Abdurauf Satoti

Humans typically describe spatial location using names, hierarchies, and relative positions (e.g., east of, inside), yet mainstream GIS represents places primarily through geometric coordinates, rendering qualitative spatial queries computationally challenging. We introduce the Qualitative Place Model (QPM), a GIS-native framework that transforms standard boundary datasets and place layers into structured knowledge bases of Qualitative Place Description (QPD). QPM provides a homogeneous representation whereby administrative units and physical places are treated uniformly as Place entities. The model materializes a compact set of local relations, hierarchical containment, directional neighbourhood, and optional proximity, that support rich inferences through sound logical operations (inverse relationships and per-predicate transitive closure). We implement QPM as an ArcGIS Pro toolbox that computes and persists QPDs within a geodatabase, with optional RDF export for SPARQL querying. This implementation enables natural-language-style spatial queries such as “Where is x?” or “Which places are north of x?” within standard GIS workflows. Evaluation on Wales (UK) administrative, postal, and electoral hierarchies plus a comprehensive place layer demonstrates robust performance: QPM generated 95.8% of expected basic-place statements (52,821 places) and achieved 89.7–96.5% coverage across administrative hierarchies. All QPDs proved unique under our deterministic signature. Despite compact storage requirements, directional relations expand by more than an order of magnitude (10.6× overall expansion) under logical closure, demonstrating substantial inferential power from a minimal stored representation. QPM complements geometric GIS with an explainable qualitative layer that aligns with human spatial cognition while remaining fully operational within standard GIS environments.

Administrative geography is concerned with the hierarchy of areas related to national and local government in a country. They form an important dataset in the country’s open data provision and act as the geo-referencing backdrop for many types of geospatial data. Proprietary ontologies are built to model and represent these data with little focus on spatial semantics. Studying the quality of these ontologies and developing methods for their evaluation are needed. This paper addresses these problems by studying the spatial semantics of administrative geography data and proposes a uniform set of qualitative semantics that encapsulates the inherent spatial structure of the administrative divisions and allows for the application of spatial reasoning. Topological and proximity semantics are defined and combined into a single measure of spatial completeness and used for defining a set of competency questions to be used in the evaluation process. The significance of the novel measure of completeness and competency questions is demonstrated on four prominent real world administrative geography ontologies. It is shown how these can provide an objective measure of quality of the geospatial ontologies and gaps in their definition. The proposed approach to defining spatial completeness complements the established methods in the literature, that primarily focus on the syntactical and structural dimensions of the ontologies, and offers a novel approach to ontology evaluation in the geospatial domain.