitive. The elite drought-tolerant germplasm, notably the wild species PI 537300 (Citrullus colocynthis) and the cultivated variety G42 (Citrullus lanatus), exhibited superior physiological performance and recovery capacity. The results demonstrate that the Plantarray system not only efficiently screens for drought tolerance but also provides deep insights into dynamic resistance mechanisms, offering a powerful tool and valuable genetic resources for breeding climate-resilient watermelon cultivars.
- Open Access
Sugar Accumulation Patterns and Transcriptome Analysis during the Developmental Stage of Small-Fruit Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.)
The sugar content in watermelon significantly influences its flavor. To understand the sugar accumulation pattern in small-fruited watermelon and identify candidate genes involved in sugar synthesis and conversion, we measured the sugar content (sucrose, fructose, and glucose) at five developmental stages: 10d, 16d, 22d, 28d, and 34d post-pollination. Two watermelon varieties with the largest sugar content difference at 28d post-pollination (high-sugar G38-28 and low-sugar 482276-28) were selected for transcriptome sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were validated using RT-qPCR. Additionally, the sugar contents of three commercial varieties (‘Su Meng NO.5’, ‘Su Meng NO.6’, ‘Su Meng NO.7’) and their parents were compared at five stages. Results showed glucose and fructose levels peaked between 22d and 28d, followed by a decrease, while sucrose content continuously increased. F1 hybrids exhibited glucose and sucrose trends similar to their paternal parent and fructose trends similar to their maternal parent. Transcriptome sequencing identified 9337 DEGs (5072 upregulated and 4265 downregulated). Gene Ontology analysis highlighted overrepresentation in categories such as pectinase and oxidoreductase activity. KEGG analysis identified 12 DEGs involved in sugar synthesis and conversion pathways, including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and pentose and glucuronate interconversions. RT-qPCR validation corroborated the transcriptome data. These findings explain the distinct sugar accumulation patterns in G38-28 and 482276-28 at the transcriptional level, offering insights for genetic breeding and regulation of key sugar-related genes in watermelon.
Open AccessSugar Accumulation Patterns and Transcriptome Analysis during the Developmental Stage of Small-Fruit Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.)
The sugar content in watermelon significantly influences its flavor. To understand the sugar accumulation pattern in small-fruited watermelon and identify candidate genes involved in sugar synthesis and conversion, we measured the sugar content (sucrose, fructose, and glucose) at five developmental stages: 10d, 16d, 22d, 28d, and 34d post-pollination. Two watermelon varieties with the largest sugar content difference at 28d post-pollination (high-sugar G38-28 and low-sugar 482276-28) were selected for transcriptome sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were validated using RT-qPCR. Additionally, the sugar contents of three commercial varieties (‘Su Meng NO.5’, ‘Su Meng NO.6’, ‘Su Meng NO.7’) and their parents were compared at five stages. Results showed glucose and fructose levels peaked between 22d and 28d, followed by a decrease, while sucrose content continuously increased. F1 hybrids exhibited glucose and sucrose trends similar to their paternal parent and fructose trends similar to their maternal parent. Transcriptome sequencing identified 9337 DEGs (5072 upregulated and 4265 downregulated). Gene Ontology analysis highlighted overrepresentation in categories such as pectinase and oxidoreductase activity. KEGG analysis identified 12 DEGs involved in sugar synthesis and conversion pathways, including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and pentose and glucuronate interconversions. RT-qPCR validation corroborated the transcriptome data. These findings explain the distinct sugar accumulation patterns in G38-28 and 482276-28 at the transcriptional level, offering insights for genetic breeding and regulation of key sugar-related genes in watermelon.