Kookjin Huh

Background/Objectives: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) commonly occurs in patients undergoing urologic surgery and significantly affects patient comfort and recovery. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of continuous local ropivacaine infusion using a specialized multi-porous urethral catheter in reducing postoperative CRBD. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind trial enrolled 136 male patients undergoing short-term catheterization after urologic surgery. Participants were randomized into three groups—a control group receiving saline infusion, Group 1 receiving 0.5% ropivacaine at 1 mL/h, and Group 2 receiving 0.5% ropivacaine at 2 mL/h—for up to 48 h via a multi-porous urethral catheter. The primary outcome was the incidence of CRBD at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included changes in urethral pain assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), urinary symptom scores, complication rates, and patient-reported catheter inconvenience and reuse intention using Likert scales. Results: The incidence of CRBD was significantly lower in Group 1 (19.6%) and Group 2 (11.1%) compared to the control group (44.4%; p = 0.001), demonstrating a clear dose–response relationship. Changes in urethral pain scores (VAS) from baseline were significantly lower in the ropivacaine groups compared to the control (p = 0.023). Complication rates were similar among groups (control 13.3%, Group 1 6.5%, Group 2 15.6%; p = 0.378), although catheter leakage occurred more frequently in Group 2, without statistical significance (p = 0.122). Conclusions: Continuous local ropivacaine infusion using a multi-porous urethral catheter effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative CRBD without increasing side effects. This approach may improve patient comfort during perioperative catheter management.

Background: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) has been found in many patients with urologic surgery. The authors investigated the effect of analgesic-eluting urethral catheters on postoperative CRBD. Methods: 60 subjects scheduled for urologic surgery requiring urethral catheterization were randomized prospectively to one of three groups (control arm, 0.5% ropivacaine 1 mL/h arm [Study 1 arm] and 0.5% ropivacaine 2 mL/h arm [Study 2 arm]; n = 20 each). The incidence and severity of CRBD were evaluated postoperatively at 24 h as primary outcomes. The incidence of adverse events regarding urethral catheter utilization was assessed as a secondary outcome. Results: The CRBD incidence at 24 h postoperatively in the control, study 1 and study 2 arms was 50.0%, 10.0%, and 15.0%, respectively (p = 0.002). The CRBD severity at 24 h postoperatively showed that patients in the study 1 and study 2 arms had significantly less postoperative CRBD than those in the control arm (visual analog score [VAS]; the mean VAS of the control, study 1, and study 2 arms: 2.1 vs. 1.6 vs. 0.9, p = 0.045). Urethral pain regarding catheter was significantly less severe in the study arms than in the control (VAS score: 6.2 vs. 1.5 vs. 1.4, p < 0.001). The severity and incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly among groups (p = 0.287). Peri-catheter leakage was more frequent in the study 2 arm (p = 0.057). Conclusion: The proper usage of a ropivacaine-eluting catheter can not only alleviate CRBD but reduce catheter-related urethral pain in patients with urologic surgery followed by catheterization, without major adverse events.