Natasja W. M. Ramnath

Background: Perioperative right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a frequent complication of cardiac surgery linked to poor outcomes and may result from the loss of pericardial support. We investigated whether pericardial closure preserves early postoperative RV function. Methods: We compared patients with pericardial closure versus open pericardium. Co-primary endpoints were early postoperative RV longitudinal function by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV). Adjusted comparisons used analysis-of-covariance (postoperative value adjusted for baseline) with prespecified covariates (baseline outcome, LV global longitudinal strain, left-ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVI, sex, procedure; cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times when available). Holm correction-controlled multiplicity across the co-primary endpoints. Sensitivity linear mixed-effects models (time × group) were performed. Results: Pericardial closure was associated with better early RV longitudinal function after multivariable adjustment. TAPSE: adjusted mean difference (AMD, Closed–Open) 1.531 mm (95% CI 0.130–2.931; p = 0.033). TASV: AMD 1.694 cm/s (95% CI 0.437–2.951; p = 0.009; Holm-adjusted p = 0.018). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent estimates. Conclusions: Pericardial closure was independently associated with improved early RV longitudinal function. These adjusted findings address baseline LV imbalances and support considering closure to preserve RV performance; confirmation in prospective trials is warranted.

Background: The interaction between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is discussed controversial. Methods: In this population-based retrospective analysis including non-emergency CABG in Germany between 2015 and 2021, the aim was to compare in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and perioperative ventilation time (VT) in patients affected by COPD and not affected by COPD. In addition, we compared outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) surgery and outcomes after CABG with a minimally invasive technique with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in COPD patients. Results: Of the 274,792 analyzed cases undergoing non-emergency CABG, 7.7% suffered from COPD. COPD patients showed a higher in-hospital mortality (6.0% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001), a longer HLOS (13 days (10–19) vs. 12 days (9–16); p < 0.001), and a longer VT (33 h (11–124) vs. 28 h (9–94); p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, COPD patients undergoing OPCAB surgery showed a lower in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.001), a shorter HLOS (12 days (9–16) vs. 13 days (10–19); p < 0.001) and a shorter VT (20 h (10–69) vs. 36 h (11–135); p < 0.001) compared to ONCAB surgery. Regression analyses confirmed that using cardiopulmonary bypass in COPD patients is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.86; 95% CI: 1.51–2.29, p < 0.001), a longer HLOS (1.44 days; 95% CI: 0.91–1.97, p < 0.001), and a longer VT (33.67 h; 95% CI: 18.67–48.66, p < 0.001). In further subgroup analyses, COPD patients undergoing CABG with a minimally invasive technique without CPB showed a lower in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 16.5%; p < 0.001) and a shorter VT (20 h (10–69) vs. 65 h (29–210); p < 0.001) compared to CABG with a minimally invasive technique and CPB. Regression analyses confirmed that using CPB in COPD patients undergoing CABG with a minimally invasive technique is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.80; 95% CI: 2.42–9.51, p < 0.001). Conclusions: COPD negatively impacts outcomes after non-emergency CABG. According to our results, OPCAB surgery and CABG with a minimally invasive technique without CPB seem to be beneficial for COPD patients. Further studies should be performed to confirm this.