Zhengyang Dong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Zhengyang Dong has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jianguo Pan
College of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
1 shared publication - Lijun Yan
College of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Xia Cai
The College of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 14 (17) , 7952
Knowledge Graph and Personalized Answer Sequences for Programming Knowledge Tracing
Knowledge tracing is a significant research area in educational data mining, aiming to predict future performance based on students’ historical learning data. In the field of programming, several challenges are faced in knowledge tracing, including inaccurate exercise representation and limited student information. These issues can lead to biased models and inaccurate predictions of students’ knowledge states. To effectively address these issues, we propose a novel programming knowledge tracing model named GPPKT (Knowledge Graph and Personalized Answer Sequences for Programming Knowledge Tracing), which enhances performance by using knowledge graphs and personalized answer sequences. Specifically, we establish the associations between well-defined knowledge concepts and exercises, incorporating student learning abilities and latent representations generated from personalized answer sequences using Variational Autoencoders (VAE) in the model. This deep knowledge tracing model employs Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and attention mechanisms to integrate the embedding vectors, such as exercises and student information. Extensive experiments are conducted on two real-world programming datasets. The results indicate that GPPKT outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving an AUC of 0.8840 and an accuracy of 0.8472 on the Luogu dataset, and an AUC of 0.7770 and an accuracy of 0.8799 on the Codeforces dataset. This demonstrates the superiority of the proposed model, with an average improvement of 9.03% in AUC and 2.02% in accuracy across both datasets.
- 6 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 14 (17) , 7952
Open AccessKnowledge Graph and Personalized Answer Sequences for Programming Knowledge Tracing
Knowledge tracing is a significant research area in educational data mining, aiming to predict future performance based on students’ historical learning data. In the field of programming, several challenges are faced in knowledge tracing, including inaccurate exercise representation and limited student information. These issues can lead to biased models and inaccurate predictions of students’ knowledge states. To effectively address these issues, we propose a novel programming knowledge tracing model named GPPKT (Knowledge Graph and Personalized Answer Sequences for Programming Knowledge Tracing), which enhances performance by using knowledge graphs and personalized answer sequences. Specifically, we establish the associations between well-defined knowledge concepts and exercises, incorporating student learning abilities and latent representations generated from personalized answer sequences using Variational Autoencoders (VAE) in the model. This deep knowledge tracing model employs Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and attention mechanisms to integrate the embedding vectors, such as exercises and student information. Extensive experiments are conducted on two real-world programming datasets. The results indicate that GPPKT outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving an AUC of 0.8840 and an accuracy of 0.8472 on the Luogu dataset, and an AUC of 0.7770 and an accuracy of 0.8799 on the Codeforces dataset. This demonstrates the superiority of the proposed model, with an average improvement of 9.03% in AUC and 2.02% in accuracy across both datasets.