Na Li
Na Li has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chongchao Pan
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The University of Science and Technology Beijing, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China
2 shared publications - Dongxu Guo
State Grid Integrated Energy Services Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100053, China
2 shared publications - Boyuan Zheng
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The University of Science and Technology Beijing, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China
1 shared publication - Guanxiong Wang
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The University of Science and Technology Beijing, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China
1 shared publication - Guanxiong Wang
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The University of Science and Technology Beijing, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China
1 shared publication - Linna Zou
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The University of Science and Technology Beijing, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Optimal Energy Sharing Strategy in Multi-Integrated Energy Systems Considering Asymmetric Nash Bargaining
Integrated energy systems (IESs) are increasingly being deployed and expanded, which integrate various energy infrastructures to enable flexible conversion and utilization among different energy forms. To facilitate collaboration among operators of varying scales and fully leverage the economic and environmental benefits of multi-integrated energy systems (MIESs), this study develops a peer-to-peer (P2P) energy sharing framework for MIES based on asymmetric Nash bargaining. First, an IoT-based P2P energy sharing architecture for MIES is proposed, which incorporates coordinated electricity–heat–gas multi-energy synergy within IES models. Carbon capture systems (CCS) and power-to-gas (P2G) units are integrated with carbon trading mechanisms to reduce carbon emissions. Then, an MIES energy sharing operational model is established using Nash bargaining theory, subsequently decoupled into two subproblems: alliance benefit maximization and individual IES benefit distribution optimization. For subproblem 2, an asymmetric bargaining method employing natural exponential functions quantifies participant contributions, enabling fair distribution of cooperative benefits. Finally, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is employed to solve both subproblems distributively, effectively preserving participant privacy. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by case simulation, demonstrating reduced operational costs across all IESs alongside equitable benefit allocation proportional to energy-sharing contributions. Carbon emission amounts are simultaneously reduced.
Open AccessOptimal Energy Sharing Strategy in Multi-Integrated Energy Systems Considering Asymmetric Nash Bargaining
Integrated energy systems (IESs) are increasingly being deployed and expanded, which integrate various energy infrastructures to enable flexible conversion and utilization among different energy forms. To facilitate collaboration among operators of varying scales and fully leverage the economic and environmental benefits of multi-integrated energy systems (MIESs), this study develops a peer-to-peer (P2P) energy sharing framework for MIES based on asymmetric Nash bargaining. First, an IoT-based P2P energy sharing architecture for MIES is proposed, which incorporates coordinated electricity–heat–gas multi-energy synergy within IES models. Carbon capture systems (CCS) and power-to-gas (P2G) units are integrated with carbon trading mechanisms to reduce carbon emissions. Then, an MIES energy sharing operational model is established using Nash bargaining theory, subsequently decoupled into two subproblems: alliance benefit maximization and individual IES benefit distribution optimization. For subproblem 2, an asymmetric bargaining method employing natural exponential functions quantifies participant contributions, enabling fair distribution of cooperative benefits. Finally, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is employed to solve both subproblems distributively, effectively preserving participant privacy. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by case simulation, demonstrating reduced operational costs across all IESs alongside equitable benefit allocation proportional to energy-sharing contributions. Carbon emission amounts are simultaneously reduced.
- Open Access
Two-Stage Robust Optimization of Integrated Energy Systems Considering Uncertainty in Carbon Source Load
Integrated Energy Systems (IESs) interconnect various energy networks to achieve coordinated planning and optimized operation among heterogeneous energy subsystems, making them a hot topic in current energy research. However, with the high integration of renewable energy sources, their fluctuation characteristics introduce uncertainties to the entire system, including the corresponding indirect carbon emissions from electricity. To address these issues, this paper constructs a two-stage, three-layer robust optimization operation model for IESs from day-ahead to intra-day. The model analyzes the uncertainties in carbon emission intensity at grid-connected nodes, as well as the uncertainty characteristics of photovoltaic, wind turbine, and cooling, heating, and electricity loads, expressed using polyhedral uncertainty sets. It standardizes the modeling of internal equipment in the IES, introduces carbon emission trading mechanisms, and constructs a low-carbon economic model, transforming the objective function and constraints into a compact form. The column-and-constraint generation algorithm is applied to transform the three-layer model into a single-layer main problem and a two-layer subproblem for iterative solution. The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition is used to convert the two-layer subproblem into a linear programming model. A case study conducted on a park shows that while the introduction of uncertainty optimization increases system costs and carbon emissions compared to deterministic optimization, the scheduling strategy is more stable, significantly reducing the impact of uncertainties on the system. Moreover, the proposed strategy reduces total costs by 5.03% and carbon emissions by 1.25% compared to scenarios considering only source load uncertainty, fully verifying that the proposed method improves the economic and low-carbon performance of the system.
Open AccessTwo-Stage Robust Optimization of Integrated Energy Systems Considering Uncertainty in Carbon Source Load
Integrated Energy Systems (IESs) interconnect various energy networks to achieve coordinated planning and optimized operation among heterogeneous energy subsystems, making them a hot topic in current energy research. However, with the high integration of renewable energy sources, their fluctuation characteristics introduce uncertainties to the entire system, including the corresponding indirect carbon emissions from electricity. To address these issues, this paper constructs a two-stage, three-layer robust optimization operation model for IESs from day-ahead to intra-day. The model analyzes the uncertainties in carbon emission intensity at grid-connected nodes, as well as the uncertainty characteristics of photovoltaic, wind turbine, and cooling, heating, and electricity loads, expressed using polyhedral uncertainty sets. It standardizes the modeling of internal equipment in the IES, introduces carbon emission trading mechanisms, and constructs a low-carbon economic model, transforming the objective function and constraints into a compact form. The column-and-constraint generation algorithm is applied to transform the three-layer model into a single-layer main problem and a two-layer subproblem for iterative solution. The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition is used to convert the two-layer subproblem into a linear programming model. A case study conducted on a park shows that while the introduction of uncertainty optimization increases system costs and carbon emissions compared to deterministic optimization, the scheduling strategy is more stable, significantly reducing the impact of uncertainties on the system. Moreover, the proposed strategy reduces total costs by 5.03% and carbon emissions by 1.25% compared to scenarios considering only source load uncertainty, fully verifying that the proposed method improves the economic and low-carbon performance of the system.