Sarah Baca
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Sarah Baca has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Julia Raykin
Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
3 shared publications - Oscar Rincón-Guevara
Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA 30333
2 shared publications - Alexandra F. Dalton
Coronavirus & Other Respiratory Viruses Division (CORVD), National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., NE, Mailstop US1-1, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA
1 shared publication Brian Wakeman
Viral Vaccine Preventable Disease Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
1 shared publicationCria O Gregory
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
1 shared publication- David E. Sugerman
Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 16 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (10)
Risk of Post-COVID-19 Conditions Among Adolescents and Adults Who Received Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for Acute COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background: Post-COVID-19 Conditions (PCC) potentially affect millions of people, but it is unclear whether treating acute COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may reduce the risk of PCC. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using real-world, closed claims data to assess the relationship between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and PCC by age group (12–17, 18–49, 50–64, ≥65 years). Eligible patients had a COVID-19 index date (positive laboratory test, ICD-10 diagnosis code, or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir prescription) from 1 April to 31 August 2022, in the outpatient, telehealth, or emergency department setting, and had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 based on age (≥50 years) or underlying risk factors. Treated patients (ie, received a nirmatrelvir-ritonavir prescription within ±5 days of index date) were matched 1:2 on age, sex, month of index date, and HHS region with untreated patients. PCC was defined by the presence of ≥1 of 45 new-onset symptoms or conditions recorded ≥60 days after index date. Results: Of the treated patients, 291 433 were matched to 582 866 untreated patients. Treatment with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduced PCC risk in adults 50–64 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–0.95) and ≥65 years (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.87–0.90). Treatment had minimal effect among high-risk adults 18–49 years (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.99) and no effect among high-risk adolescents 12–17 years (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.66–1.13). Conclusions: Results using real-world data suggest a protective relationship between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir during acute illness and PCC risk among older adults, but not among adolescents. Consideration may be given to outpatient treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir to reduce the risk of severe disease and PCC.
- 16 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (10)
Risk of Post-COVID-19 Conditions Among Adolescents and Adults Who Received Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for Acute COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background: Post-COVID-19 Conditions (PCC) potentially affect millions of people, but it is unclear whether treating acute COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may reduce the risk of PCC. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using real-world, closed claims data to assess the relationship between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and PCC by age group (12–17, 18–49, 50–64, ≥65 years). Eligible patients had a COVID-19 index date (positive laboratory test, ICD-10 diagnosis code, or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir prescription) from 1 April to 31 August 2022, in the outpatient, telehealth, or emergency department setting, and had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 based on age (≥50 years) or underlying risk factors. Treated patients (ie, received a nirmatrelvir-ritonavir prescription within ±5 days of index date) were matched 1:2 on age, sex, month of index date, and HHS region with untreated patients. PCC was defined by the presence of ≥1 of 45 new-onset symptoms or conditions recorded ≥60 days after index date. Results: Of the treated patients, 291 433 were matched to 582 866 untreated patients. Treatment with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduced PCC risk in adults 50–64 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–0.95) and ≥65 years (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.87–0.90). Treatment had minimal effect among high-risk adults 18–49 years (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.99) and no effect among high-risk adolescents 12–17 years (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.66–1.13). Conclusions: Results using real-world data suggest a protective relationship between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir during acute illness and PCC risk among older adults, but not among adolescents. Consideration may be given to outpatient treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir to reduce the risk of severe disease and PCC.
- 30 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 69 (1) , 107627
Varicella-Zoster Virus Testing in Clinical Practice in the U.S., 2016–2023
- 30 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 69 (1) , 107627
Varicella-Zoster Virus Testing in Clinical Practice in the U.S., 2016–2023
- 23 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 67 (6) , 973-977
Appropriateness of Immunoglobulin M Testing for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella
- 23 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 67 (6) , 973-977
Appropriateness of Immunoglobulin M Testing for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella