Jiahao Ren
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jiahao Ren has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Huijun Tan
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
2 shared publications - Zhenlong Wu
Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics
2 shared publications - Dongpo Li
AVIC (Aviation Industry Corporation of China) (Chengdu) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611743, China
1 shared publication - Dongpo Li
AVIC (Aviation Industry Corporation of China) (Chengdu) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611743, China
1 shared publication - Li-Ming Yang
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1 , Nanjing, Jiangsu
1 shared publication - Mingshuang Shi
Association for Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Numerical Study on the Aerodynamic Performance of a UAV S-Shaped Inlet with Grilles
This investigation designs grilles of two configurations inside an S-shaped inlet for UAVs. The present work numerically investigates the effects of the configurations, numbers, diameters, and lengths of the grilles on the inlet aerodynamic performance under different flight conditions, such as airflow Mach number, angle of attack, and sideslip angle. The influences of the baseline configuration, Configuration 1, and Configuration 2 on the aerodynamic performance of the inlet are systematically compared. The numerical results show that after installing the grilles, the total pressure recovery decreases by an average of 5.42% for Configuration 1 and 3.46% for Configuration 2. In terms of the absolute circumferential total pressure distortion, which decreases by 1.26% for Configuration 1 and 2.34% for Configuration 2, the swirl distortion index of Configuration 2 approaches zero. It is found that a large sideslip angle significantly degrades the inlet performance, and Configuration 1 experiences the maximum decline of approximately 0.0124 in the total pressure recovery. Based on the optimized design of Configuration 1, the optimal parameters are determined as 5 grille rows, a grille diameter of 4 mm, and a grille length of 6 mm. This configuration achieves an optimal balance between flow regulation and resistance suppression, with a maximum total pressure recovery of 0.9884 and the absolute circumferential total pressure distortion controlled below 0.015. This study clarifies the optimization direction of key parameters for grilles and provides a theoretical basis and technical reference for the design of UAV S-shaped inlet and grille integrations.
Open AccessNumerical Study on the Aerodynamic Performance of a UAV S-Shaped Inlet with Grilles
This investigation designs grilles of two configurations inside an S-shaped inlet for UAVs. The present work numerically investigates the effects of the configurations, numbers, diameters, and lengths of the grilles on the inlet aerodynamic performance under different flight conditions, such as airflow Mach number, angle of attack, and sideslip angle. The influences of the baseline configuration, Configuration 1, and Configuration 2 on the aerodynamic performance of the inlet are systematically compared. The numerical results show that after installing the grilles, the total pressure recovery decreases by an average of 5.42% for Configuration 1 and 3.46% for Configuration 2. In terms of the absolute circumferential total pressure distortion, which decreases by 1.26% for Configuration 1 and 2.34% for Configuration 2, the swirl distortion index of Configuration 2 approaches zero. It is found that a large sideslip angle significantly degrades the inlet performance, and Configuration 1 experiences the maximum decline of approximately 0.0124 in the total pressure recovery. Based on the optimized design of Configuration 1, the optimal parameters are determined as 5 grille rows, a grille diameter of 4 mm, and a grille length of 6 mm. This configuration achieves an optimal balance between flow regulation and resistance suppression, with a maximum total pressure recovery of 0.9884 and the absolute circumferential total pressure distortion controlled below 0.015. This study clarifies the optimization direction of key parameters for grilles and provides a theoretical basis and technical reference for the design of UAV S-shaped inlet and grille integrations.
- Open Access
Experimental Study of the Aerodynamic Performance and Flow Characteristics of an Integrated UAV Inlet with Double 90° Bends
Many UAVs today have an S-bend inlet for the sake of stealth; however, the majority of them have a relatively gentle transition of the flow channel. This study presents an experimental investigation of the aerodynamic performance and swirl flow characteristics of a UAV inlet with double 90° bends, which is also integrated with an aircraft fuselage as well as a volute. The influences of angle of attack, sideslip angle, AIP Mach number and freestream speed are explored in detail. The influences of the deflectors installed ahead of the first 90° bend of the inlet and the baffle installed at the bottom of the volute are revealed. It is found that both the deflectors and the baffle are beneficial in enhancing the aerodynamic performance of the inlet and alleviating the intensity of the swirl flow inside the volute.
Open AccessExperimental Study of the Aerodynamic Performance and Flow Characteristics of an Integrated UAV Inlet with Double 90° Bends
Many UAVs today have an S-bend inlet for the sake of stealth; however, the majority of them have a relatively gentle transition of the flow channel. This study presents an experimental investigation of the aerodynamic performance and swirl flow characteristics of a UAV inlet with double 90° bends, which is also integrated with an aircraft fuselage as well as a volute. The influences of angle of attack, sideslip angle, AIP Mach number and freestream speed are explored in detail. The influences of the deflectors installed ahead of the first 90° bend of the inlet and the baffle installed at the bottom of the volute are revealed. It is found that both the deflectors and the baffle are beneficial in enhancing the aerodynamic performance of the inlet and alleviating the intensity of the swirl flow inside the volute.